Skip to main content

A German economist has worked out how a cheap deal can make people ignore their personal convictions - and says his study debunks the idea that market forces can iron out unethical practices.
Armin Falk, an economist at the University of Bamberg, set up a series of experiments to figure out how and why our personal convictions so often fly out the window when we are confronted with a possible bargain.

The Frankfurter Rundschau newspaper said Falk and his team figured out it was not just the prospect of getting a good deal that undermined good intentions - being in a competitive market made it even worse.

They ran a series of experiments with mice and students which suggested this was the case.

Read about this disturbing but important experiment here.

EMAIL TO A FRIEND X
Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags

?

More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

  •  They should have used rats as subjects. (4+ / 0-)
    They ran a series of experiments with mice and students which suggested this was the case.
    Then we could have more clearly understood how this applies to Republicans.

    Especially those from Texas.

    "Ridicule is the only weapon which can be used against unintelligible propositions." - Thomas Jefferson

    by rfall on Wed Jun 26, 2013 at 04:24:59 PM PDT

  •  We Ran our Own Experiment On That (6+ / 0-)

    Image Hosted by ImageShack.us

    We are called to speak for the weak, for the voiceless, for victims of our nation and for those it calls enemy.... --ML King "Beyond Vietnam"

    by Gooserock on Wed Jun 26, 2013 at 04:27:51 PM PDT

  •  "Predictably Irrational" by Dan Ariely (3+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    ciganka, Mannie, cynndara

    http://en.wikipedia.org/...

    This book has a number of good studies (well, interesting...I think they are repeatable but their methodology could be cleaned up) about how when market forces intrude on decisions made by people, they make both anti-social decisions AND worse economic ones. When people are guided by concern for their fellow man instead of some market force, they tend to consume less and society works better.

    it fitfully blows, half conceals, half discloses

    by Addison on Wed Jun 26, 2013 at 05:03:25 PM PDT

  •  Exactly. (0+ / 0-)

    A big part of the market influence on behavior is the certain knowledge that your individual action will not change the ultimate outcome: only the extent to which you, personally, profit or lose from the situation.  You know that that mouse is going to die.  The only question is whether you make the money, or someone else does.  Morals can't compete with rational survival behavior; we find that all the time in the context of desperate shortages such as shipwreck and prison camps.  And in the current economic environment, we are all playing a game of musical chairs where there quite obviously aren't enough chairs to go around.

    Capitalism is WRONG.  It deliberately incentivizes the worst in human behavior.  Its claim to virtue was Adam Smith's proposition that it could enlist that worst of human selfishness in processes that provided greater benefit to society overall, but that is no longer the case,  if it ever was (Smith's economy depended upon the extraction of wealth and labor from vast populations of "unpeople" -- Africans, Indians, and convicts).  Society needs rules that blunt and mitigate the natural instincts to hoard, feed, and reproduce, not mechanisms that encourage them.

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site