Skip to main content

In some ways these stories are even worse than those Video Stories -- When Animals Attack.

At least the Animals have a good excuse, in most of the cases: they've been provoked; they're acting on instinct; they're hungry.

What excuse do the Background Creators have, when they stomp on our futures, without a care in the world?

These Database Fate-casters usually have just screwed up when crunching their complex data. Data from dozens of different databases; Data that often cannot be easily matched.

Background Screening Industry Focused on Accuracy after Stories of Background Checks Gone Wrong

by Tom Ahearn, ESR News Editor, -- January 11, 2013

The blog cites five stories about inaccurate background checks that include:
    -- A man with information on his background check indicating he was convicted for two counts of embezzlement. A county criminal record check proved he had the same name and middle initial of the embezzler, but a different birthday.

    -- A woman was fired for lying on her application when a background check conducted by her employer turned up a criminal conviction of her similarly named twin brother. The woman cleared up the mistake and got her job back.

    -- A woman was surprised to find out that she was “digitally dead” and unable to use her own debit cards, credit cards, and checks after mix up at a credit reporting agency.


Background checks prone to mistakes, can shut out jobs

November 20, 2012 --

Somehow, Darlene T. Martinez was confused with Darlene Foster Ramirez, who was found guilty in 2009 of dangerous-drug possession in Navajo County. The hospital rescinded the job offer, and Martinez was left scrambling to remove another person's felony from her record and find a new job.

The case highlights questions about the accuracy of background checks, which legal experts say can be filled with errors because of incomplete databases and confused identities. These errors can be difficult to fix, costing applicants job opportunities and disrupting livelihoods.

That last story really gets me, the only thing matching between Job Applicant and Convicted Person is:  'Darlene -. -a---i-ez'  (where - are wildcards).

Do you think that Soundex Matching algorithm ("Sounds Like") may have a ethnic bias?  How about any built-in bias for inaccurate record linking?  (Contrary to popular belief, "Computers are NOT always Right" -- far from it sometimes.)

It would almost be funny, if only 'When Computers Attack' stories weren't so damn tragic -- in terms of people's careers, livelihoods, and family well-being.

I'm sure Darlene T. Martinez did nothing wrong, that warranted her being denied the Job, she desperately needed.  

How many other 'Darlene -. -a---i-ez' are there out there, who get computer-branded like this (with someone else's history), and then lose the Job -- and never even find out why, they keep NOT getting the Mc'Job, time and time again?

Ever have to fight with the Credit Rating Agencies -- to "Clean up your Credit History" of their inaccuracies?

Good luck with that. I tried once. My accounts long since closed and paid off were still being listed as "currently active" and a few were even "in default" (even though, they had been "Paid in Full").  After about a year's worth of letter writing to my ancient Creditors and then duplicate copies of their replies back to TRW (now known as Experian), some of my College Loan history finally began to 'reflect reality.'

BUT ... then I was told, there were 2 other Credit Rating Agencies out there, I would have to do the same data dance with. If not I could take my chances, they might update 'their records' based on TRW updates -- OR they might not.  It was up to them, and their computer algorithms.  

My 'Credit History' did not belong to me. It was What they said It Was.  And some decades later, I am still an apartment dweller, and not a home owner.

Well the same can now be said about our 'Personal Credibility History' -- it no longer belongs to us. It is what THEY SAY IT IS.

We've been Verified!

You are only a few easy steps away from uncovering the truth about someone’s background! With over 1 billion records our instant nationwide search system allows for unlimited look ups and accesses data from multiple databases to compile the most comprehensive reports available.

Start your 5 Day trial today!

Our Deep Web Search tool is an easy way of locating important information about people.

Scan the internet to find:

    Professional interests
    Social Networking Profiles
    Archives and publications
    And other!

Our Background Investigation services can help you uncover information people do not want you to know.

Reports include:

    Court Records
    Marriage/Divorce Records
    Birth Records
    Death Records
    Property Records
    Asset Information

It's a not-so Brave New World that we're blithely accepting. A world full of unaccountable Computer Algorithms, creating our destinies, that we might otherwise have never had.

Good Luck with that, Americans; especially if you ever have to try and correct your Been-Verified record, so that it might actually 'reflect reality.'

We are slowly becoming whatever they say we are. They got your 'Permanent Record' out there somewhere -- Shoot they created it! ... All without a guarantee of accuracy, in entire the computer-linked world.

Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags


More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site