Skip to main content

U.S. District Court Judge Denise L. Cote has ruled that Apple, Inc. “played a central role in facilitating and executing” a conspiracy with five big publishers to raise the price that consumers pay for e-books, not only at Apple's online store but at competing sellers like and Barnes & Noble.

Some background: While futurists and technologist had predicted the rise of the electronic book for decades, it was the 2007 launch of the Amazon Kindle that made the e-book a mainstream consumer item. sold e-books using the wholesale model that traditional booksellers had used for decades, whereby the retailer buys books from the publishers for an agreed-upon set price, usually about half of the recommended cover price, and is then free to sell the book to consumers at whatever price the retailer wants. Amazon famously sold most popular titles for $9.99, which was usually several dollars less than the corresponding hardback and trade paperback prices, and a price point that many credit with getting the e-book market off the ground.

Then in 2010, as many Kindle owners unhappily discovered, e-books that had cost $9.99 suddenly started to cost 30-50 percent more. In many cases, the Kindle version of a popular book—which uses no paper or ink, requires no labor to manufacture, and does not need to be shipped either from the publisher to Amazon or from Amazon to you—would cost almost as much as or even more than the traditional version.

This was no coincidence. In 2010, Apple was preparing to introduce the first iPad, and wanted a piece of the potentially lucrative e-book market.  When negotiating with publishers to sell their works online, Apple had proposed that they move from the wholesale model to the so-called "agency model," whereby the publisher would set the retail price of the book and the retailer would take a cut of the price. If the publishers were to enforce this agency model with other online sellers, Apple reasoned, they would wipe out any price advantage Amazon and others would be able to claim. By coordinating this transition itself, federal prosecutors argued, Apple crossed the line into unlawful collusion. Today, the judge agreed.

In the end, it was the words of Apple's late CEO Steve Jobs that did as much as anything else to convict the company, as the New York Times story explains:

One e-mail, written by Steven P. Jobs when he was chief executive of Apple, was frequently brought up at the trial. In an e-mail conversation with Mr. Cue about the contracts negotiated with the publishers, Mr. Jobs wrote: “I can live with this, as long as they move Amazon to the agent model too for new releases for the first year. If they don’t, I’m not sure we can be competitive.” The Justice Department said this showed Apple’s intent to help the publishers push Amazon to the agency model so they could raise e-book prices....

Judge Cote said the words of Mr. Jobs were compelling evidence against Apple. They showed that Mr. Jobs, who died in 2011, was aware that the publishers were unhappy with Amazon’s pricing of $9.99 for e-books, and that Apple’s entry would drive up prices across the industry.

In one famous instance, Mr. Jobs made comments to a reporter after he introduced the iPad and the iBookstore in January 2010. When asked why consumers would purchase an e-book from Apple’s store instead of, where e-books were $9.99, Mr. Jobs replied, “The prices will be the same.”

“Apple has struggled mightily to reinterpret Jobs' statements in a way that will eliminate their bite,” Judge Cote said. “Its efforts have proven fruitless.”

What does this mean for consumers? It's hard to say. A trial for damages will follow this one, but it's not clear to me whether the publishers can or will be made to return to the wholesale model for e-books, so it's possible that we may be paying the price for this unlawful collusion for decades to come. If nothing else, though, this verdict proves that antitrust law isn't yet dead in the United States.

Originally posted to phenry on Wed Jul 10, 2013 at 07:57 AM PDT.

Also republished by Progressive Friends of the Library Newsletter.

Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags


More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

  •  Wahooooooo!!! (8+ / 0-)

    I bought a kindle, and then took a shocked look at what they were charging for e-books, and returned to paperbacks.    I can get a good paperback in Dollar General for about $3.  

    Some of my favorite authors have banded together on their own sites, selling their own downloads, to escape from the Amazon monopoly.   The authors don't like it any better than the readers.

    It has been as bad as "ticketmaster".

    •  I got an email last fall from Barnes and Noble (1+ / 0-)
      Recommended by:

      saying that I may be eligible for book credits because of a lawsuit -- which I'm sure is this one. It said to look for it sometime in mid-2013. So if I got that email I'm sure a lot of people did, so maybe we will all get book credits, except as you said, Phenry, there will be a trial for damages which may stretch it out further. I wonder too if Barnes and Noble's financial problems and divesting Nook will affect this? I guess we will see eventually.

      "We don't see things as they are, we see things as we are." Anais Nin

      by SuWho on Wed Jul 10, 2013 at 10:13:59 AM PDT

      [ Parent ]

      •  I despise Barnes and Noble (0+ / 0-)

        They cost an arm and a leg, and want to charge you an outrageous amount to join an annual savings club, so that they will only charge you an arm and half a leg.   Other retailers offer these discount cards for free.

        I despise Barnes and Noble and make it a policy never to shop there.

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site