Skip to main content

There's been lots of talk lately about the GOP's $10 million outreach plan and 100-page "Growth and Opportunity Project" report and what the party needs to do to rebrand or reorganize itself in the future....this seems to be an opportunity for progressives to mock their failures but i think it should be an opportunity for us to shut up and learn too.

By simply studying how the Republicans are responding to the defeat you will notice that they want to evaluate and adapt on the organizing front...even if not policy-wise.

I went to CPAC this weekend to watch two tech panels and soak up the atmosphere because it was an opportunity to learn from how the opposition is learning from us....and in some cases, how we should learn from them.

It is tempting to go to CPAC with the goal of capturing a "Macaca" moment....and someone did! Although this clip of an ignorant student putting a positive spin on slavery is shocking it is important that we not simplify our view of the attendees because of it.

I think he still represents a fringe at CPAC (which based on their straw poll is 54% young people under 26 who are largely libertarian in their social views)...besides, to me what elected officials like Michelle Bachmann are saying is much worse in comparison considering their actual power in Washington.

So, for me, the best way we can utilize these gatherings is not to mock, but to observe. Here are my thoughts:

#1 Although attendance is dwindling, let's ask ourselves....can progressives match conservative event organizing and therefore networking and relationship-building?

Let's face it....progresssives don't have anything that generates the same kind of buzz. Although some of it might come from outlandish statements by outlandish speakers the fact is the ingredients of such a gathering are lacking on our side.

The Campaign for America's Future-sponsored "American Dream" conference, which brings together progressive organizations like unions and grassroots groups, is sizable but lacks star power and youth.

Believe it or not, when it comes to the base the Republicans have a strength for youth outreach. During the expensive Reagan Dinner fundraiser on Friday night, there were two other free parties in the convention center for young people from College Republicans groups etc.

Progressives deserve credit for specialty events though, as Netroots Nation and New Organizing Institute's Roots Camp are more "bottom up" and get a younger crowd focused on the nuts and bolts of organizing and activism.

You also will find youth at events hosted by Young Democrats of America and College Democrats of America and Campus Progress, but since they are segmented from the rest of the movement they don't have the resources to put on events of such magnitude ranging from the speakers to the panels to the exhibit halls. After some moentum leading up to 2008, YDA was nearly bankrupted partly because of the lack of sustained donor support.

Is there anyway to involve OFA and the DNC in the future to develop a broader gathering? That is the scope we need to bring the movement together.

In DC, we see the microcosm of this dynamic, as we have First Friday happy hours and capitol hill clubs designed to bring conservatives together but nothing to match it on our side. In recent years my organizations Network For Progress and Generation Obama have tried to play a part on bringing Obama-supporting progressives together but the institutional support for these efforts needs to be more comprehensive and then spread nationwide.

Improving this kind of coordination not only will help us connect but could have positive ramifications in terms of communication that is needed to develop more effective unity on messaging and organizing efforts.

#2 Are progressives willing to discuss tactics not just policy?

Progressives like to talk about why our side is right on any number of issues but we need to also focus on technique as well. How else do we think conservatives keep winning elections....pure enthusiasm for their position regardless of the facts!

I was very impressed by the humble nature of the two tech panels i attended....ironically moderated by Republican "Event Evangelist" Chad Barth of Eventbrite, which represents a rare positive case study for the Right. The web site was smartly used by the Romney campaign (and grassroots progressives) to host a variety of events ranging from fundraisers to socials to volunteer activities, as it far surpasses the event platform technology used by barackobama.com.

But that was just a fraction of the story, so conservatives were actively recognizing where they need to improve on the technology front and the RNC's recent report articulates some next steps.

Progressives need to pay attention because as they say you can learn more from failure than you can successes....at the very least the report can confirm why our methods are more effective. Yet parodies like this one by Super PAC American Bridge of videos made by RNC chairmen are not the best move.

