Skip to main content

WHAT WE HAVE WROUGHT

When I was growing up, our schools were replete with narratives of self-made men (among other things, it was a chauvinistic time): captains of industry, titans of finance ... I think you get where the imagery is from. Horatio Alger stories of rags-to-riches, from dishwasher to millionaire, were poured out over us supposedly as inspiration. Those stories were so prevalent that they became part of the American Dream. But it is, just that: a dream. For many today, it is a nightmare. The John-Wayne-rugged-stop-at-nothing individualist, who with his bare hands and sheer force of will reshaped his environment and made something out of nothing was held up as our highest ideal.

But it is important to note that he creates nothing, he only destroys. Left to his own devices, he will rape the environment, pillage resources, subjugate his fellow human beings, if necessary, and he produces things upon things, so many in fact that in the end, we have no idea what to do with them all. He does not make something from nothing, rather he replaces a circumstance of no things to one that is full of things. What becomes important, in the end, are just the things. What was once considered good and noble, the human spirit, for example, is now just a weakness. In the face of things, the things we have made, we account for nothing. Look at any balance sheet from any company, productive or not, and show me where that human spirit can be found. It is not there. The closest we get to it is in the income statement where we see that people are nothing more than costs. They stick out. They are the biggest single cost item any company has. If we only had completely automated production ... If we could only get rid of these troublesome employees ... If ...

It has become so self-evident that things, and particularly our machines and gadgets, are more important than anything else that we have come to a point where the most fundamental principles of economics no longer matter. There was a time when we believed that products were produced and sold on the basis of supply and demand. We have that backward too: it is just about demand and supply, and if there is no demand, well, then, that can be produced as well.

Not long ago, people camped out on the streets overnight (an act for which OWSers were beaten and arrested) so that they would be the first in line to get the latest iPhone. I doubt there was hardly a person in line who didn't have the previous version already. Apple, however, in its own nefarious way, has managed to make us think that without the latest and greatest, we are no better than third-class citizens. Even with the gadget, we are not as cool, as smart, as chic, as whatever as the gadget, so we are second-class at best. But there is something strange about it all.

An acquaintance of mine managed to latch onto one of the new phones. I asked him how he liked it. He told me that he really hadn't figured it all out yet. The phone was capable of so much that he was a bit intimidated about using it. He said it would take him a while to get up to speed. But, he noted, you have to see this, and I was introduced to Siri. Now I don't particularly care for the domina who orders me around from my navigation system, and I certainly wasn't getting drawn in by the Apple siren, either. My friend, though, stared at that thing with what I can only call abject submission. Had Siri told him his question was stupid and he should stab himself with a fork, I would have cleared all the silverware from the table. He was hooked. He had fallen for someone who didn't even exist. But the phone ... well, it is wonderful, and it now receives more tender strokes than his girlfriend. I sometimes wonder whom he is cheating on and when.

My friend is just one of many who stand in reverent awe before the technology. They believe, at some level, that the phone, the computer, the machine, the whatever, is simply smarter than they are. What do we know? Have a question? Google it. Need a place to eat? There is an app for it. Our devices are now omnipresent (how many of you turn off your mobiles at night, or are they sleeping next to you – on the nightstand, of course?), omniscient (my phone knows where I am, so I always get the best results, there is a Starbucks not far from here, and who tells me how to get there?), and so, they are omnipotent as well. We allow the machine to determine our fate.

You doubt me? Let me share a little story that Anders shared with me:

When the police action we now know as the Korean War broke out, MacArthur, the US military chief-of-staff, and technofreak in his own way, thought it would be a good idea to simply bomb the North into the Stone Age. If we nuked them; that is, if we simply pulled out our technological ace-in-the-hole, the matter would be settled in no time. Before the affair ended, of course, MacArthur was no longer in charge, but how is it that Truman came to fire him? Most of us assume that the mere mentioning of such a heinous act, such an outright, excessive-force solution offended our sensibilities as feeling, reasoning human beings. The use of nuclear weapons at Hiroshima and Nagasaki had shown the world just how horrendous these devices were.

There were political, economic, human, and social factors involved, of course, but who wants to leave the fate of the world to such fuzzy factors as that? A clear-cut, clean, objective answer is required. So, instead of deciding first, Truman passed the responsibility onto the newly formed Defense Department's "electronic brain", which was fed all the data available on the enemy and American economy. The simulation was run to assess the feasibility and consequences of the nuclear option. The computer did not think it was a good idea, so Truman fired MacArthur. In other owrds, once the machine cleared the air, the decision was made.

Here we have a situation of what I would consider to be the deepest moral significance, and yet the humans involved, passed the buck to a machine that was programmed by no one we know and which arrived at a conclusion, we don't know how, which in turn became the basis for the next human step in history. Harry "The-Buck-Stops-Here" Truman could not bring himself to decide for himself. He shamelessly submitted his own judgment to that of an "electronic brain", for how on earth could we expect a human brain – as limited, finite, imperfect, and flawed as it is – to make such an important decision.

Originally posted to achronon on Fri Mar 08, 2013 at 06:11 AM PST.

Also republished by Community Spotlight.

EMAIL TO A FRIEND X
Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags

?

More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

  •  Tip Jar (9+ / 0-)

    None are so hopelessly enslaved as those who falsely believe they are free. -Johann Wolfgang von Goethe

    by achronon on Fri Mar 08, 2013 at 06:11:07 AM PST

  •  People learn, with power comes responsibility (1+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    achronon

    and with the power to always blame 'those who are responsible, Mobbing.

