Skip to main content

I'm sure many of you stumbled across this bit of news yesterday:

The Conservative Party has hired Barack Obama's campaign manager Jim Messina for its general election campaign team, BBC Newsnight has learned.

....The Tories are hoping to emulate Mr Obama's re-election against a backdrop of economic problems. Many other governments that have sought re-election during economic turbulence have been punished by voters at the ballot box.
The Conservatives are also thought to hope that Mr Messina will bring to their operation the same binding marriage of social media and political organisation that many in the US credit with securing Mr Obama a second term.

Because nothing says "forwards, not backwards" like the party that is probably the West's most stalwart defender of monarchy.

And nothing says "middle-out economics" slashing welfare programs and embracing a "there is no alternative" approach to austerity, regardless of the damage done to the country's population and economy as a whole.

It is almost as though Messina is nothing but a soulless hack with no core principles except a desire to make more money.  (Although that "almost" might be generous.)

However, it's difficult to feel that surprised.

First of all, there's Messina's "father-and-son-like" relationship with corrupt ConservaDem Max Baucus.

And then there's the ad he designed for Baucus that's considered the "epitome of homophobic demagoguery" in political circles.

Then, there's this gem from the campaign:

Jim Messina, President Barack Obama’s campaign manager, assured a group of Democratic donors from the financial services industry that Obama won’t demonize Wall Street as he stresses populist appeals in his re-election campaign, according to two people at the meeting.
And Messina also recently spoke (for big $$$) at a forum in Azerbaijan, which the Institute for Reporters' Freedom described as a “publicity stunt for an increasingly authoritarian regime.”

So, Messina's record shows signs of crude, bullying social conservatism, fealty to the moneyed interests, and a tacit support for authoritarian policies.  Why, he's a perfect Tory!

Although the Overton window in Europe may be to the left of that in the U.S., one should not view the center-right parties in Europe as the cousins of this country's center-left party. If the Tories could, they would do far more to dismantle Britain's welfare state. They are simply constrained by the strong public support many of such social programs--like the NHS--have. Thatcher, for instance, wanted to dismantle the NHS, but the plan proved too contentious.

Also, even though David Cameron supported the same-sex marriage legislation passed in Parliament earlier this year, the Tories as a party do not, and the bill only passed because of the strength of Labour support.  Almost half of the Tories voted against it.

Oh, and the Tories are also pretty racist in their attitudes toward immigrants.

On the other hand, Labour (the main center-left party in the UK) has typically been to the left of the Democratic Party but to the right of European social democratic parties. Both Labour and the Democratic Party, though, saw their neoliberal reinventions come to full bloom in the 1990s, when Bill Clinton (DLC/New Dems) and Tony Blair (New Labour) reflected the influence of Reaganism/Thatcherism.  

Messina could have worked to help get Labour back in office. Ed Miliband, for instance, could use some help being more charismatic. If Messina wanted to support the austerity-pushing coalition, he could have chosen to work with the Lib Dems, who have seen their electoral support tank after they joined the coalition government (a betrayal of many of their supporters, considering that they had campaigned to the left of Labour).  But, no, he chose the Tories. The Tories may not be a great fit for liberals--or even most Democrats, but they are for Messina.

Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags


More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

  •  I'm recalled of that episode of The West Wing (4+ / 0-)

    when it is discovered that Bruno Gianelli is working for Arnold Vinnick.

    Because of the money.

    "Nothing in all the world is more dangerous than sincere ignorance and conscientious stupidity." --M. L. King "You can't fix stupid" --Ron White -6.00, -5.18

    by zenbassoon on Sat Aug 03, 2013 at 06:55:39 PM PDT

  •  Indeed. (5+ / 0-)
    Messina's record shows signs of crude, bullying social conservatism, fealty to the moneyed interests, and a tacit support for authoritarian policies.  Why, he's a perfect Tory!
    And he was the perfect campaign manager for Barack Obama, and right in keeping with all the other miscreants most valued by our current president. And there are diaries today, with the next election still more than three years off, promoting, in one way or another, the idea that, if the Dems want to win in 2016 they MUST support the Inevitable One, the logical and perfect successor to Barack Obama, the one best suited to continuing and protecting his "legacy."

    Let me the fuck off this ride.

    Refusing to resist = choosing to collaborate. Please give two shits.

    by WisePiper on Sat Aug 03, 2013 at 07:43:21 PM PDT

  •  Is Cameron a Tory? (1+ / 0-)

    There is certainly a view, which exists amongst right wingers in Britain, that Cameron is not a real Tory. Same sex marriage is cited as an example, but the feeling goes back to the early part of the Cameron leadership.

    In opposition, before 2010, Cameron tried to de-toxify the Conservative brand by stunts like "hug a hoody" and going to the Arctic to campaign on climate change. Not much of that has survived into government (and such as has is more due to Liberal Democrat influence than to Cameron).

    The formation of the coalition helped Cameron with his attempt to differentiate himself from traditional Tory values and marginalise his party right wing. Unfortunately instead of the Conservative brand being de-toxified, in practice the Lib Dem one has been poisoned.

    Cameron, in government, has moved more right in some areas of policy than he appeared to believe in opposition. He has not however really appeased the Tory right, who suspect Cameron is not really a true believer.

    It may be that much of the traditional Tory activist base, has gone to join the anti-European Union and immigration United Kingdom Independence Party. This is, in a sense, the segment of British society, equivalent to the Tea Party in the US.

    So far as recruiting Mr Messina for the 2015 campaign, this is probably less significant than Cameron's previous link up with the Australian Liberal (= Conservative) election strategist Lynton Crosby. Crosby is someone who has been described as the Australian Karl Rove.

    It seems likely that the Conservative 2015 election campaign will be one which tries to appeals to the relatively elderly and traditional base, rather than trying very effectively to embrace any new media or other innovation. I suspect Crosby will be more influential in the campaign than Messina.

    There is no man alive who is sufficiently good to rule the life of the man next door to him. Sir Rhys Hopkin Morris, M.P.

    by Gary J on Sun Aug 04, 2013 at 03:40:56 AM PDT

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site