It seems like the Republicans are seeking their own "50-State Strategy" but do Democrats still have one....due to the extensive gerrymandering of congressional districts we will if we ever want the House back. And as we know, these days you need it to accomplish any PROGRESS in Washington.

LET'S LEARN FROM WHAT THE GOP IS LEARNING:
- did OFA & DNC publicly evaluate what went wrong in 2010? (No!)
- where is all the OFA & DNC tech talent now (laid off!)...and what is their plan for 2013?
- has Debbie Wasserman Schultz ever made a video to speak to Democratic Party supporters??? I would like to see one!

So, don't get cocky, progressives...we just beat a candidate who thought it was OK to tell 47% of the country they can screw themselves! (figuratively AND literally!!!)

This Huffington Post article summed up some tips the reports gives to Republicans:

"Spend less on negative advertising and spend more on ground game. Target young voters, especially young women. Build a national database that includes email and cell phone numbers. And, above all else, learn to work together."
But after watching the truly "bottom up" organizing for Obama in 2007-2008 dwindle away with little interest from OFA or the DNC and its affiliates, these are good suggestions for Democrats too....just to a different degree.

Can we spend less on TV and more on making sure organizers have health insurance and a salary that equates to more than minimum wage per hour?

Although Republican Super PACs got a lot of attention, the Obama campaign spent millions of dollars on ads too...and the effectiveness of those messages weren't much better.

A greater emphasis on grassroots-led outreach facilitated by experienced community organizers is the best direction in this highly-networked new world.

Put an emphasis on the word "experienced" as traditionally paid organizers are mostly young and inexperienced recent college graduates willing to work 12-hour days but that shouldn't necessarily be the goal for effective campaigns.

More flexible hours and appropriate compensation based on skills and experience, especially within the community being organized, needs to be a higher priority and will appeal to more veteran staffers. I don't think a voter of any age wants to hear from an organizer who is not familiar with the neighborhood and only connects with them unannounced at their door step instead of on facebook or at the local civic association meeting.

On that note, can we invest in an outreach strategy that involves real relationships not just cold voter contacts and fundraisers?

OFA once spawned outreach efforts like Generation Obama and Students for Barack Obama and Virginia for Obama and DC for Obama etc etc. These were communities fostered by staff of the primary campaign built on my.barackobama.com and facebook too. But by 2012, Generation Obama was the DNC's Gen44, a fundraising program for young professionals without any field or social media-focused voter outreach activities. The program didn't even have a twitter account.

OFA also launched Tech for Obama, it sounded like a great opportunity to get web-savvy activists together to develop cool initiatives to get the message out online but was mostly a fundraising program and an opportunity to re-post general campaign content.

Meanwhile, my.barackobama.com was a fossil without any upgrades until the much-maligned Dashboard in June 2012 that largely included 2007 technology, like on the aforementioned event platform that required knowledge of html to format event descriptions.

So, despite all the innovation coming from the "top down" in Chicago, the campaign on the ground was more antiquated and didn't meet its true potential. But where this  organizing deficiency really hurts is after the election, as most progressives hibernate while conservatives ring the phones off the hook on Capitol Hill probably because they are still plugged into grassroots Tea Party-like communities.

The new Organizing For Action is supposed to be chapter-based, which is a step in the right direction. But time will tell....OFA started out that way but it was mostly due to grassroots energy not institutional support.


Either way, if our side pretends we're diametrically the opposite of the Republican campaign model and can do no wrong we could be outflanked in the mid-terms again....if so, I just hope someone takes the time to write a "Growth and Opportunity Project" report by 2016.

EMAIL TO A FRIEND X
Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags

?

