Skip to main content

When the big, expensive restaurant on the corner is closed for repairs, smaller, leaner, mom-and-pop takeouts spring up around the neighborhood.

That's what's happening with innovation in government. The federal government is paralyzed by partisan rancor. The months roll by and nothing serious happens in our national government -- except sequesters, debt-ceiling fights and high-decibel deadlock.

So to see governments doing something practical to deal with problems, you have to look at the state and local level.

New York enacted a very strong gun control law early this year, following the slaughter in Newtown, Conn. More surprisingly, in Colorado, the lower house of the legislature has passed a stronggun control bill and the state Senate plans to take it up this month.

A handful of states from Maine to Hawaii have been debating whether to establish state banks to help finance infrastructure and economic development projects. North Dakota has had a state bank with that mandate for years.

An even more daring innovation is being explored in locations as varied as the city of Indianapolis and the state of Utah. The vehicle transportation fleet in this country is handcuffed by near-total dependence on traditional gasoline, whose cost keeps going up, and half of which is imported from governments overseas -- not all of whom wish us well. While the federal government has been moving slowly -- with a timetable that doesn't make any real changes in efficiency for a decade or more -- some local and state governments are asking if they can't do more faster. They're beginning to explore how to get their own fleets off conventional gasoline, with its high prices and large carbon footprint, and seeking to allow gas stations to offer cheaper, cleaner alternative fuels to the public this decade -- everything from methanol to natural gas to charging ports for electric batteries.

But by far the boldest and most financially consequential area of state innovation is in the area of health expenditures -- namely Medicaid. And one of the states doing the most to reconfigure its health expenditures and services is New York.

When Gov. Andrew M. Cuomo took office, he established a task force that introduced several innovations that work in combination. The first was setting an annual cap of 4 percent on the overall increase in state Medicaid expenditures. The second was working together closely with the hospitals, rather than bombarding them with a barrage of new regulations designed in Albany. And the third was requiring an integrated health care plan for the quarter of Medicaid patients who account for three-quarters of total Medicaid expenditures -- rather than having them rack up often repetitive charges in each of the silos of specialized care that can respond to only one specific aspect of their needs. All this was put in place over the past two years, and it's making a difference.

Here's a concrete example: Someone with behavioral health problems such as substance abuse might, in an extreme example, be admitted as often as five times a year to a detox center -- but with no aftercare, no follow-up. Through the requirement that an overall care plan be prepared and followed, that patient now gets better service, and costs us all a lot less money.

What would the state's annual increase in Medicaid costs have been without these innovations? A senior health systems executive in Albany estimates it would have been around the double-digit mark. When you're dealing with a program as big as Medicaid, the difference between a 4 percent annual cap and a 9 to 10 percent increase means billions of dollars.

In this and so many other areas, maybe those in Washington yelling at each other about spiraling health care costs should pause and take a look at the practical measures the states have quietly been implementing, while members of Congress posture ideologically on the national stage.

Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags


More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

    Recommended by:
    Nowhere Man

    Politics is like driving. To go backward put it in R. To go forward put it in D.
    Drop by The Grieving Room on Monday nights for support in dealing with grief.

    by TrueBlueMajority on Mon Mar 18, 2013 at 11:12:58 AM PDT

  •  Lets take the "States Rights" as our own (1+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    anonymous volanakis

    The Constitution is designed to encourage this very thing.  States can move faster, are more responsive to the people and have a lower rate of representatives per citizens.

    So it makes sense that States can do things faster and more effectively (and cheeper) than the Fed Gov.  In the State level you can get a project going with out having to convince someone from across the nation to go along with it. (New York wants a road from X to Y, has to get reps from CA to agree to support it at the Fed level)

    Not only that but you will have an easier time talking to your State Senator than with your Federal Senator.

    Heck, my State Assemblywoman lives in the area and I see her from time to time at the supermarket. My Congressman represents the whole city and lives across the city when not in DC.  I've only seen him on TV.

    We should be putting more effort at the local level, the level that you have more effect on.

    Stupid question hour starts now and ends in five minutes.

    by DrillSgtK on Mon Mar 18, 2013 at 11:31:23 AM PDT

  •  You must be new here... (2+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    Senor Unoball, Nowhere Man

    ...we don't scream at each other in all caps.

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site