Skip to main content

These revelations that our government is collecting all our communications didn't shock me. Piss me off? For sure. We lost all pretense to privacy in 2007 when FISA was revamped to allow for warrantless wiretapping. In conjunction with the Patriot Act, we began living in the United Police States of America.

All of Minnesota's media seems to be talking about Sen. Al Franken's role in oversight of the United Police States of America's ever-growing and intrusive surveillance of everybody and everything. But Sen. Amy Klobuchar has been around longer and has a track record of not caring the least about our civil liberties. She voted poorly on FISA every time it's come before the Senate since she joined it in 2007.

In 2007, the Republican-controlled Senate rammed through changes to FISA the night before everyone left town for the August recess. This bill allowed for warrantless wiretapping without any oversight. Klobuchar did what she was told and rubber-stamped it.

When I confronted her in October of 2007 about her unwillingness to protect our civil liberties and our privacy, here's how she responded:

I was really angry with Amy for voting for the FISA legislation that was forced through the Senate the evening before everyone left for the August recess. I felt that she had abandoned our rights and her campaign claim to hold the Bush Administration accountable. She clarified her position and provided a little more insight into the process. I am less angry with her now and feel more confident that she will not allow unsupervised wiretapping of Americans in the future. I'll begin by recapping the issue.


However, she admitted that she wouldn't vote for legislation like this again. She claimed that she wasn't part of the negotiations over this bill and realizes that this is a vote she'd like to have back. [I got an email clarification. She does not regret her vote. Her Aide says "She did say it is not something she will vote for in the long term, and that the version she did vote for could have been better."] Also, this bill didn't go through the Judiciary Committee and was forced through quickly all on that Friday night. She claims that she and the rest of the Committee will carefully examine the upcoming legislation and make sure that American's rights are not ignored again.
(, my old blog)

In December of 2007, Klobuchar voted against retroactive immunity for the telecom's who coughed up all of our phone calls, emails and etc. Without immunity, citizens could have sued over their breach of our privacy rights. She did so again in January of 2008 and I mistakenly thought all was well.

These changes to FISA enacted in 2007 were only temporary and the Senate had to reconsider it in 2008. Sadly, in June of 2008 Klobuchar went back on her promise to protect our privacy and civil rights.

Sen. Amy Klobuchar (D-MN) voted for cloture on the FISA bill yesterday. Now the bill cannot be filibustered and will likely become law. This is the second time that Amy has abandoned the committment she made during her campaign to defend the constitution and our civil rights. The first time was last August when she voted for the first FISA bill (the one that expired in February). So much for standing up for what she claimed to believe in.

I'm sure she will vote against the bill (and issue a press release with strong language about how she opposes it) when it passes, but the real vote was yesterday. She failed us all again.

And here's how she tried to spin it:
It's shameful. My Senator, Amy Klobuchar, blew it by voting for the cloture and attempting to cover her poor vote by having her staff insist that:
"The motion to proceed allows the bill to be debated and amended, which allowed Dodd and Feingold to offer their amendment to strip [telecom] immunity. You'll notice that 13 other senators joined her today [i.e., 13 other Democratic senators who also voted for cloture and against today's final passage]. The motion to proceed was to allow the bill to be debated and amended. Without that, Senators Dodd and Feingold are not able to introduce amendments to improve the legislation."
(Minnesota Independent)

I repeatedly contacted the Senator's office seeking a comment, but only got one brief explanation that was similar to what her staff told the MN Independent. She wins by 20% in a campaign ripe with promises to stand up to the Bush Adminstration ... no more business as usual ... she promised to defend our Constitution. Why couldn't she have stood up for what's right when it mattered most.

I do my best to pay attention to privacy and constitutional issues, but apparently everybody in the progressive community missed the extension of FISA in 2011. The Senate passed all the objectionable provisions of the Patriot Act and FISA in February.

And now everyone is feigning shock that the United Police States of America is capturing all communications and there is no public awareness that this is occurring until some contractor grows a conscience.

Shee it.

It's like getting angry with the weather. Our civil liberties were sold down the river years ago.

Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags


More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

  •  Tip Jar (8+ / 0-)

    MN Progressive Project: MN politics from a progressive perspective plus all the crazy from MN's RWNJs.

    by The Big E on Tue Jun 11, 2013 at 03:00:15 PM PDT

  •  She Voted For The Security Of The US (5+ / 0-)

    Good for her.

    "Don't Let Them Catch You With Your Eyes Closed"

    by rssrai on Tue Jun 11, 2013 at 03:10:20 PM PDT

  •  No evidence provided (0+ / 0-)

    that she voted against our privacy.

    I suggest you take a breath and wait for more details before getting so depressed.

    In further news, Al Franken has now spoken out and says the NSA has nothing to do with spying on American citizens.

    •  Srsly? (0+ / 0-)

      Did you even bother to read the post?

      Did you follow the links?

      MN Progressive Project: MN politics from a progressive perspective plus all the crazy from MN's RWNJs.

      by The Big E on Tue Jun 11, 2013 at 03:32:34 PM PDT

      [ Parent ]

      •  Yes (0+ / 0-)

        I have an issue with the way you massively overstated the issues involved here. The government is not "capturing" all communications - which implies everything we say or write is stored somewhere.

        The act is aimed at non-Americans, and then can only be used after presentation of likelihood of criminal activity. Do you have any evidence that it has been used for anything else?

        For your own good, take a deep breath. Things aren't as dire as you present here.

  •  Funny, I'd expect you to go after Al Franken. (0+ / 0-)

    I mean, between the two Minnesotans......

    ST. PAUL (WCCO) — US Sen. Al Franken, D-Minn., says he’s not surprised by revelations that federal security agencies collect phone and computer data on American citizens.

    The National Security Agency secretly gathered personal data on Americans since 2007, including their internet use and cell phone service. It’s something Franken says he “was very well aware of.”

    “I can assure you, this is not about spying on the American people,” Franken said.

    Franken, who sits on the Senate Judiciary Committee, says he got secret security briefings on the program and he says it prevented unspecified terrorist acts.

    “I have a high level of confidence that this is used to protect us and I know that it has been successful in preventing terrorism,” Franken said.
    •  Not happy w/ him, either (1+ / 0-)
      Recommended by:

      But ... as I noted in my post ... all of MN's media is noting what Al said.

      I'll be writing about him next.

      MN Progressive Project: MN politics from a progressive perspective plus all the crazy from MN's RWNJs.

      by The Big E on Tue Jun 11, 2013 at 03:34:26 PM PDT

      [ Parent ]

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site