Skip to main content

We heard in bobswern's diary how Glenn Greenwald claims private contractors can spy on trillions of emails and defied the NSA to deny his claims.

“The NSA has trillions of telephone calls and email in their databases. What these programs are are very simple screens, like the ones that supermarket clerks or shipping and receiving clerks use, where all an analyst has to do is enter an email address or an IP address, and it does two things: it searches that database and lets them listen to the calls or read the emails of everything that the NSA has stored, or look at the browsing histories or Google search terms that you’ve entered; and it also alerts them to any further activity that people connected to that email address or connected to that IP address do in the future. And it’s all done with no need to go to a court, with no need to even get supervisor approval on the part of the analyst.”

Immediately afterwards, Sen. Saxby Chambliss appeared on the same program , to dismiss any concerns about the NSA (or its contractors) spying on citizens and resulting loss of Constitutionally guaranteed privacy.

 • The NSA has lots of oversight

“The right kind of oversight is absolutely necessary,” Chambliss said. “We’ve got oversight now of this program, by the Department of Justice, by NSA, by the FISA court, by the intelligence committees, by the Judiciary Committee. Let me tell you, there is no other program in the intelligence community that has as much oversight as this one.”
The NSA, overseeing the NSA. The FISA court appointed by John Roberts. The Judiciary Committee which held a hearing when it found out about the spying from Edward Snowden. And the secret court that made mass spying legal with no oversight:
However, it's done more than just rubber-stamp whatever it was the government asked for. Through its decisions (which, of course, are secret), it has created a body of common law that gives the NSA and other government agencies powers that exceed anything covered by the laws that should govern their operation.
•  In fact he just met with the NSA last week and they told him they can't spy on people's emails. So there!
“I was back at the NSA just last week,” Chambliss said. “Spent a couple hours out there with high-level and low-level NSA officials, and what I had been assured of is that there is no capability at NSA for anyone without a court order to listen to any telephone conversation or monitor any email. In fact, we don’t monitor emails. That’s what assures me that what the reporting is is not correct. Because no emails are monitored now. There used to be, but that was two, three years ago. So I feel confident that there may have been some abuse, but if there was it was pure accidental.”
Oh, okay then.

For some reason some emails accidentally got spied on but that was years ago and it hasn't happened again, since it is impossible to do so without a court order. And 'if' it did it was 'pure accidental'. So, Sen. Chambliss how did emails accidentally get spied on? Did it fall into that NSA contractor's lap somehow? And if it happened 'accidentally' before, why won't that ever happen again?

Does he really think the American public is stupid enough to believe this nonsense? Or is he stupid enough to believe that this is somehow reassuring? He certainly is displaying a willingness to remain as ignorant as possible of the situation else he might have to do something about it.

I for one, am not reassured.

Originally posted to Heavy Mettle on Mon Jul 29, 2013 at 07:25 AM PDT.

Also republished by Kos Georgia.

Poll

Should Saxby Chambliss take the NSA at their word?

5%1 votes
5%1 votes
11%2 votes
47%8 votes
23%4 votes
5%1 votes

| 17 votes | Vote | Results

EMAIL TO A FRIEND X
Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags

?

More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site