Skip to main content

Senator Jeff Merkley (D. OR) isn't crazy about the idea of Larry Summers to be the new chairman of the Federal Reserve and it's completely understandable:

Director of the National Economic Council Lawrence Summers arrives for the tax cut extension bill to be signed President Obama during a ceremony at the Eisenhower Executive Office Building in the White House complex, Friday, Dec. 17, 2010, in Washington. Obama is expected to announce a replacement for Summers early in the new year, soon after he returns to Washington from his Hawaiian vacation. (AP Photo/J. Scott Applewhite)
When he served as Treasury chief under Clinton, Summers helped clinch the law that revoked the Depression-era Glass-Steagall Act, which separated investment banking activities from those of commercial, deposit-taking institutions.

That opened the gate for commercial banks to get involved in riskier financial products, such as the credit default swaps that were at the heart of the 2007-2009 financial crisis., a liberal group that provided major support to both Obama presidential campaigns, is circulating a petition entitled: "Don't let Larry Summers head the Fed," which accuses him of laying the groundwork for the deep U.S. recession.

Senate Banking Committee member Jeff Merkley, a Democrat from Oregon, told Reuters he would find a nomination of Summers "disconcerting."

"Many questions need to be asked and answered related to his philosophy of regulation and deregulation," he said. - Reuters, 7/26/13

Plus there's also this about Summers:

The second thing that I think one has to recognize is present is what I would call the combination of, and here, I'm focusing on something that would seek to answer the question of why is the pattern different in science and engineering, and why is the representation even lower and more problematic in science and engineering than it is in other fields. And here, you can get a fair distance, it seems to me, looking at a relatively simple hypothesis. It does appear that on many, many different human attributes—height, weight, propensity for criminality, overall IQ, mathematical ability, scientific ability—there is relatively clear evidence that whatever the difference in means—which can be debated—there is a difference in the standard deviation, and variability of a male and a female population. And that is true with respect to attributes that are and are not plausibly, culturally determined. If one supposes, as I think is reasonable, that if one is talking about physicists at a top twenty-five research university, one is not talking about people who are two standard deviations above the mean. And perhaps it's not even talking about somebody who is three standard deviations above the mean. But it's talking about people who are three and a half, four standard deviations above the mean in the one in 5,000, one in 10,000 class. Even small differences in the standard deviation will translate into very large differences in the available pool substantially out. I did a very crude calculation, which I'm sure was wrong and certainly was unsubtle, twenty different ways. I looked at the Xie and Shauman paper-looked at the book, rather-looked at the evidence on the sex ratios in the top 5% of twelfth graders. If you look at those-they're all over the map, depends on which test, whether it's math, or science, and so forth, but 50% women, one woman for every two men, would be a high-end estimate from their estimates. From that, you can back out a difference in the implied standard deviations that works out to be about 20%. And from that, you can work out the difference out several standard deviations. If you do that calculation—and I have no reason to think that it couldn't be refined in a hundred ways—you get five to one, at the high end. Now, it's pointed out by one of the papers at this conference that these tests are not a very good measure and are not highly predictive with respect to people's ability to do that. And that's absolutely right. But I don't think that resolves the issue at all. Because if my reading of the data is right—it's something people can argue about—that there are some systematic differences in variability in different populations, then whatever the set of attributes are that are precisely defined to correlate with being an aeronautical engineer at MIT or being a chemist at Berkeley, those are probably different in their standard deviations as well. So my sense is that the unfortunate truth—I would far prefer to believe something else, because it would be easier to address what is surely a serious social problem if something else were true—is that the combination of the high-powered job hypothesis and the differing variances probably explains a fair amount of this problem. - The National Journal, 7/24/13
So yeah, Summers is a pretty bad choice.  So Merkley is doing the right thing and joining the call to get President Obama to instead nominate Fed Vice Chairman Janet Yellen:.

More below the fold.

“This prescience speaks to her independence, intellectual rigor, and willingness to challenge conventional wisdom regarding deregulation -- essential traits for a successful Fed chairman,” the senators wrote, while also highlighting her “significant monetary policy experience.”

