Skip to main content

The response to the bank failures in Cyprus has ostensibly been about cracking down on money laundering, but the action being taken will take down the country's economy with it.

Cross posted from Pruning Shears.

The economic crisis in Cyprus began with a depressingly familiar story: bank gambles on risky debt, loses its bet, goes bust and needs a bailout.  It very quickly took what was to me1 a bewildering turn: Instead of a central bank cranking up the money printing machines until smoke billowed from them creating sufficient reserves to keep the banks going, the so-called troika of the European Commission, the International Monetary Fund, and the European Central Bank had another idea: take money from individual depositors.

This seemed like an astoundingly stupid idea.  It was wrong on matters of simple equity.  Those who were innocent of any wrongdoing or incompetence should not have been on the hook for remediation.  But it was also wrong for a much more practical reason: raiding customers' deposits would utterly destroy confidence in the entire country's banking system.  No one would ever trust a Cypriot bank again; only those forced to use them would do so.  Which, since banking is (was) the largest industry in the country, meant that Cyprus' economy would be wrecked.

As all this unfolded I really had trouble wrapping my mind around the relative equanimity with which it was being received.  Paul Krugman even referred to the seizing of assets as a haircut.  Now, just to be clear: I'm an economics layman and Paul Krugman is a Nobel Laureate in it.  He has probably forgotten more about economics than I will ever know.

But my understanding of a haircut is that it refers to the reduction in value of a security; bonds are the most common examples I've seen.  Are bank deposits used as collateral or otherwise treated as investments?  Sure - by the institution receiving them, but not by the depositors themselves.  At the very least, describing what's happening in Cyprus as a haircut seems to require a somewhat, um, flexible understanding of the concept.

There has been a certain kind of distasteful resignation in the financial reporting on this, as though everyone recognizes it's a bad situation but unfortunately this is the best way out of it.2  And I read those reports and analyses almost with incredulity.  This is going to destroy an entire country's economy and cause an unfathomable amount of misery for its citizens.  Don't any of the major players know that?

A couple weeks in I got my answer: Of course they did.  Destroying the country's banks was by design.  In a remarkably candid analysis Tyson Barker led with this:

The architects of the euro had one primary strategic goal. It was, to play on Lord Ismay's famous quip about NATO, to keep the Americans out, the Germans in and the Mediterranean states down
Later in the article Barker casually refers to the nation's banking sector being halved.3  With finance and real estate representing a quarter of the country's entire economy, this is a ruinous development.  It does not occur in a vacuum either.  Tourism represents another quarter of its economy, and because of the chaos it too is taking a huge hit.  In other words, half the Cyprus economy just got whacked.

The remaining half is on the fault line of this quake, too.  As Karl Denninger noted, many businesses will  be crippled:

There were branches of the Cypriot banks that were open in London during the time that they were closed in Cyprus. So if you were Russian that have great deal of money in these banks, or you were some kind of other off-shore person, who had money in these banks and you had some cash, you get on the plane, go to London and then you take all your money out. While the small business person in Cyprus who has his money there and needs to make payroll has his stolen.
In other words, this across-the-board seizure of money isn't (or isn't just) going after obscenely wealthy foreigners who have stashed their loot in Cypriot banks under sketchy circumstances.  Local businesses that kept their operating funds at local banks are now seeing those funds disappear too.  So even if, for example, the external factors causing the nosedive in tourism get resolved, there will be a far less attractive industry to cater to foreigners on holiday.  No wonder the forecast for the country is bleak.

Such brutal tactics were not necessary.  Even assuming that Germany (which appears to be setting the direction for the troika) is sincerely on the warpath against tax evasion, its efforts closer to home have been far more diplomatic and targeted.  Barker describes German efforts to nab tax evaders in Liechtenstein and Switzerland through a process he delicately refers to as "shadowy data acquisition."  Why not use that same kind of surgical approach to Cyprus?  Taking a wrecking ball to the banking sector just supports the thesis that it's about keeping the Mediterranean states down.

Barker's theory was substantially reinforced last weekend when the New York Times reported: "A key demand of a recent bailout deal announced for Cyprus was that the nation drastically shrink its role as a financial center and, many in Germany suspect, a haven for money laundering."

It may well be that Germany is going after money laundering as its primary goal, but it is using remarkably crude means to achieve that end.  Since there will be such blindingly obvious and disastrous consequences, it seems only fair to say that it is also ultimately responsible for the human effects of it.  Some in the troika appear to know as much and already sound defensive about it:

French Finance Minister Pierre Moscovici rejected charges that the EU had brought Cypriots to their knees, saying it was the island's offshore business model that had failed.

