Skip to main content

Last Wednesday, Stephen Colbert took on the conservative arguments against the Voting Rights Act, and talked with Julian Bond about it.

Nation, no one is a bigger fan of the civil rights movement than yours truly.  I even attended 1963's historic March on Washington — and this is true — while still in my mother's womb.  I will never forget Martin Luther King's stirring words.  (sound of heartbeat)

That's why I'm personally invested in a challenge to the 1965 Voting Rights Act now before the Supreme Court.  That's right, the law that banned the silencing of African-Americans is finally coming before our nation's foremost silent African-American.

Of course, before the Voting Rights Act, black people were regularly kept from voting with roadblocks like literacy tests, poll taxes, and "You must be this white to vote" signs.

Now, that law is being challenged in the Supreme Court by Shelby County, Alabama.  They argue that the law is unfair because it applies only to states with histories of racial discrimination: Alabama, Arizona, Georgia, Louisiana, Mississippi, South Carolina, Texas, Virginia, and Alaska — which has a sad history of discriminating against its African-American population: Brian.

He's a good guy.

But folks, there is one key reason to strike this act down.  There's one reason to get rid of this law, as Shelby County lawyer Bert Rein explained to the Court.

BERT REIN (2/27/2013): The problem to which the Voting Rights Act was addressed is solved.
You heard him folks, racism is solved!  Jimmy, drop the fully integrated balloons!

We!  Overcame!  It!  Look at that!  Wow!

(audience cheering)

I must've missed the moment when racism ended.  I wonder when that was.  Was it the time that Ross dated Aisha Tyler on Friends?  Or when Keebler added the black elf?  Oh, I know!  It must have been when they made slavery illegal in Mississippi all the way back in four weeks ago.  (audience laughter and applause)

In fact, ladies and gentlemen, we're living in such a post-racial utopia that we couldn't suppress black votes even if we wanted to — which we definitely don't.

Luckily, conservative stalwart and Justice the Hutt, Antonin Scalia, knows that the courts have to decide this.  Because even though racism is clearly over, America's elected representatives lack the bicameral ballsack to vote against this thing.

ANTONIN SCALIA (2/27/2013): I am fairly confident it will be re-enacted in perpetuity unless, unless a court can say it does not comport with the Constitution. ... It's a concern that this is not the kind of a question you can leave to Congress. ... Even the name of it is wonderful.  The Voting Rights Act.  Who is going to vote against that in the future?
Yes, you'd have to be an a-hole to vote against that in the future.  Luckily, we've got an a-hole who will vote against it in the present!

(audience laughter and applause)

The point is, the Voting Rights Act is obsolete.  It's like an old restraining order.  These states are just saying, "Yes, I used to beat my girlfriend.  But I haven't since the restraining order, so we don't need it anymore."

Video below the fold.

Stephen also noted the coming "Snowquester", and had another Thought for Food segment.

Meanwhile, Jon finally changed the open of his show to satisfy his guest that night.  He then talked about Sen. Rand Paul's (R-KY) filibuster.

He then looked at how Congress can't even get legislation on universal preschool education passed.
Al Madrigal then interviewed some people who want to make Puerto Rico the 51st state.
Stephen talked with artist Brendan O'Connell, and Jon had on astrophysicist Neil deGrasse Tyson, which went long.  Here's the entire unedited interview in three parts.
Part 1
Part 2
Part 3

Originally posted to BruinKid on Fri Mar 15, 2013 at 05:00 AM PDT.

Also republished by Electronic America: Progressives Film, music & Arts Group.

Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags


More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site