Skip to main content

Republicans have long championed the discredited ideas of the late Milton Friedman, a conservative economist who argued that the country is much better off economically if citizens are "free to choose." Sounds great, but in the real world, Republicans are busy reducing your choices even as they insist they're busy protecting your right to choose.

As in health care, for instance. Would you rather have an operation that forces you into bankruptcy, or would you rather die young? See, that's a choice you're free to make, absent health care reform. And then there's that pesky-to-Republicans choice issue concerning whether a woman has the right to control her own body. Yes, say too many in the modern GOP. She can either go to an anti-abortion clinic for a negative opinion, or she can have an invasive ultrasound test. Choice!

Then there's the Republican bill in the US House of Representatives to turn the government student loan program back over to the for-profit “free market” that ran the national economy into the ground just five years ago. The scheme would reset the student loan rate every year, a move critics said would eventually double the current interest rate. Ah, but students would be free to choose which private lender would offer them a usury loan. This is a good thing according to Republicans, who say, philosophically speaking, that banks ought to do lending, not government, even if banks have proved quite rapacious lending to students in the past.

The latest example of this bait-and-switch brand of "we choose, you comport" politics comes courtesy of Wisconsin State Representative Dale Kooyenga (R-Brookfield), a suburban conservative who apparently has decided that a University of Wisconsin student group looks way too much like a labor union; because, you know, it represents a constituency that, um, doesn't always agree with Republicans. He just helped push a measure -- strangely attached to the pending state budget bill -- that is likely to remove most of the student group's non-state funding, just like the state GOP earlier enacted Gov. Scott Walker's union-busting bill, which has had the effect of taking private membership dues away from most of the state's public employee unions.

Of the GOP's new move, aimed at UW's multi-campus United Council of Student Governments, Kooyenga crooned: "It probably looks like a political hit, and that didn't help, but I am just philosophically opposed to charging people fees for things they don't support."

Really, sir? I beg to differ. To find out why, read on below the cloud of backroom cigar smoke.

If Rep. Kooyenga thinks citizens shouldn't be charged for public or private programs they don't support, then why am I and other State of Wisconsin taxpayers forced to pay for all sorts of unwise, unthrifty, socially and economically harmful programs and tax breaks that we don't support? I refer to often draconian policies Kooyenga and other Wisconsin's ruling GOP has imposed recently that tend to benefit businesses and wealthy individuals, and especially the mining deregulation law which harm the state's natural environment, all at the expense of the vast majority of Wisconsin residents. And then there's Kooyenga's own new state tax plan, which some analysts say will heavily cut state taxes on the most comfortable while leaving the most afflicted -- including much of the working class -- in serious discomfort, thanks to earlier cuts in services that Walker Republicans imposed upon them. [Once more, for the record: Trickle-down Reaganomics doesn't work; even Ronald Reagan abandoned that scheme, eventually.]

Kooyenga is also the guy who decided he doesn't want even a cent of his utility bill spent on a pending, federally funded, Milwaukee streetcar project. Even though the project uses no state dollars, Kooyenga introduced a proposed state law to ban the  possibility of the city charging utility companies.

This ever-so-thoughtful law is aimed at exactly one project out of thousands involving transportation projects in Wisconsin. Never mind that other road-based projects across the state in fact sometimes require re-routing of utility lines within what is, in Republican politics, an increasingly theoretical public right of way. Those costs typically have been borne by utility customers. But Kooyenga, like many of his fellow Republicans who depend on big campaign donations from highway construction companies, doesn't like the streetcar project, so he's trying to see to it that he shouldn't have to contribute to it, even only slightly and indirectly. And the best he can do is suggest that since he isn't going to ride the streetcar, he shouldn't have to pay for it.

Well, hey, Rep. Kooyenga: I don't like the way West Bluemound Road going through your district is, thanks to state dollars, turning into a quasi-freeway, a huge eyesore and environmental catastrophe that has only encouraged wasteful sprawl in metro Milwaukee. I think the road is more than big enough already. So, following your example, and since I don't live in your heavily red suburb, I insist you back a law protecting me and most other state residents from having to pay any state taxes or utility fees to further expand and maintain that street. Let City of Brookfield property tax payers take care of that. Because, to employ your own argument, many of the rest of us are philosophically opposed to being charged for things we don't support.

