Skip to main content

I like to go to the Wikipedia main page  to see the "Did you know" and "On this day" sections. And no, Wikipedia, I did not know that a Pennsylvania court ruled in 1978 that forcing someone to donate bone marrow to save someone else's life is unacceptable!

Why have I never heard of this case before with regards to abortion rights??

More below the jump.

The judge John P. Flaherty Jr. wrote that "For our law to compel [the] defendant to submit to an intrusion of his body would change every concept and principle upon which our society is founded. To do so would defeat the sanctity of the individual, and would impose a rule which would know no limits, and one could not imagine where the line would be drawn."

Why are mandatory transvaginal ultrasounds not challenged with this precedent?? It seems like if your body may not be intruded even to save the life of another human being, it DEFINITELY may not be intruded for a medically unnecessary but mandated-by-law procedure?

To go even further: could not the case be made, via McFall v. Shimp, that a woman with an unwanted pregnancy (regardless of whether the pregnancy is a result of a rape, although the case would be exceptionally strong in that circumstance), is entitled to refuse to host an embryo any longer?

I'm not a legal expert; it's just an angle and a court case I had not known about, and I thought I'd share. I can add this to my repertoire of court cases to cite when I argue with trolls about abortion rights.

EMAIL TO A FRIEND X
Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags

?

More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site