Skip to main content

job claims, Week ending May 4, 2013
The Department of Labor reported Thursday that seasonally adjusted, first-time applications for unemployment compensation fell again. For the week ending May 4, claims fell to 323,000, down 4,000 from the previous week's revised figure of 327,000, originally reported as 324,000. For the comparable week of 2012, 366,000 jobless Americans filed first-time claims.

The four-week running average, which flattens the volatility of the weekly numbers, fell 6,250 to 336,750 from the revised average of 343,000.

During the best economic year of the Clinton administration, first-time claims averaged about 280,000 a week.

For all programs, state and the federally funded "emergency" extensions, there were, for the week ending April 20, 4,874,526 people making claims. For the comparable week of 2012, 6,423,153 people were making claims.

Less than 40 percent of the unemployed are now receiving benefits compared with around 70 percent when the impact of the Great Recession was at its worst. Some 1.77 million Americans are receiving federally funded benefits under the Emergency Unemployment Compensation provisions put in place because of the recession. Those receiving EUC benefits are seeing their checks slashed at least 10 percent because of the sequester. In California, the cut is 17.5 percent. The cuts don't affect those receiving state benefits, which is the category that all the approved first-time applicants fall into. But the sequester is also reducing the amount of administrative assistance state employment programs provide.

The drop in overall numbers receiving employment compensation is partly because people have found jobs and no longer need the benefits and partly because some people have exhausted their benefits and now receive nothing. How many of that latter category have given up looking for a job altogether isn't known.

But it's obvious that someone who has been on unemployment compensation for a year or more looking for work each week without finding any is more likely than not to give up the search entirely unless the job market improves significantly. And giving up even though they still want a job means they don't get counted as being in the labor market and, therefore, aren't included in tallying the official unemployment rate, which is now 7.5 percent. The practice of dropping them from the rolls, even though they want jobs, distorts the overall unemployment picture.

Although the seasonally adjusted job gains reported by the Bureau of Labor Statistics last Friday was considerably better than expected at 165,000, that's slightly down from the 168,000 monthly average for the previous 12 months. So, while layoffs of compensation-eligible workers continues to drop, hiring is still far weaker than needed to quickly get the employment rate back to where it was in December 2007, that being 5 percent. In fact, at the current rate of hiring, it would take five more years to return to that rate.

What none of these statistics tell us is how good the jobs being offered are. Part-time employment rose this month and those jobs are counted the same as full-time jobs in the BLS's "headline" numbers. Full time or part time, one thing we know is that, when adjusted for inflation, the average non-farm worker's wages have risen less than 50 cents-an-hour since 2007. That stagnation is not merely a product of the recession and its aftermath but reflects a chronic, decades-long problem that most policymakers seem completely oblivious to.

Originally posted to Daily Kos Labor on Thu May 09, 2013 at 08:49 AM PDT.

Also republished by Invisible People and Daily Kos.

EMAIL TO A FRIEND X
Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags

?

More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site