Actually, that part above in boldface is just a thought experiment, I am, in fact, annoyed with Bluemound Interstate Highway, er, I mean Road, but, horrendous though this endless, strip-malled thoroughfare has become, I realize that, overall, the greater good of the entire populace requires that some of the dollars we contribute to public services and programs are, just like union dues or student fees, often are only going to benefit some of us, sometimes, and not always directly. Nevertheless, well-considered projects and programs often are beneficial to those who don't directly gain.

So we shouldn't base political decisions on whether most Wisconsin residents never drive down Kooyenga's residential street or aren't aggrieved college students or don't like flu shots. It's not a perfect world. But we need to continue striving for balance.

Democracy, you see, requires real debate and reasoned compromise, along with diverse voices from a multiplicity of interest groups. If we are indeed better off by being free to choose, we need to have real choices, and one size certainly does not fit all. But Kooyenga and his pals in the GOP apparently can't figure this out. Or, more likely, they do understand it but are just rationalizing their overriding modus operandi, namely: Always punish opponents and reward backers. Especially financial backers.

After all, Kooyenga's antipathy toward the United Council of UW Student Governments is rather more nuanced than his above-stated philosophy. The legislature's GOP-dominated Joint Finance Committee this week voted to make it much harder for the council to receive the modest $3 per student fee that funds its work. The council is a student advocacy organization, the formal voice of the student body, and has argued among many other issues for lowering university tuition. Other Republicans joined with Kooyenga in voting to do just that, but then also decided to effectively kill the messenger, i.e., the council. Because, you see, since the advent of Karl Rove-style GOP politics, messaging is everything, and nobody but Republicans should be sending out any messages. That would be too ... unsettling.

As the GOP achieved earlier with Wisconsin's public employee unions, this voluntary dues requirement will up-end the way in which student fees to support the United Council are collected. The GOP move would make the fee sent to the council entirely voluntary, with students opting in to pay it, rather than having it collected automatically.

Just like the unions, the council's representation of students on numerous UW campuses is based on majority votes by students in favor of the effort. And just like the Walker-confined public employee unions, students who opt out of contributing to support the council's operations would still benefit from its accomplishments. They would, in effect, be getting something for nothing, an outcome Republicans profess to hate but once again are busy enabling, in this case to neutralize a potential political opponent.

Somehow, GOP lawmakers including Kooyenga managed to have two brains on the matter, saying this move wasn't political even as they were criticizing the council's efforts to inform politicians of issues on behalf of students -- even as those lawmakers were voting in favor of one of the council's key recommendations! So the jig is up: What this is really all about is who has some power and who has a voice in public policy. And, evidently, in the minds of guys like Kooyenga, power and messaging should belong exclusively to Republicans.

In short: You're free to choose, just so long as you choose Republican. Booyah, Kooyenga! But tell ya what, Dale: I'd like to opt out of paying your state legislator salary. Because I am philosophically opposed to you and your GOP wrecking crew.

Originally posted to Ron Legro on Sat May 25, 2013 at 12:22 PM PDT.

Also republished by Badger State Progressive and Community Spotlight.

Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags


More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

  •  As if Walker... (7+ / 0-)

    wasn't embarrassing enough. Republished to Badger State Progressive.

    No one knows what it's like, To be the bad man, To be the sad man, behind blue eyes....

    by blueyedace2 on Sat May 25, 2013 at 04:38:39 PM PDT

  •  I worked with Dale Kooyenga (3+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    ruleoflaw, exterris, outragedinSF

    during his time with KPMG in Milwaukee.

    I'll say this about Dale:  Good guy....bad ideology.

    "The modern conservative is engaged in one of man's oldest exercises in moral philosophy; that is, the search for a superior moral justification for selfishness." - John Kenneth Galbraith

    by wildcat6 on Sat May 25, 2013 at 05:10:41 PM PDT

  •  This fight is decades old (11+ / 0-)

    When I was much younger, back in the 1970s (almost 40 years ago), colleges in MN were splitting up student fees and giving them to student organizations. At my college, we started up a chess club and got a grant of a couple hundred dollars to buy chess sets. It’s not unusual.

