Skip to main content

I believe I've identified the tiny political miscalculation responsible for the apparently imminent demise of immigration reform in the GOP-controlled House. Just in case there are any GOP strategists lurking around here, let me clarify one thing:

Contrary to what you may have heard, not all us white voters are totally selfish, xenophobic racists.  Some of us are - gasp - occasionally a little concerned about other people, even if they don't look exactly like us..

Now, lest some of you doubt that this misconception does not exist, allow me to quote liberally - below the fold - from today's Plum Line.

Greg Sargeant writes today:

the argument that Republicans don’t really need to improve their standing much among Latinos to be competitive in national elections is gaining real ground among Republicans — posing a serious threat to immigration reform. The emerging case is that Republicans mainly need to do even better among whites — by doing a better job energizing white supporters and by bringing in more “missing” white voters who might be inclined to vote Republican — thus relieving them of the inconvenient need to alienate their base with anything that might persuade Latinos to give their party a second look.
Summarizing a post by Nate Cohn, Greg elaborates why the GOP can't just reject immigration reform with the plan of winning more white votes:
Nate Cohn published what may be the most comprehensive piece yet attempting to debunk this notion, which was perhaps best laid out by Sean Trende the other day. Cohn’s piece is well worth reading in full, but here is the summary version:

1) If Republicans are going to increase their performance among white voters even further, they will have to moderate on social issues in ways that will be discomfiting to the base in any case; Republicans will have to “pick their poison.

2) The whites-only theory of the case depends on the GOP continuing to improve its standing among whites going forward. While this is currently happening, GOP gains among them are largely regional — focused in the south and in Appalachia. At the same time, Democrats may be gaining among whites outside these regions, which, if it continues, could “cement the Democratic edge in the Electoral College.” This is being exacerbated by the aforementioned refusal to moderate on cultural issues — particularly in key suburban areas.

3) The notion that the GOP’s future hopes turn largely on boosting turnout among “missing white voters” who didn’t turn out in 2012 is complicated by the fact that many of these voters might vote Democratic. This could be made even worse by the fact that many missing whites were young voters. Over time, if the next generation of young voters is as liberal as this one, it could push the national white voter further leftward. Cohn concludes:

    Conservatives take solace in the possibility that they could win with gains through whites, presumably on the assumption that the changes needed for gains among non-southern white voters will be less painful than embracing immigration reform. To the extent that this assumption is informed by the view that the GOP is making broad, steady gains among white voters, it is wrong. The GOP has a tough road ahead.

I would put it more simply.  The GOP is failing to appreciate that alienating the brown people does not necessarily translate into more white votes.  

Or to put it differently, even setting aside all of the economic arguments for immigration reform, there are a lot of white voters out there who like to consider themselves somewhat compassionate and truly want to help families who are being torn apart by the current immigration policies.

In other words, steadfastly opposing a path to citizenship may well cost the GOP not just with minority voters, but with white voters too.

Thus endeth today's help-the-GOP-strategist-moment.  

Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags


More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

  •  True, but I know a lot of them who are (4+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    JeffW, tuesdayschilde, Mayfly, Linda1961

    happy to pretend that GOP candidates are not racist xenophobes or at least willing to cater to them.

    Nonetheless I take your point and know as well many white voters who will never, ever vote Republican for this very reason. So, net (especially when Republicans also hate women) they have adopted a truly losing political strategy.

    We have only just begun and none too soon.

    by global citizen on Tue Jul 09, 2013 at 11:46:59 AM PDT

  •  The Republicans could Priority Mail... (3+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    Mayfly, DrPlacebo, Linda1961

    ...$1 million in random, unmarked $100 bills, disguised as eBay purchases from Fargo, ND, to every middle-aged white registered voter to buy their votes, and they still wouldn't win.

    But it would be a hell of a stimulus!

    And it might break the billionaires of wasting their money on the Republicans.

    Float like a manhole cover, sting like a sash weight! Clean Coal Is A Clinker!

    by JeffW on Tue Jul 09, 2013 at 11:50:37 AM PDT

    •  The billionaires don't waste their money-they're (0+ / 0-)

      getting a lot of public funds to private pockets action.

      The right of the women of this State to be secure in their persons against unreasonable searches shall not be violated by the State legislature.

      by Mayfly on Tue Jul 09, 2013 at 01:34:36 PM PDT

      [ Parent ]

  •  Alienating brown voters (2+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    tuesdayschilde, Mayfly

    Alienates a major portion of white voters too and the share increases as younger people start voting and older ones die off.  

    My response to the GOP here is "Please proceed, Governor"

    Touch all that arises with a spirit of compassion. An activist seeks to change opinion.

    by Mindful Nature on Tue Jul 09, 2013 at 11:56:13 AM PDT

    •  Walking around in this part of IN (3+ / 0-)

      Okay, maybe my hometown and my current locations are glaring exceptions to the rule, but there are an awful lot of multiracial families and biracial families around.  It's pretty hard to vote against your granddaughter's interests.  

      "Politics should be the part-time profession of every citizen who would protect the rights and privileges of free people and who would preserve what is good and fruitful in our national heritage." -- Lucille Ball

      by Yamaneko2 on Tue Jul 09, 2013 at 01:33:54 PM PDT

      [ Parent ]

  •  He also fails to recognize that the majority of (2+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    tuesdayschilde, Mayfly

    those "missing White voters" were Southern.  How many Southern states did Obama win again?  And a lot of the others were in Northeastern states where Obama's margin was huge and their votes wouldn't have made a difference.

    Republican "Missing White Voter Strategy"

    "Nothing in all the world is more dangerous than sincere ignorance and conscientious stupidity." --M. L. King "You can't fix stupid" --Ron White -6.00, -5.18

    by zenbassoon on Tue Jul 09, 2013 at 12:09:23 PM PDT

  •  Thus endeth today's help-the-GOP-strategist-moment (1+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:

    Let them spew.
    It kinda clarifies things.

    If I ran this circus, things would be DIFFERENT!

    by CwV on Tue Jul 09, 2013 at 01:28:38 PM PDT

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site