The letter campaign, led by Senator Sherrod Brown of Ohio, demonstrates the support that Yellen is gaining for the nomination and the struggle that Summers may face in winning Senate confirmation, if nominated.

Senators Jeff Merkley of Oregon and Tom Harkin of Iowa are among the senators who’ve signed the letter. Brown said earlier this week he supported Yellen.

“She’s done well as part of the Fed in the last months and months,” Brown, a member of the Senate Banking Committee, said in an interview on July 23. “She really has been a cool, smart head. To mix metaphors here, she has her hand on the public pulse, I think, better than your traditional Fed governors or presidents, and I think that would matter.” - Bloomberg, 7/26/13
A third of the Senate Democrats have signed the letter and that includes Senators Dianne Feinstein (D. CA), Barbara Boxer (D. CA), Angus King (I. ME) and Senate Majority Whip Dick Durbin (D. IL).  You know who else is a big fan of Yellen being the new chairman of the Federal Reserve?  Nancy Pelosi:

House Democratic Leader Nancy Pelosi said that while Lawrence Summers and Janet Yellen, considered two of the frontrunners for chairman of the U.S. Federal Reserve, are well-qualified candidates, “it would be great to have a woman.”

Yellen is “extremely talented,” the California congresswoman said in an interview on Bloomberg Television’s “Political Capital with Al Hunt,” airing this weekend.

Pelosi said Yellen and Summers both “understand the responsibility of the Fed chairman” and would be “excellent.” She described Summers as “a patriotic leader in our country, working hard.” - Bloomberg Businessweek, 7/26/13

Picking Yellen would make progressives like Merkley happy and President Obama would have another opportunity to make history with Yellen being the first female to head the Federal Reserve.  President Obama will have until September to make his decision so we should keep up the pressure to get Obama to choose Yellen.  I'm sure Merkley will be one of the top Senators to help apply the pressure.  

Since it's Friday, I'll fill you all in on what else Merkley's been up to lately.  Merkley also introduced two new pieces of legislation aimed to help middle class families with new home refinancing options:

UNITED STATES - JANUARY 31: Sen. Jeff Merkley, D-Ore., speaks during the news conference to oppose the chained Consumer Price Index to cut benefits for Social Security and disabled veterans on Thursday, Jan. 31, 2013. (Photo By Bill Clark/CQ Roll Call)
Today, Oregon’s Senator Jeff Merkley introduced the Rebuilding American Homeownership Act to help middle class families by providing new refinancing options for homeowners. The bill would allow underwater homeowners who currently have no option to refinance to lock into a lower interest rate and reduce their monthly payments, putting more cash back in their pockets and increasing their chances of staying in their homes.

Merkley also introduced the Rebuilding Equity Act, which would cover closing costs for underwater homeowners who refinance into shorter-term loans to rebuild their equity more quickly.

The Rebuilding American Homeownership Act would modify HARP in the following ways:
Allow loans that lack a government guarantee to be refinanced through HARP.
Direct the GSEs to price for the risk they would be assuming, so that the program has no net cost.
Establish an automatic sunset for this program after 24 or 36 months, much like the Home Owners’ Loan Corporation during the Great Depression.

The Rebuilding Equity Act would modify HARP to cover $1,000 in closing costs for underwater homeowners who choose loan terms of 20 years or less to rebuild equity in their homes more quickly. Both CBO and Fannie Mae have estimated that this bill would have no net cost, because it would reduce the severity of financial loss when defaults do occur. - Real Estate Rama, 7/25/13

He's also helping out in the fight to stop domestic surveillance:

In the Senate, Utah’s Mike Lee (a Republican) and Oregon’s Jeff Merkley (a Democrat) brought back the Ending Secret Law Act that they couldn’t pass when FISA was reauthorized. Oregon Sen. Ron Wyden and Colorado Sen. Mark Udall, both Democrats, introduced legislation to restrict NSA data collection unless the material contained a “demonstrated link to terrorism or espionage.”