    There was a statewide group called the Minnesota Public Interest Research Group (I checked and it still exists), started in 1972 (Wikipedia link here: MPIRG). They worked on social and environmental issues. A lot of what they did was funded by student fees. Here’s just a little of what they accomplished in the 70s and 80s:

    1972: Conducted a joint study with local unions and state AFL-CIO that resulted in a ban of the use of asbestos in new building construction.

    1974: Helped pass legislation requiring lobbyists to register and disclose spending and contributions.

    1977: MPIRG research and legislation created a state ban on fluorocarbons.

    1978: Passed the Boundary Waters Canoe Area Wilderness Act to create the nation's sole 'paddle-only' wilderness area.

    1983: Sued Northwestern Bell to reduce telephone rates by $69.1 million.

    1984: Mobilized 10,000 citizens statewide to stop the siting of a high-level radioactive waste dump in Minnesota.

    1985: Established a statewide, toll-free Tenant/Landlord hotline.

    1986: Worked with farmers, sports enthusiasts and environmentalists to establish the Reinvest in Minnesota (RIM) program.

    1987: Prevented the deregulation of small business and residential phone service.

    1988: Re-established the Renters Credit property tax refund, which had been cut 33%.

    1989: MPIRG passed the New and Used Car Lemon Laws and obtained $650,000 for consumers in a Solar Tax Credit Class Action lawsuit.

    Over and over again, conservatives whined and complained and tried to get MPIRG defunded because it's a liberal group (I just googled it and apparently it‘s still an issue at various colleges around the state). Some wanted to make it an opt-in choice when college students were paying activity fees.

    Blah blah blah.

    Here’s the thing. Fees are fees and the student government decides how to spend them (even if you don’t play chess, a few pennies of what you pay might go to support chess club). If you want a voice in how the money is spent, run for office.

    Kooyenga says:

    “I am just philosophically opposed to charging people fees for things they don't support."
    Bullshit. If 20% of the Federal Budget goes to the Defense Department and I don’t like that, can I withhold 20% of my taxes? Should individual taxpayers be able to choose which money goes to which department?

    I think not.

    "Stupid just can't keep its mouth shut." -- SweetAuntFanny's grandmother.

    by Dbug on Sat May 25, 2013 at 06:44:07 PM PDT

    •  Indeed (5+ / 0-)

      The Wisconsin Public Interest Research Group also was started by students. And, as in other states, over the years there has been faux outrage at universities in Wisconsin over mandatory student fees that fund campus organizations -- as if this were somehow inefficient or unfair. But as I always say, if you want to belong to a club, you need to pay dues. Even if you don't often or ever actually use the club. And that's the basic reality of government spending, too. Not every dollar benefits you, personally, but it benefits the community and society in measurable ways that uplift everyone. Even those who've already made it, thanks to other government programs. For instance, anyone who's attended a public university and many of the private universities that sprang up in the aftermath of that growth owe their schooling in large measure to the 19th Century's Land Grant Act. And that was a huge government program. Just like NASA, or the Weather Service, or NIH.

  •  Great writing! n/t (2+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    wildcat6, TheDuckManCometh
  •  suburban greed (4+ / 0-)

    The rethugs in waukesha county are a parasite on milwaukee. They have it in reverse. Milwaukee is the economic engine of waukesha and all they do is hate. They do not realize if Brewcity goes down so do they.

         The article is right on, sums up the hypocritcal and condictory nature of the Charlie Sykes js communications SE wi rethugs.

    •  Someday maybe we'll all live in the same reality (2+ / 0-)
      Recommended by:
      TheDuckManCometh, wildcat6

      Meanwhile, in the wingnut-o-verse, government is always bad and business is always good and never the twain shall meet. Except, of course, when wingnuts control the government, too. And right now they've got a large measure of control, especially in many statehouses including Wisconsin.

    •  Apparently, though, this came from Eau Claire... (1+ / 0-)
      Recommended by:

      ...where the United Council of Student Governments member group -- apparently captured by college Republicans -- complained in a letter to another GOP legislator. And from that sprang the entire plot to destroy the entire association, even though continuing referenda on each campus including UW-Eau Claire reaffirmed student satisfaction with the council and its dues. Self-referential politics, indeed. Here's a great blog post on the plot from Cognitive Dissidence:

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site