Skip to main content

So this happened today:

South Carolina Gov. Nikki Haley (R) will seek reelection in 2014, her spokesman said Monday.

Haley will make her bid official at a previously planned Aug. 26 rally in Greenville that will include Sen. Tim Scott (R) and Govs. Scott Walker (R-Wis.), Bobby Jindal (R-La.) and Rick Perry (R-Texas).

Spokesman Rob Godfrey, in a statement, cited the big response to the rally.

“And once we did that, Governor Haley decided that we might as well make it official – she’s running for reelection,” Godfrey said. - Washington Post, 8/12/13

Haley's decision to run for re-election really isn't that much of a surprise:

Haley has been raising money for a re-election campaign, but so far has not officially announced plans to seek a second term.

The governor’s race next year is expected to be a rematch with Democratic state Sen. Vincent Sheheen of Camden, who lost to Haley by less than 5 percent in 2010.

Another potential Republican presidential candidate, U.S. Sen. Rand Paul of Kentucky, is scheduled to be in Anderson on Aug. 26 for U.S. Rep. Jeff Duncan’s annual Faith and Freedom barbecue and fundraiser. - Greenville Online, 8/12/13

Given Haley's unpopularity and difficult time winning her first race, you would think she would step aside and let a stronger Republican candidate run against Sheheen.  But of course she isn't going to do that and she's rallying up her other awful GOP colleagues to help jump start her 2014 re-election bid.  While Haley's been getting ready for re-election, Sheheen's been not only been out campaigning and telling voters about his vision for a better South Carolina, he's also been acting more like a real Governor than Haley:

State Sen. Vincent Sheheen attempted to one-up Haley last week, sending her a letter detailing his visits to the families affected by the Greenwood County tuberculosis outbreak and asking her to create a “TB Crisis Controller,” or a single point of contact for the families.

When Haley’s camp dismissed the Camden Democrat’s request, calling him a “political ambulance chaser,” Sheheen’s camp fired back. “Governor Haley has now officially said more about politics and the TB outbreak than she has said about families affected by the scandal – certainly much more than she has ever said to the parents directly,” said Kristin Sosanie, S.C. Democratic Party spokesperson.

In response, Haley’s former spokesman Rob Godfrey – now a campaign adviser – criticized Sheheen for “ambulance chasing for victims whenever a problem arises in the state. If he could figure out a way to do it, he’d blame Nikki Haley for the weather being bad.” - The State, 8/10/13

Sheheen has shown that he not only genuinely cares but wants action to be done about the tuberculosis outbreak in South Carolina.  He even wrote Haley telling her to get off her ass actually take initiative like a Governor is suppose to do:
Governor Haley,                        

Yesterday, I met with families and children exposed to tuberculosis as a result of the outbreak in Greenwood County. It was made clear to me that the parents are extremely dissatisfied with the timing of notification to them and with the response thus far. I write today to share their stories and advocate on their behalf for a single point of contact stationed in Greenwood County empowered by your office – a TB Crisis Controller -- responsible for getting the consistent answers and treatment these families need and deserve.

As a father of three boys in public school, speaking with these families was deeply emotional. To hear what these children and families are struggling with medically as a result of the TB exposure was compelling, but also to hear of the confusing and bureaucratic way they have been treated by state government in the aftermath of this public disaster was appalling.

The lives of these children and parents have been turned on their head, and not just medically.

One poor little girl suffers because of a reaction to the TB medication that not only makes her sicker but extends the length of her treatment. Two of the mothers shared stories of broken play dates and isolation for their kids because other families do not want their kids to be around a child who has been exposed. Another mother mentioned how her daughter could no longer go to her grandparents’ house or participate in a family vacation because of the fear of exposure and the need for constant medication.

What made me angry was hearing about state government’s continued failures to these families. One parent talked to me about repeatedly showing up for medical visits only to be told that she would have to wait hours because a nurse was not available. Another mother told of being in the waiting room at a DHEC clinic and having the staff call out her son’s name across the room and say that his TB medication was ready. For a small community and a major public scandal, this exposure of her son caused her concern through no fault of his own.

The stories each of them told were the same: Repeated calls to DHEC that are not timely returned. Two-hour wait times on appointments for children. No consistent point of contact for questions about medication, or how to proceed with the treatment of their children. Families had to get a court order to force DHEC clinics to open up on the weekend so those infected could receive appropriate care. Push back from DHEC staff on testing family members and certain segments of the school population. And above all, confusion about what is now going on and why their children were allowed to be exposed.

The list goes on and on. We can do better. They deserve better.  What appears to be missing is a single point of authority within Greenwood County for the families to get consistent answers and to manage this crisis in a consistent manner.

That’s why I propose the immediate designation of a TB Crisis Controller to serve as the single point of contact for families dealing with exposure to tuberculosis. This position can be an existing staff position, or a new creation, but it’s long past time that these families have someone to meet with to help them navigate through the government dysfunction.

The government clearly failed our citizens in Greenwood in this matter, and it’s long past time that the State step up and stop making it even more difficult for them. Now is the time for leadership.

Thank you for your consideration of this matter.

Sincerely, Vincent Sheheen

CC: Senator Floyd Nicholson
Senate Medical Affairs Committee Chairman Harvey Peeler

But Sheheen's early entrance into the epic rematch has voters noticing that only when Sheheen announced his candidacy and started to campaign did Haley really start to focus on some serious issues like education funding:

Gov. Nikki Haley’s focus on reforming the way South Carolina funds its public schools should at a minimum spawn a vital discussion about the state’s future.

