Skip to main content

I clicked on a link in a post by Kos. It took me to The American Conservative, a nonpartisan think tank offering right wingedness for those allergic to nuts. Get it? Wing Nut? There was this ad, there.

I know a thing or two about wingnut Constitutional ideology. I am long a student of and once a practitioner of U.S. Constitutional Law. But this idea of "Pro-Constitution", as in "Pro-Constitution Movie of the Year" had previously eluded me as a current force in popular thinking. Had I missed something? Had I missed something important?

I went digging a little farther. Follow me out into the tall grass if you want to know what turned up.

Before I even checked out the film, Google led me straight to guns and fear or sharia law when I searched "pro-Constitution".

I actually own both of this guy, Ron Maxwell's, films that are pimped in the promo poster, above. In VHS. You know how it is . . . Dad likes history . . . Dad has Civil War books . . . let's get this for  him for fathers day (with his money, of course). They were young. Sigh.

These films were actually TV miniseries about the Civil War, sort of a straight to video thing. Historically, they aren't abysmally inaccurate, but it's clear enough that Mr. Maxwell loves him some ole time Southern gentlefolk and the heroic leaders of defeated Dixie.

BTW, Dad does love him some history And even before looking into the film itself or the book on which it is based, Dad knew from the title that the film was likely to be about Copperheads, as that term was used during the Civil War, to describe people in the Union, who thought it better to let the South go peacefully with whatever institutions it desired to burden itself with. Then I checked. Too right.

Here is the book. Here is the film.

So, what is the story of Copperhead? Those prone to queasiness should stop reading now.

Copperhead is the great untold Civil War story. Far from the Virginia battlefields whose names etch our history, the war of Copperhead visits the devastation and unimaginable loss of a civil war upon a family and a community whose strength and very existence are tested by fire, rope, knife, and betrayal. This is the Civil War come home.
They are talking about "the bloody and contentious autumn of 1862" in New York. To which I, as an amateur with a lifetime, if dilettantish interest in American History in general and Civil War History in particular, say, huh?

I have never before heard of unconstitutional exertions by fire, rope, knife, and betrayal against the good people of upstate New York in the Autumn of 1862 or any other time. If such a thing had actually ever occurred, you would think that some mention of it might have leaked onto the New Your History page on Wikipedia. You would think the film's promoters would at least try to work something in there, with the premiere this week and all.

But, I guess that being pro-Constitutional doesn't mean being faithful to objective reality or actual history. Mythologies are perfectly acceptable explanations for events as well. Sigh.

So, now here come the "PRO-CONSTITUTIONAL" people, demanding their rights, just like the founding fathers blessed them. Never mind that stuff included slavery. Never mind that ripped the country through it's only nation-breaking Constitutional Crisis. Why? Because Islam scares them, as do people who aren't white and science.

Dare I say this? They cling to their guns and religion. The good news is that they can't maintain their demographic position. As a rear guard action, they try to steal the Constitution for their own on their way out the door.

They can't have it.

Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags


More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site