More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

  •  Tip Jar (10+ / 0-)

    https://twitter.com/fwdprogress ******************************** "Network For Hope. Network For Change. Network For PROGRESS." https://twitter.com/networkprogress *****************************

    by fwdprogress on Wed Mar 20, 2013 at 01:04:55 PM PDT

  •  Upcoming Harvard Kennedy School Panel (4+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    fwdprogress, Lujane, exterris, Chi

    The Future of the GOP: Information Technology in Politics
    WHEN  Mon., Mar. 25, 2013, 4 – 5:30 p.m.
    WHERE  John F. Kennedy School of Government, Institute of Politics, Littauer 166, 79 JFK Street, Cambridge
    GAZETTE CLASSIFICATION  Social Sciences
    ORGANIZATION/SPONSOR    Institute of Politics
    Fellows & Study Groups
    SPEAKER(S)  John Murray, Spring 2013 IOP Fellow
    Rob Saliterman, Head of Republican Advertising, Google
    Katie Harbath, Manager-Public Policy, Facebook
    Priscilla Valls, East Coast Vice President, Pandora
    CONTACT INFO    Eric Andersen: Eric_Andersen@hks.harvard.edu
    LINK    http://www.iop.harvard.edu/...

    Kennedy School also has Karen Hughes doing a seminar on crisis communication this Spring.  Your elite liberal institution at work.

    Solar is civil defense. Video of my small scale solar experiments at solarray.

    by gmoke on Wed Mar 20, 2013 at 01:31:28 PM PDT

  •  CPAC and Organizing (5+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    fwdprogress, Lujane, exterris, auditor, Chi

    I totally agree. Democrats do 2 things that Republicans do not
    1. We work hard at election time and then sit back and hope our representatives do what we want them to.
       Republicans keep putting the pressure and loud voices to get what they want in a far more coordinated fashion.

    2.Democratic groups all seem to have their own issues and agenda SEPERATELY with no national unifying message where Republicans seems to have the SAME talking points whether it is a politician or talk radio host, pundit or cable show. They are far more strategic with words (Frank Luntz)and controlling the message, framing debates etc

  •  Kudos to fwdprogress, for a dispassionate look & (2+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    exterris, Chi

    insightful analysis!

    Very useful.

    We sometimes suffer from taking our own spin too seriously. That can be necessary in the final throes of a close election, but mid-cycle it's time to step back and strategize (not just tactics).

  •  Typo, I'm sure (0+ / 0-)

    "The web site was smartly used by the Romney campaign (and grassroots progressives)"

    "No one life is more important than another. No one voice is more valid than another. Each life is a treasure. Each voice deserves to be heard." Patriot Daily News Clearinghouse & Onomastic

    by Catte Nappe on Wed Mar 20, 2013 at 02:46:02 PM PDT

    •  where is the typo (0+ / 0-)

      https://twitter.com/fwdprogress ******************************** "Network For Hope. Network For Change. Network For PROGRESS." https://twitter.com/networkprogress *****************************

      by fwdprogress on Wed Mar 20, 2013 at 03:02:18 PM PDT

      [ Parent ]

      •  The site was used by both "sides"? (0+ / 0-)

        The Romney campaign. (Republican)
        Grassroots progressives (Democrats)

        "No one life is more important than another. No one voice is more valid than another. Each life is a treasure. Each voice deserves to be heard." Patriot Daily News Clearinghouse & Onomastic

        by Catte Nappe on Wed Mar 20, 2013 at 03:06:19 PM PDT

        [ Parent ]

  •  I do not have the stomach to be (1+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    a2nite

    around that much craziness in life at one time under one roof.
    What they are teaching..I don't want to learn.  Rudeness, mean and wrong way thinking.  Sorry...I moved forward ..they haven't moved in years.  I am from the south..I lived in crazy land and there is little if anything to learn but scream louder, longer, together.

    We the People have to make a difference and the Change.....Just do it ! Be part of helping us build a veteran community online. United Veterans of America

    by Vetwife on Wed Mar 20, 2013 at 03:03:37 PM PDT

  •  Battle Ground Texas! (2+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    exterris, Vetwife

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site