Skip to main content

Every year, the Oregon Republicans host a conference at the Oregon Coast called the Dorchester Conference, named after the hotel where the conference was first held.  Back in the days when the Republican party dominated the state, it was common to find governors and senators in attendance.  National political figures would also visit the conference.

But nowadays not so.  Currently Oregon has zero (that's zip, nada, bupkis) Republican office holders. The Republicans have not won a gubernatorial race here since 1982.  Traditionally the offices of attorney general and of secretary of state (Oregon mercifully has no office of lieutenant governor) have been looked upon as the basis for a run for the governorship.  But in 2012, the Republicans didn't even run someone in the primary for the AG spot (their candidate ended up being a last minute write-in), and their heavily-funded SoS candidate was defeated by 51 to 43%.

Of the five congressional seats, only one is head by a Republican, Greg Walden, which makes him the de facto chief of the (much reduced) Oregon Republican Party.  

This was reported by Oregonlive.com (link.  According to Oregonlive.com, Walden gave a speech at this years conference where he blamed some loudmouth Republicans for all the party's woes.  

This may be a video of Walden's speech, I wasn't there, so I'm not quite sure ...

Walden, who comes from Oregon's Second District, is the head of the Republican Party's house elections campaign op, so what he's saying at Dorchester may give a hint of the R's 2014 campaign themes.

Oregonlive.com reported what was probably a more accurate version of Walden's remarks (link)

"Our principles are right, but we don't always deliver our message well," Walden told about 400 people gathered at the Republican issues conference. "We have some members of our party who have frankly caused us all problems in the way they have talked about certain issues."
Yep, you got it.  The same old Republican response.  Change the label on the dog food can and call it "canine steak bits."  But it's still dog food, and if the dogs didn't eat it last time, they aren't going to eat it now.

Walden continues with the griping about how the Democrats (supposedly) have a technically superior software assistance, and how (correctly, it appears to me) the Ds have a superior cadre of volunteers and GOTV operation.  Ultimately however, Walden just doesn't get it:

"We do not need to moderate this party, but we do need to modernize," said Rodgers, arguing that Republicans need to sound less like bookkeepers and more like political leaders who can convince voters they care about all segments of the population.
The problem isn't that the Republicans sound like bookkeepers -- that's rich considering the drunken abandon with which they spent money under President Cheney -- but they sound like wingnuts (because, ah, they ARE wingnuts?).  

The smart Republicans in Oregon have long known this.  The last really strong Republican politician in the state, David Frohnmayer, whose gubernatorial campaign in 1990 was defeated by wingnut vote-splitting with a third party candidate, is quoted as having said, back in 1987 (link):

"We are not in danger of extinction,'' said Frohnmayer. "We're in danger of larceny, it seems to me.''
The larceny being of course the theft of the once-mainstream (and therefore dominant) Oregon R party by the wingnut fringe.

What Republicans need to do is get down on their knees and beg forgiveness of women, Hispanics, gays, people on the East and West coasts, 47 percenters, and I guess, pretty much everyone except the Koch brothers.  

Walden's failure to identify the real cause of his party's defeat (the voters don't like their policies) reminds me of another (likely) Republican ...

Poll

Greg Walden (R-Curly, Moe, and Larry) says R party needs to modernize but not to moderate. What's that mean?

18%6 votes
18%6 votes
12%4 votes
12%4 votes
21%7 votes
15%5 votes

| 32 votes | Vote | Results

EMAIL TO A FRIEND X
Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags

?

More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site