Skip to main content

The Elimination of Violence against Women law was issued by presidential decree in 2009. Fawzia Kufi recently brought the law up for debate in parliament, hoping to strengthen the law by going through the parliamentary approval step. Other people were pretty well aghast at this step, that it would backfire, and end up with the law being gutted.

The decision to seek parliamentary approval for the law had split women activists.

Some had said opening it up for debate in parliament could pave the way for conservatives to amend it and weaken protection for women - or even throw it out altogether.

Afghan parliament halts debate on women's rights law, BBC

The debate started. Conservative MPs spoke for about twenty minutes. Speaker of the House Abdul Rauf Ibrahimi then effectively shut down and tabled the debate.
The conservative MPs who spoke up against the EVAW law, according to parliament observers, represent a strong group in parliament but because of the lack of official political party-based factions their numerical strength is difficult to measure. According to Reuters, most of those who spoke today are members of the influential Ulema Council. The group could have succeeded in changing the face of the EVAW law, with wide ranging consequences for women in the whole country, but, at this point, the Speaker of the House, Abdul Ra’uf Ibrahimi, elected from Kunduz and known to be close to Hezb-e Islami, stated the draft obviously needed more discussion and referred it back to the Joint Commission. He ended the debate, leaving behind some very angry MPs, some very relieved MPs and an altogether emotional house.

Damage Avoided, for Now? The very short debate about the EVAW law, Afghanistan Analysts Network

News media reporting on the debate is split into two different takes on the matter. In one version, the bill was blocked, and the outcome is negative.

Conservative religious lawmakers in Afghanistan blocked legislation on Saturday aimed at strengthening provisions providing more freedoms for women...
Afghan lawmakers block law on women's rights,  Associated Press
Afghanistan's parliament has blocked women's rights legislation...

Afghanistan's parliament fails to pass women's rights legislation, Global Post

Afghanistan's parliament failed to pass a law on Saturday banning violence against women, a severe blow to progress made in women's rights in the conservative Muslim country since the Islamist Taliban was toppled over a decade ago

Afghan parliament fails to pass divisive women's law,  Reuters

The law on elimination of violence against women got a negative response from a number of MPs and was dropped from its agenda.

Law on Elimination of Violence Against Women Dropped by Parliament, Tolo News

Activists say the move Saturday is a blow to progress made in women's rights in the conservative Muslim country since the ousting of the Taliban from power.

Afghan Lawmakers Block Women's Rights Law, Voice of America

In the other version, the significance of the outcome, positive or negative, is at least a matter for debate.

And now, preserving any protections long-term appears to be in question, as the country’s tiny women’s rights movement faces an unenviable decision: leave intact the only law that attempts to halt such abuses, or continue to present changes to Parliament and run the risk that a growing conservative bloc could dismantle the law entirely.

Effort to Strengthen an Afghan Law on Women May Backfire, New York Times

Also, BBC.
Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags


More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site