Skip to main content

By “clean sweep for gay marriage” I mean that there is, IMHO, a strong likelihood that both state and federal laws against gay marriage may be invalidated entirely by the Supreme Court, and perhaps for reasons which may not ever be addressed in oral arguments or appear in the final opinion. Follow my arguments:

1) The two cases are a near perfect setup for the court to decide the issue once and for all time at both the State and Federal level since the two cases involve both state and federal law.  Combining both state and federal cases does not appear to be a random choice by the court.  This is a setup to wipe marriage discrimination off the books.

2) Public opinion on gay marriage is neither as divided nor as static as opinions were on abortion.  This thing is moving fast and in one direction:  favorable.  So I don't think Ginzberg will oppose us.

3) Because of the speed with which public opinion is moving, it is quite likely that the issue is going to have to be addressed AGAIN by the Supreme Court in very short order, perhaps as little as two years.  On that occasion, the pro-gay marriage side will unquestionably use arguments supplied by the final opinion used in the current case.  That puts the Court in an embarrassing position: reversing itself after only two to four years.  And in the process, accepting arguments it just provided but used for a different conclusion (a limited but positive opinion).  I promise you the justices do not want another Plessy, nor another Hardwick/Lawrence debacle.  And after Bush v Gore, the Court wants its stature back.

4) The Court may just follow the Constitution’s bars against discrimination, punishment without due process, and violation of privacy.  I know it sounds ludicrous for this court to rely on the Constitution, but stranger things have happened.

5) This issue was once gold for Republicans, but is not now, nor will it be in the future.  It is a detriment for Republicans.  Besides, it appeals to the Libertarian crowd in the GOP.  Republicans will benefit if this issue is taken completely off the table by the Supreme Court.

6) Of course, all of this flies completely in the face of the Mainstream Media’s Conventional Wisdom, which is, as we know, nearly always wrong.  Cheers.

Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags


More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

  •  Tip Jar (3+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    kevinpdx, karmsy, scott5js

    GOP Wars against: Iran, Iraq, Afghanistan, Immigrants, Mexicans, Blacks, Gays, Women, Unions, Workers, Unemployed, Voters, Elderly, Kids, Poor, Sick, Disabled, Dying, Lovers, Kindness, Rationalism, Science, Sanity, Reality.

    by SGWM on Tue Mar 26, 2013 at 03:18:18 PM PDT

  •  Actually (4+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    kevinpdx, AoT, SGWM, bythesea

    I think the Supreme Court will throw out Prop 8 for lack of standing so SSM will be legal in California.

    I think they will overturn DOMA since marriage has usually been dealt with by the states.

    •  Having just read today's arguments, it seems that (1+ / 0-)
      Recommended by:

      Kennedy, who dominates this field on the Court, is inclined to make the decision apply to the 50 states. And I think he wants to get this done, and basically he is the only one who can do this and he is getting older.  The other 4 progressive justices will go along with this whatever their qualms. It is also more than likely that  Roberts will join him on libertarian grounds (and family grounds;  he provided his lesbian neice and her wife with tickets to the proceedings).  I also think there is a good shot that Roberts will carry Alito with him.  Roberts wants as broad a decision as he can get, like Warren on school desegregation.  Your statment is true enough and has been conventional wisdom for some time now, but I think it is the minimum we can expect.

      GOP Wars against: Iran, Iraq, Afghanistan, Immigrants, Mexicans, Blacks, Gays, Women, Unions, Workers, Unemployed, Voters, Elderly, Kids, Poor, Sick, Disabled, Dying, Lovers, Kindness, Rationalism, Science, Sanity, Reality.

      by SGWM on Tue Mar 26, 2013 at 04:14:30 PM PDT

      [ Parent ]

      •  Well, I certainly hope you're right (1+ / 0-)
        Recommended by:

        but am not sure what you saw today that made you feel that  way.  I feel pretty sure that Prop 8 will not survive (perhaps due to standing, or dismissal), but nothing made me expect something broader necessarily at this time (it would be an unexpected, though welcome surprise).  I would also caution that at this stage of the ACA case everyone thought it was doomed based on the hearing.  I think the DOMA hearing tomorrow will be quite interesting.

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site