Skip to main content

President Barack Obama announces the nomination of former Ohio Attorney General Richard Cordray, right, as the first director of the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) during a statement in the Rose Garden of the White House, July 18, 2011. At le
Reappoint him, Mr. President.
Think Progress's Ian Millhiser spoke with Majority Leader Harry Reid's office and determined that the Senate will not be holding pro forma sessions during the Fourth of July recess. That means, should President Obama want to do so, he could use the recess to reappoint the nominees whose recess appointments are expiring, or some of his new nominees.

But what about the D.C. Court of Appeals ruling that Obama's recess appointments to the National Labor Relations Board and the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau that the president's recess appointment power only exists for the very brief period every two year between Congresses?

This widely criticized opinion, however, is unlikely to be upheld by the Supreme Court because it would require the justices to retroactively invalidate literally hundreds of recess appointments in just the last several presidencies.

Significantly, while the Supreme Court agreed to review the D.C. Circuit’s decision, it asked the parties to brief an additional question that the lower court did not decide in its sweeping opinion—“[w]hether the President’s recess-appointment power may be exercised when the Senate is convening every three days in pro forma sessions.” This is a strong indication that the justices may be willing to uphold the power of pro forma sessions to nix the recess appointments power, but they are not willing to cast the past actions of hundreds of former government officials in doubt.

Obama has definitely become more confrontational in his appointment-making. His three nominations to D.C. Circuit were made in the face of escalated Republican threats to eliminate seats to that court. This week, he made three more nominations to district courts. The White House has also reportedly given its support to a filibuster reform effort in the Senate, telling Reid that Vice President Joe Biden would use his 51st vote to change the rules, if necessary.

If Obama really wants to take Senate GOP obstruction head on, he could take the opportunity the Senate recess is providing and reappoint the expiring NLRB and CFPB nominees. Millhiser argues that doing this would "cut off the strongest legal argument against his current recess appointees," that argument being that recess appointments during pro forma sessions aren't allowed, but those appointments during full recesses are. If the Court were to invalidate the appointments, it would invalidate everything that the NRLB and CFPB has done while these recess-appointed directors held office.  That would have to be a factor in the Court's decision-making.

Reappointing them would be strong, decisive move, showing Republicans that their obstruction has finally become reached the limits of what the White House will put up with.

Clearly, re-opening filibuster reform is the solution—or we will see this quagmire over and over again. Tell your Democratic Senator to re-open filibuster reform.

Originally posted to Joan McCarter on Fri Jun 28, 2013 at 12:06 PM PDT.

Also republished by Daily Kos.

Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags


More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site