    Who wants to be mobbed, when you can make a machine responsible?

    •  Yes, I'd like to think that's how it (1+ / 0-)
      Recommended by:
      GreenMother

      would be; that's how I was raised: with power comes responsibility, but as you say ...

      None are so hopelessly enslaved as those who falsely believe they are free. -Johann Wolfgang von Goethe

      by achronon on Sat Mar 09, 2013 at 02:13:55 AM PST

      [ Parent ]

      •  Well look at the last few big disasters and (1+ / 0-)
        Recommended by:
        achronon

        scandals:

        Katrina, Gulf Gusher, the Air Force Academy Rape Scandal--

        NO one was in charge. No one takes responsibility, not really. Oh sure fines are paid, but even then----

        •  You're right. (1+ / 0-)
          Recommended by:
          GreenMother

          Fines. Yeah, fines. So what's a little cash to folks who practically print it themselves?

          When I was raising my family and things would happen, I found out that our house was haunted. When I asked, "Who did this?" the only answer I ever got was "Not me". I had never seen Not-Me, so I figured he -- or she, as the case may be -- must be a ghost that only my kids could see.

          It took a while, but we got the place de-haunted ... turns out, there was always someone responsible, perhaps not for the event (e.g. Katrina) but always for what needed to be done. You just needed to be persistent.

          We're not very persistent anymore.

          None are so hopelessly enslaved as those who falsely believe they are free. -Johann Wolfgang von Goethe

          by achronon on Sat Mar 09, 2013 at 10:46:33 AM PST

          [ Parent ]

          •  I have a similar haunting LOL ;) (1+ / 0-)
            Recommended by:
            achronon

            Sadly, I think we mostly know who is haunting our government and financial systems. However we have hired foxes and wolves to guard our hen houses.

            Foxes and wolves would never eat chickens or eggs. Never. Just ask their buddies--more foxes and wolves.

  •  We create some new technology... (3+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    Renee, dhshoops, achronon

    we just dream it up out of thin air, then step back and marvel... Wow look what we just did! Ain't we the cat's pajamas! Never realizing that we have changed our very own selves in the process.

    I started thinking along these lines back when I read Marshall McCluhan, and I haven't stopped. It's disturbing to realize the extent to which humanity is defined by its technology. Ruled by it, to a large extent.

    I like to think there's something more to myself, something other than my fires, my wheels, my books, my computers, my central heating, atomic bombs and so on. But I'm not sure what it is.

    •  McLuhan got me really thinking more (1+ / 0-)
      Recommended by:
      native

      deeply about this all.

      I am sure there is more to me that my gadgets. Fromm's To Have or To Be is an interesting look at what this could be.

      None are so hopelessly enslaved as those who falsely believe they are free. -Johann Wolfgang von Goethe

      by achronon on Sat Mar 09, 2013 at 02:16:19 AM PST

      [ Parent ]

  •  I am wondering what your vision of a (0+ / 0-)

    perfect world would look like.

  •  About Horatio Alger (2+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    Joy of Fishes, achronon

    Rags-to-riches was generally achieved in Alger's novels by the boy in rags meeting a rich patron. It's not REAL rags to riches, in fact, it's (and this is without too much exaggerating) one step up from street hustling.

    Also, Douglas MacArthur was a horribly flawed human being. The Army should have known that when instead of just clearing the Bonus Marchers off the Capitol steps in 1912, he followed them to their encampment in Anacostia, chased them out with tear gas and burned the encampment to the ground.

    As for Truman, I've tried very hard to conclude that neither bomb should have been dropped, but one was necessary to avoid the over a million deaths if a land invasion had been attempted. I don't envy Truman having to make the decision, but he doesn't deserve the blanket condemnation for dropping the bomb you conclude with.

    -7.75, -8.10; . . . Seneca Falls, Selma and Stonewall (h/t cooper888)

    by Dave in Northridge on Fri Mar 08, 2013 at 03:29:04 PM PST

    •  Couldn't agree with you more. (0+ / 0-)

      I don't know when or where the Alger story got spun into hard work. I suspect it was a overdue or long neglected Puritan thing.

      Mac Arthur was whacked, which is why I find the story about his firing so, well, ironic. I have no idea why a computer was needed to be involved at all.

      But, as you point out, that other terribly flawed individual Truman may have had his reasons, but I simply don't think any of them were any good. Japan was near the end and I firmly believe it never would have come to a land invasion, but as WW2 was waged as much against civilians as it was against military forces, it doesn't surprise me that the decision that was made was made.

      The so-called "good guys", though, are not averse to acts of punishment, for example, the fire bombing of Dresden, which killed more civilians than at either Hiroshima or Nagasaki, and was conducted for no reason at all. The Germans were beaten, it was only a matter of time till they surrendered, and there was nothing militarily to be gained by the attack. There was no industry left, nothing.

      Truman was also in on that one. I don't think he needs to be cut any slack at all, but that's just my view of the man.

      None are so hopelessly enslaved as those who falsely believe they are free. -Johann Wolfgang von Goethe

      by achronon on Sat Mar 09, 2013 at 02:26:10 AM PST

      [ Parent ]

  •  about truman (0+ / 0-)

    please give a source for your truman firing macarthur story.

  •  Sorry, I ain't buying the Truman story. How (0+ / 0-)

    about your sources?

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site