Skip to main content

Trend lines for polling on approval of marriage equality.
Whatever the Supreme Court decides, the momentum is clearly in the right direction.
The Supreme Court begins hearing oral arguments on California's Prop 8 and the federal Defense of Marriage Act Tuesday, a moment that can't come soon enough for people who've been waiting and fighting for years or even decades to have their relationships recognized equally under the law (or for those who've been sleeping on the sidewalks for a chance to be spectators in the court). This much-anticipated moment brings a whole lot of questions to be followed by another seemingly endless wait, likely until June (remember waiting for the Obamacare decision?), and the tea leaf-reading of the justices' questions will be intense.

Assuming the court finds that the supporters of Prop 8 have the standing to defend the measure, four outcomes are seen as possible for Prop 8 and marriage equality: the court could uphold Prop 8, a straightforward defeat that would leave marriage equality to be fought state by state; it could allowed marriage equality in California but not elsewhere under the logic that "states can’t strip gays of the opportunity to marry once they possess the right, as they did in California for the five months before Proposition 8 was approved"; it could grant marriage equality in states that have allowed civil unions, as the Obama administration argued in its amicus brief and as Adam B has argued is a likely outcome to the case; or it could simply say marriage equality is a constitutional right. The question on DOMA is more of an up or down: constitutional or not.

Many eyes will obviously be on Justice Anthony Kennedy, a frequent swing vote, but he's not the only justice people are wondering about:

For those reading tea leaves, there are signs [Chief Justice John] Roberts could be in play. While in private practice in 1995, Roberts gave pro bono help to the legal team preparing briefs and oral arguments for the Colorado case. And Roberts is using some of his personal allotment of tickets to this week’s arguments to allow one of his cousins who’s a lesbian and her partner to attend oral arguments, the Los Angeles Times reported. [...]

There is one potential wild card on the left: Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg. Though she was a pioneering litigator for the American Civil Liberties Union on gender issues, she has repeatedly said she thinks the Roe v. Wade decision went too far because it forced a consensus that many Americans had not arrived at and led to a backlash.

Another question mark, of course, will be what wildly offensive things Justice Antonin Scalia says during oral arguments.

A decision for Prop 8 or for DOMA would obviously be a letdown and a setback for the cause of equality. But while it might reinvigorate the bigots in their flagging fight to keep people from marrying, such a decision wouldn't stop the fight for justice and would come in the face of polling showing increasing majorities in support of marriage equality. Fighting it out state by state would be grueling and there would be too many injustices along the way, but the eventual winner is clear.

Originally posted to Laura Clawson on Tue Mar 26, 2013 at 07:09 AM PDT.

Also republished by Milk Men And Women and Daily Kos.

Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags


More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site