At the time, the lack of quick action on those bills suggested that the Snowden story had been a blip. Privacy advocates in Congress now refer to those bills as the first wave, part of a strategy of attrition that will make the current policy politically untenable. - Slate, 7/25/13

He's also still fighting Monsanto:

Fortunately for us, we have the support of Sen. Jeff Merkley, who wants to make sure Americans know if the food we consume has been genetically modified or not. Whether you consume fast food or make it to your local farmer’s market every weekend, it is important to know if our food is genetically modified if you want to know. This is what the Genetically Engineered Food Right-to-Know Act is all about.

Sen. Merkley speaks out against MPA: “That outcome is unfortunate and unacceptable because the content of the policy rider is nothing short of astounding. It allows the unrestricted sale and planting of new variants of genetically modified seeds that a court ruled have not been properly examined for their effect on other farmers, the environment, and human health.”

Sen. Debbie Stabenow (D-Mich.) has agreed to back the Genetically Engineered Food Right-to-Know Act. This is inspiring because most folks find it hard to compete with the millions of corporate dollars that most likely inspired the secret addition. - PolicyMic, 7/22/13

The House version of the Genetically Engineered Food Right-to-Know Act has 38 co-sponsors and the majority of the co-sponsors are Democrats.  You can sign the petition to get your Senator to back the Genetically Engineered Food Right-to-Know Act here:

Merkley's also been looking out for homeless veterans:

Oregon’s Senator Jeff Merkley today announced $1.3 million in new funding for Transition Projects Inc., to help homeless veterans and their families find housing and other services to get them back on their feet. This funding comes from the Supportive Services for Veterans Families (SSVF) program within the Veterans Administration (VA).

After noticing that Oregon had only received one SSVF grant in 2011, Senator Merkley’s office convened a meeting of veterans and housing advocates to let them know about the SSVF program and the opportunity for future grant opportunities to help Oregon veterans. In the following years, Oregon grant funding has dramatically increased. In 2012, organizations in Oregon received six grants totaling $2.5 million and Oregon was the second highest awarded state, behind only Florida.

“Too many of our heroes are coming home from overseas tours and are dealing with tremendous challenges getting back into their civilian life. And too many of those heroes end up losing their homes and sleeping in shelters or on the street,” said Merkley. “This grant will help get our veterans secure the help they need to get back on track and a roof over their heads.” - eNews Park Forest, 7/26/13

And he's looking out for the Chetco River:

The Department of the Interior approved a mineral withdrawal today for 17 miles of southwest Oregon’s Chetco River for the next five years.

Public Land Order 7819 withdraws 5,610 acres of National Forest land from mining along the Wild and Scenic Chetco River.

There have been proposals for large-scale gold-mining along the Chetco as recently as 2010. The act follows in the footsteps of a 20 year mineral withdrawal on the Illinois River, another southwest Oregon stream in the Kalmiopsis Wilderness area where environmentalists and miners have regularly clashed.

The mineral withdrawal was at the request of the Rogue River-Siskiyou National Forest in aid of the legislation introduced by Senator Ron Wyden (D-OR) Senator Jeff Merkley (D-OR) and Representative Peter DeFazio (D-OR). - Statesman Journal, 7/26/13

Lets make sure that we send Merkley back to the Senate next year.  You can go here if you want to donate or get involved with his re-election campaign:

Originally posted to pdc on Fri Jul 26, 2013 at 08:52 PM PDT.

Also republished by Koscadia, PDX Metro, Military Community Members of Daily Kos, Climate Hawks, The Democratic Wing of the Democratic Party, and Daily Kos Oregon.

Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags


More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

  •  Goodbye, Larry! White Men Can't Krunk (5+ / 0-)
    "Many questions need to be asked and answered related to his philosophy of regulation and deregulation," he said. - Reuters, 7/26/13
    ....It is after all not the case that the role of women in science is the only example of a group that is significantly underrepresented in an important activity and whose underrepresentation contributes to a shortage of role models for others who are considering being in that group. To take a set of diverse examples, the data will, I am confident, reveal that Catholics are substantially underrepresented in investment banking, which is an enormously high-paying profession in our society; that white men are very substantially underrepresented in the National Basketball Association; and that Jews are very substantially underrepresented in farming and in agriculture....
    Turning to the issue of women in science, he said that he believed that the most important reason for the gender gap was the same reason fewer women fill top positions in many "high-powered" professions: They are less likely than men to work the long hours expected for advancement in these careers. He noted that the women who are in senior positions are "disproportionately either unmarried or without children."
    Noting the long hours of work required to move ahead, he said, "It is a fact about our society that that is a level of commitment that a much higher fraction of married men have been historically prepared to make than of married women."

    Warning - some snark may be above‽ (-9.50; -7.03)‽ eState4Column5©2013 "I’m not the strapping young Muslim socialist that I used to be" - Barack Obama 04/27/2013

    by annieli on Fri Jul 26, 2013 at 09:02:31 PM PDT

  •  Bernanke isn't done til January, nominee will (1+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:

    come in October at earliest.

  •  Yellen isn't half as impressive, (5+ / 0-)

    as far as I can tell, as Christina Romer. I'm just baffled as to how Yellen has become a progressive hero. She's worlds better than Summers, and she seems perfectly adequate and professional. But is that where we want to invest our attention?

    It just feels to me like we're pre-negotiating with ourselves. Couldn't we at least ask for a real progressive, and then settle for an excellent functionary?

    "Gussie, a glutton for punishment, stared at himself in the mirror."

    by GussieFN on Fri Jul 26, 2013 at 09:24:38 PM PDT

    •  Excellent points! Is Romer interested in the (3+ / 0-)
      Recommended by:
      GussieFN, eztempo, RiveroftheWest

      position?  You should write a diary about that.  I'd read it.  I like to be persuaded.

      Funny Stuff at

      by poopdogcomedy on Fri Jul 26, 2013 at 09:29:49 PM PDT

      [ Parent ]

      •  I've no idea if she's interested! (3+ / 0-)
        Recommended by:
        eztempo, Klusterpuck, RiveroftheWest

        I don't even know if Summers and Yellen are interested.

        I've just read that Romer actually was the smartest person in the room, when Summers thought he was, and that Yellen is very much an establishment-type choice, who has been the vice chair with a minimum of boat-rocking. So I'm having a hard time understanding how Yellen is getting all the love here.

        But honestly, that's the extent of what I know. I guess I could write a very short diary ...

        "Gussie, a glutton for punishment, stared at himself in the mirror."

        by GussieFN on Fri Jul 26, 2013 at 09:34:24 PM PDT

        [ Parent ]

    •  Exactly. Little sunlight between Summers & Yellin (2+ / 0-)
      Recommended by:
      GussieFN, RiveroftheWest

      folks just don't like Summers personally.  

      If you're not talking about what billionaire hedgefund bankster Peter G. Peterson is up to you're having the wrong conversations.

      by Jacoby Jonze on Sat Jul 27, 2013 at 08:48:12 AM PDT

      [ Parent ]

  •  Summers, more than anyone else... (5+ / 0-)

    was the architect of the financial meltdown of 2008, thanks to his advocating a repeal of the  Glass–Steagall legislation.    

    Considering how many lives he has played a role in destroying, this is someone who, if life was just, should be behind prison bars, let alone be considered for the position of Fed Chair.

    To say that he is the scum of the earth would be a complement.

    The modern conservative is engaged in one of man's oldest exercises in moral philosophy; that is, the search for a superior moral justification for selfishness. -- John Kenneth Galbraith

    by richardak on Fri Jul 26, 2013 at 09:37:28 PM PDT

  •  Why would obama pick summers? (2+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    Klusterpuck, RiveroftheWest

    It makes no sense.

    What we call god is merely a living creature with superior technology & understanding. If their fragile egos demand prayer, they lose that superiority.

    by agnostic on Sat Jul 27, 2013 at 12:24:37 AM PDT

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site