"To all those who say that we are strangling an entire people ... Cyprus is a casino economy that was on the brink of bankruptcy," he told Canal Plus television.
Both those things can be true though:  It can be true that Cyprus was a casino economy on the brink of bankruptcy and that the troika's remedy will cause needless suffering throughout the nation.
Towards the end of last year Tim Pat Coogan released a book that sparked a debate over Ireland's suffering between 1845 and 1852.  I hadn't known this, but even the name of that period is controversial.  It is commonly known as the Great Famine, but many in Ireland now reject that term.  The traditional understanding is that catastrophic crop failures led to mass starvation.  

But many refer to it as the Great Hunger due to the belief that the crop failure (which did actually occur) was not destined to kill so many people; rather, it was British policy that took a grim circumstance and made it horrifying.  Coogan calls it genocide.  Others, trying to be more charitable towards Britain, put it down to Ireland being "the unfortunate test case for a new Victorian zeal for free market principles, self-help, and ideas about nation-building."4

Looking back a century and a half later, the verdict is damning either way.  Whether by design or as a direct and easily foreseeable consequence of a kind of free market idolatry, those responsible are now thought to have unleashed a monstrous evil and are judged accordingly.  What is happening to Cyprus now won't cause the starvation of a million people, but the hardship it will inflict is nothing to shrug off, either.  And everyone can see it coming.


1. As a distant American observer and macroeconomic layman, that is.

2.  Another curiosity: Isn't anyone bothered by the nice, round numbers for everything?  I jokingly referred to it as the Base 10 Bailout: €10b to banks, deposits over €100k seized, €100 ATM limit.  Everything can be expressed as a power of 10.  Does this sound like the result of a team of experts auditing the situation and at least estimating the numbers?

3. I had trouble parsing Barker's language here:

With its banking sector halved, the country faces a difficult if not impossible challenge to re-establish its status as a financial oasis. The high-risk political economy that fueled the tiny island-nation since 1974 has ended.
What is the high-risk political economy he refers to?  In a crisis brought about by high risk banking practices, why mention political ones in passing and not fill it in with a little detail?  And what does 1974 have to do with it?  To me it smacks of conservatives blaming the 2008 financial crisis on the 1977 Community Reinvestment Act.  In other words: find a scapegoat to fit the ideological narrative, even if it means implausibly reaching back decades.

4. In the Economist article, author Y.F. also writes: "Poverty was considered a moral failure."  Laissez faire capitalists seem prone to such theological zeal in their ostensibly rational worldviews, which may explain why religious fundamentalists and free enterprise evangelists seem to end up in right wing coalitions with each other.

Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags


More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

  •  Insured deposits Vs uninsured deposits (1+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:

    In Cyprus bank deposits are government insured for the first €100,000.  For deposits greater than this the depositor's deposit is only as good as the bank is sound.

    As long as the stockholders and bond holders of the bank are wiped out before depositors lose any money, this is the way it should work.

    The Cypus banking crisis is a direct result of the European banking rules that said European sovereign debt was to be treated as tier 1 capital without regard to its true worth.  

    The most important way to protect the environment is not to have more than one child.

    by nextstep on Sat Apr 13, 2013 at 08:25:06 AM PDT

  •  I really don't understand Cyprus (0+ / 0-)

    It seems there are so many causes of this.

    One thing: are the Germans not really concerned with money laundering, but trying to close Cyprus as a tax haven ?

  •  Regardless (2+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    kaliope, danps

    of what the Germans are trying to do (and there may be several competing agendas), the result is likely to be dangerous repercussions in Greece and Cyprus.

    The Greeks haven't forgotten German occupation during WWII.  Although quickly overwhelmed in the conventional battle, the Greeks (like most of the Balkan peninsula, beneficiaries of several centuries of occupation and resistance under the Turks) proved to be viciously enthusiastic Resistance fighters.  And the much touted right-wing extremists, the Golden Dawn, bear a deeper than surface resemblance to the Nazis themselves, who came to power due to similar economic circumstances created by similar (massive international debt enforced at gunpoint) causes.  In the last election, it was the centrist parties that lost large shares of the vote.  Both the left- and right-wing extremists picked up significant followings -- just as with interwar Germany and France.

    Domestic political violence in Greece is historically common; the culture tends to extreme differences of opinion backed up by willingness to hold a grudge until it putrifies.  Cyprus only failed to unify with Greece in the 70's due to heavy international pressure, and then the Turks invaded.  Makarios, who at least was able to command respect from all Cypriot factions, is no longer with us.  So between Greece and Cyprus both being screwed by the troika, the situation is likely to be increasingly fragile; violence increasingly probable, and an open embrace of facism not by any means impossible.

    I don't know how much this will affect the rest of the EU immediately, but if Greece and/or Cyprus give up and bow out, I suspect Spain and Portugal won't be far behind.  Germany's economy will nosedive as it loses its captive Southern export markets.  And while I doubt that France and Germany will want to get involved in military confrontations again, I wouldn't bet the farm on German-Russian relations remaining quiet.  There's the little matter of recurring disputes over natural gas shipments, and the lost money of the Russian oligarchs in Cyprus.  The balance is getting real iffy.

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site