Skip to main content

That's my initial reaction to hearing that Congress has agreed to spare the FAA from the brunt of the sequester, to avoid, of all things, flight delays. By a veto-proof majority, no less.

Why is this such a big deal?

Rewind to a few short months ago, when the Obama administration was arguing that it would not make sequestration easier to live with, because that would make sequestration more likely to be permanent.

The bottom line is that Republican bill makes the sequester easier to live with, and the White House doesn’t want the sequester to be easier to live with. The point of these poorly constructed spending cuts, in the White House’s view, is that they’re hard to live with, and that forces both sides to compromise. Making the sequester a bit better makes it much harder to replace.
Fast forward to today:
In effect, what Democrats said Friday was that in any case where the political pain caused by sequestration becomes unbearable, they will agree to cancel that particular piece of the bill while leaving the rest of the law untouched. The result is that sequestration is no longer particularly politically threatening, but it’s even more unbalanced: Cuts to programs used by the politically powerful will be addressed, but cuts to programs that affects the politically powerless will persist. It’s worth saying this clearly: The pain of sequestration will be concentrated on those who lack political power.
First they say that the sequestration will be so terrible that everyone will do everything in their power to avoid it. Then once it became clear that it would most certainly happen, they say they refuse to make it hurt any less because that would make it less likely that it would be eliminated. Now, they've gone and made sequestration a bit less painful, but only for the type of people who aren't really hurting that much, relative to some other losers to sequestration (flight delays? take a damn bus).

Sequestration has now become one of the worst policies under the Obama administration and the US Congress, the last one as well as the current one. Not only did they orchestrate a systematic reduction in government services called the sequester, but they have now made it more likely to be permanent, more likely to disproportionately affect the people with the least amount of political power, and have basically sent the message that they have abandoned any attempt at bipartisan compromise to eliminate the sequester, only its impact on the people they care about the most.

If there's any way to retain hope in all this, it's in knowing that the next elections are only a few more years away.

Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags


More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site