Skip to main content

Social Security card with $100 bill
With President Obama seriously considering including a chained CPI in the budget he'll release next week, the National Journal takes a close look at the chained CPI, questioning whether it's the right formula to apply to people on fixed incomes like Social Security beneficiaries and veterans. The article gets to the core problem: These groups aren't regular consumers, and shouldn't lumped in with them.
Seniors spend money differently from the average person. Health care accounted for 13 percent of spending for those 65 or older at the time the Center for Retirement Research wrote its paper. It accounted for 5 percent of spending for the general population. Not only do the elderly spend more on health care, but those costs also grow faster than others. [...]

More research also needs to be conducted on how—and whether—the low-income elderly substitute goods, according to the Center for Retirement Research. For low-income seniors, most of their spending goes to essential items such as food, housing, transportation and health care. Because they are already spending so little, they may not have as much room to maneuver around price hikes.
“With little ability to respond to price changes, the poor have no mechanism to offset the full brunt of a price increase,” the center wrote in its report.

The AARP, which has been at the forefront in trying to educate the public and policy makers about the problems a chained CPI would pose for seniors, writes about [pdf] an alternative CPI indexed specifically for the elderly, CPI-E. The government tested the measure from 1982 to 2010, and found it outpaced standard inflation by 0.27 percentage points annually. That's largely because of the out-sized portion of seniors' budget taken up by health care expenses, which consistently outpaces other areas. The AARP graphed out what a CPI-E versus the chained CPI (C-CPI-U) would look like for the average retirees years on Social Security:
Graph showing differences in Social Security benefits over 30 years with CPI-E vs. chained CPI
So, with the CPI-E, benefits grow as a person ages, and as their health care needs and expenses also grow. The chained CPI does exactly the opposite, shrinking benefits in the years an older person has more out-of-pocket medical expenses. The Social Security Administration estimates that 34 percent of those age 80 or older rely on the benefits for at least 90 percent of their retirement income. That means a third of the really elderly population would be in danger of real poverty, increasing as they age, under a chained CPI.

It's the wrong policy for a population that is already feeling a major financial squeeze, and should not be a part of President Obama's budget plan, or a concession for that ever-elusive grand bargain with Republicans.

Send an email to the White House telling President Obama to give up the chained CPI cuts to Social Security and veterans.

Originally posted to Joan McCarter on Wed Apr 03, 2013 at 03:55 PM PDT.

Also republished by Social Security Defenders and Daily Kos.

Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags


More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site