Skip to main content

BEGIN Short WTF diary.

There are games of musical chairs that you just don't want to win. Defending the super surveillance state is one of those games.

So, when we hear House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi join those circling the wagons to defend secret agencies empowered by secret laws, funded by secret budgets, and overseen by secret courts to the extent that their activities are secret even to elected officials with top secret clearance, that's not good.

Earlier today I wrote about the value of contributing good stories, as if they were stones in the arches that hold up the collective hall of our civilization. Those stories take many forms: good laws are one set. Another are acts of justice that contradict bad laws.

We are seeing ranks form, and form quickly, on the NSA data mining issue: Those who view the secret architecture of the super surveillance state as founded on good laws - that USA PATRIOT, for example, is darn good, does good stuff and it's a darn shame we can't tell you all about it, because secret. And if anyone were to try to tell you about that double secret awesomeness, then they'd be a whistleblower, which is even worse than 9/11 because.. well. We can't tell you why it's worse than 9/11 to drop dimes on the super secrecy. Because if we told you, we'd be charged with spying, and stuff.

But so long as you don't know what's going on... it's all awesome. Super secret awesome. And stuff!

As for why we must have the super surveillance state, the reasons why roll under that core line from the Declaration of Independence, I guess: We hold these truths to be self-evident.

We'd love to tell you what those truths are... but they're classified.

Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags


More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site