Skip to main content

Farmers and community members in Blue Hill, Maine rally to defend their recently enacted Local Food and Community Self- Governance Ordinance.
Part 10 of the Harvesting Justice series

Heather Retberg stood on the steps of the Blue Hill, Maine town hall surrounded by 200 people. “We are farmers,” she told the crowd, “who are supported by our friends and our neighbors who know us and trust us, and want to ensure that they maintain access to their chosen food supply.”

Blue Hill is one of a handful of small Maine towns that have been taking bold steps to protect their local food system. In 2011, they passed an ordinance exempting their local farmers and food producers from federal and state licensure requirements when these farmers sell directly to customers.

The federal government has stiffened national food-safety regulations in order to address the health risks associated with industrial-scale farming. Recent widespread recalls of contaminated ground turkey, cantaloupe, eggs, and a host of other foods illustrate the serious problems at hand. These outbreaks have been linked to industrial farms with overcrowded animals and unbalanced ecosystems. The significant distance between industrial farms and consumers creates a lack of accountability and difficulty tracing problems when they arise.

Small-scale farming, however, doesn’t spark the same safety risks. Small farmers who sell their food locally will tell you that the nature of their business, based on face-to face relationships with the people who eat their food, creates a built-in safety protection. They don’t need inspectors to make sure they are following good practices. Keeping their neighbors, families, and long-time customers in good health is an even better incentive. Customers are also more able to witness the farming practices firsthand.

Still, small farmers are being pushed out of business because they are saddled with the financial and bureaucratic burdens of the same regulations as large industrial farms. Heather and her family’s Quill’s End Farm raise grass-fed cows, lambs, pastured pigs, chickens for eggs and meat, turkeys, dairy cows, and goats. The diverse mix is better both for the land and the economic viability of the farm.
Given the scale of their business, building their own chicken processing unit was financially out of the question, so instead they were butchering at a neighboring farm’s USDA-approved unit. When state inspectors told them that USDA regulations didn’t allow them to share this neighbor’s facility, Quill’s End Farm was forced to stop raising and selling chickens altogether.

“I just remember the feeling that if that was happening to us, the same message was being given to all sorts of farmers of our scale and people were just going to give up and stop farming,” said Heather. “My sense, more than anything, was a really daunting realization that, ‘Oh, this is how farms get disappeared.’ And people are so supportive, but then when we disappear, everybody might just kind of shake their heads like, ‘Oh, it must just be really tough to make it farming.’”

So Heather, together with a small group of other farmers and farm patrons in Maine, began crafting the Local Food and Community Self-Governance Ordinance, the first of its kind in the country. The ordinance exempts direct sales between farmers and customers - at farms, farmstands, and markets, for example - from state and federal licensing and inspections. It allows Heather to sell chicken at her farmstore, and Bob St. Peter, a fellow farmer and organizer, to sell his homemade cookies at the farmers’ market.

In March 2011, the ordinance passed unanimously in the town of Sedgwick, Maine. Three days later it was presented at Heather’s town meeting in Penobscot. “We spent a good while talking about whether to give $3,000 to our local library,” says Heather, “and I was sitting there thinking ‘Whoa, this is a tough crowd.’ But then when the ordinance came up, it was another unanimous vote. It was tremendous.” Other towns in Maine immediately followed suit.

Since then, says Heather, “We’ve heard from people in Tennessee, Texas, California, Virginia… someone in New Zealand. Last year, Vermont passed a food sovereignty resolution with similar language. Over in California they’re working in the direction of an ordinance in Mendocino County. In Arizona they’re beginning to circulate petitions. And this fall we heard that a town in Utah had passed the ordinance.” Over the two years following Sedgwick’s success, more than eight towns in Maine itself have adopted such ordinances.

As of this writing, Maine’s State Department of Agriculture is challenging one of the local ordinances by suing a dairy farmer.  Community members are reaching out to friends in surrounding counties and national food justice coalitions, asking them to call in and urge the state to drop the suit. The case has drawn national attention. Meanwhile, organizers from far and wide are watching closely, hoping to launch similar initiatives in their own communities.

In addition to efforts at the local level, farmers and activists are attempting to tackle the government’s one-size-fits-all approach to food safety at the federal level. When US legislators voted to increase Food and Drug Administration inspections and reporting requirements for farms in 2010, more than 150 food groups succeeded in winning an amendment that provides some exemptions for small farmers.
“Foodborne illnesses don’t come from family agriculture,” says Senator Jon Tester from Montana, who co-sponsored the amendment.

Download the Harvesting Justice pdf here, and find action items, resources, and a popular education curriculum on the Harvesting Justice website. Harvesting Justice was created for the US Food Sovereignty Alliance, check out their work here.

Read more from Other Worlds here, and follow us on Facebook and Twitter!

Copyleft Other Worlds. You may reprint this article in whole or in part.  Please credit any text or original research you use to Tory Field and Beverly Bell, Other Worlds.

Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags


More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

  •  Small farms have been under attack, and not just (6+ / 0-)

    from the USDA.  Thank you for raising this important issue.

    Many farms have had no option but to convert to the industrialized models or go under, which necessitates the introduction of chemicals into the US food system, our soil and water.  The results can be seen from space in the dead zones where waterways near industrial farming areas spill into the Gulf of Mexico and the Chesapeake Bay.

    I have had large corporations that want to support sustainable practices tell me that they cannot buy non-GMO soybean oil because its not available on a large scale given that over 90% of US soy is GMO.

  •  This is brilliant (4+ / 0-)

    and urgently needed.  Thanks for posting this.

    Dkossers need to wake up to the local food issue.  It is THE most inspiring, most effective, and most important movement toward small d democracy in my lifetime.

    It cuts across economic class, political party, urban and rural lines, religions, even to some extent, race.

    It is good for the environment, the local economy, human health, and promotes positive relationships between people who would otherwise never meet.

    Most significant, it is the one sure way we can take power back at the local level from the corporate overlords who accumulate riches by selling us garbage, ruining our lands, air and water, and who then use their profits to roll back democracy through corporate political donations and lobbying.

    Keep up the good work.

    Industrial food production in America ruins our health, our environment and consumes more fossil fuel than any segment of our economy.

    by Mi Corazon on Mon Apr 15, 2013 at 11:07:56 AM PDT

  •  Thank you. (4+ / 0-)

    Good to hear.

    These are important battles, for many reasons.

    Frankly, I'd rather take down Exxon or Goldman Sachs, the way we're taking down RushBeckistan, than elect another "better" Democrat who's going to wind up singing for the bankster choir.

    by Words In Action on Mon Apr 15, 2013 at 11:08:25 AM PDT

  •  I'm sorta glad I'm getting older (6+ / 0-)

    Because what I do, operating a small goat dairy that makes cheese will be much more difficult down the road.  The particular federal regulation on the horizon that will be impossible to comply with is NAIS which stands for National Animal ID System:

    The above link makes it all sound so much more benign than it actually will be for small producers. While large producers can group a herd of 1,000 animals together as one "record", my little herd will need to have each animal tracked from birth to death, using RF tags.  Any time an animal is moved, there are reporting requirements.  The wiki link says a few dollars per animal, but they leave out the information that the equipment to attach and read the tags is thousands of dollars and the record keeping is very onerous.  One version of the law stated that every visitor to the farm needed to be logged with copies taken of ID, even my son, every time he visits.  Did I mention penalties for noncompliance?  

    With each farm bill it changes a little and Jon Testor is an advocate for us small farmers, and right now, the program is voluntary.... however, the Feds give each state money as incentive for various stages of implementation.  I've already had to "register" my herd online with the Feds and each time I take animals to the auction, I get charged a per animal fee of $5.  When you are selling a baby goat for $15 on an average day, auction fees of about three dollars, plus the five dollars for the "Scrapie Erradication" program ie NAIS, leaves you not much left over.  My ODA inspectors say "get ready, it's coming".

    Raising animals the old fashioned way will get harder and more expensive, driving small producers out.  Large corporations do not want a thriving local food economy, they want us all dependent on them and Monsanto.

  •  If anything can go wrong, it will. (0+ / 0-)
    Small-scale farming, however, doesn’t spark the same safety risks. Small farmers who sell their food locally will tell you that the nature of their business, based on face-to face relationships with the people who eat their food, creates a built-in safety protection. They don’t need inspectors to make sure they are following good practices. Keeping their neighbors, families, and long-time customers in good health is an even better incentive. Customers are also more able to witness the farming practices firsthand.
    I'm a hard overhead hawk, there's no reason for verification regimes to ever be a large percentage of gross receipts.

    But this doesn't pass the sniff test.  At some level, you always need site inspections to some kind of objective standard, and discipline to maintain standards.

    -7.75 -4.67

    "Freedom's just another word for nothing left to lose."

    There are no Christians in foxholes.

    by Odysseus on Mon Apr 15, 2013 at 02:42:49 PM PDT

Click here for the mobile view of the site