South Carolina’s education funding system has been a mess for years. Schools get money from so many different sources that it’s hard for anyone to keep track. Attempts to fix the problem on a piecemeal basis have only added to the confusion.

What we do know is that students in poorer areas have access to far fewer learning opportunities than those in other parts of the state. Poorer schools offer fewer courses and use less sophisticated technology. In more affluent areas, however, students choose from a wide array of college prep or technology options. They also have access to the latest computers or tablets.

It’s also shameful that we allow students in Dillon and Marion counties to learn in ancient, dilapidated buildings while high school athletes in Spartanburg and York counties play on the most advanced athletic turf in state-of-the art stadiums.

First, we wonder why she waited until her third year in office to focus on education reform. Did her interest grow because her likely Democrat opponent next year, state Sen. Vincent Sheheen of Camden, has made expanding 4-year-old kindergarten a major campaign issue? - Herald Online, 8/9/13

Let me give you all a taste of what Sheheen's been up to on the campaign trail and why I think he is going to succeed this time around:

If Sen. Vincent Sheheen is to make up the 60,000 votes by which he lost the governor’s race to Nikki Haley in 2010, he will have to expand his voter base.

Among the voters he will have to lure away from Haley are small business owners, who are often predisposed to voting against Democrats due to perceptions about tax policy.

On Monday, Sheheen spoke to a room full of such people at the Columbia Rotary. After an opening joke about the chaos that is South Carolina’s political scene, Sheheen went deep into criticisms of the Haley administration and then described what he would do to prevent the state from being near the bottom of the things that matter, like employment and education.

Sheheen blasted Haley for her handling of the Department on Revenue data security breach and for DHEC’s handling of the tuberculosis outbreak. “Right now, we have an administration that operates in secret. Their first instinct is to keep things from the public,” Sheheen said.

In a session with the media afterwards, Sheheen expanded on the point, ”Some people tend to be opaque and secretive, some administrations tend to be opaque and secretive. Why? I don’t know,” he said. “We’ve seen that (from Gov. Haley) since before she was governor.”

Sheheen stressed the importance of education to a growing economy and noted that the high-cost of public colleges is driving young people out of state, a talent exodus that makes the Palmetto State less attractive to employers. He noted that North Carolina government funds 50 percent of university budgets while South Carolina funds just 12 percent. - Columbia Patch, 7/22/13

Sheheen's making the right call making small business owners a top demographic to win over and could be the key to his re-election success:

Sheheen is laying the foundation for his 2014 run this summer. This month, he spoke about health care to a senior center in Conway and visited with voters in Aiken, Greenwood and Anderson. He recently spoke about education at schools in Georgetown, Greenville and Beaufort.

Sheheen's argument to voters is they should be tired of South Carolina being a running joke to the rest of the nation. His speech included slides and maps with statistics that he says shows South Carolina college graduates are more likely to leave the state than their counterparts across the Southeast. He also said it is harder to move up economically in South Carolina than most of the country.

"Business people understand if we are going to move forward, we can't have a government that is a disaster, that is dysfunctional, that works in secret," Sheheen said.

If Haley and Sheheen face each other in 2014, each will try to court small business owners like the ones at Monday's meeting. Haley has touted the reduction in unemployment under her administration and continually promises business owners she will reduce the amount of regulation and cut their taxes. - Trib Town, 7/22/13

Sheheen has also been making Haley's handling of the TB outbreak a big campaign issue:
DHEC is not a cabinet agency, but Sheheen said Haley is responsible for it because she appointed its director, Catherine Templeton, and the agency's board. He pointed out Haley was also slow to put responsibility for the stolen data from the Department of Revenue on its director, who eventually stepped down.

"Agency heads that have major dysfunctions in their offices, they should be fired, not coddled," Sheheen said. - Trib Town, 7/22/13

Sheheen's also been painting Haley's administration as one that lacks serious transparency:

Sheheen gave a strongly worded speech to the Columbia, S.C. Rotary Club this week – blistering Haley on a wide range of issues.

“Right now, we have an administration that operates in secret,” Sheheen said. “Their first instinct is to keep things from the public. People’s tax information was stolen, and the governor kept it secret for two weeks before telling the public. There’s a secret report in the governor’s office detailing what happened with the hacking, but the public can’t read it. We’ve seen the destruction of emails, the purposeful use of non-government email accounts and cell phones so the public can’t know what’s going on. And of course, DHEC kept information about a TB outbreak in Greenwood secret for months, and now dozens of children have tested positive for TB. That’s just wrong.”

That’s also just the tip of the iceberg when it comes to Haley’s incompetence … and hypocrisy. - FITS News, 7/22/13

Sheheen's approach is to get the voters to ask themselves, "is Nikki Haley corrupt or incompetent?"

Sheheen’s comments, plus his maneuvering during the latest legislative session, make his strategy clear: The Camden Democrat is placing all of his chips on running against Haley’s record as governor.

“A fundamental part of this governor’s race has to be about accountability and responsibility,” Sheheen told The State newspaper. “What we haven’t seen for a decade — and certainly not in the last three years — is accountability for the failures of state government.”

In Conway, and elsewhere across the state in his public appearances, Sheheen has hit the governor hard on the cyber-security breach at the Department of Revenue, where hackers stole the personal information of 6.4 million consumers. - The State, 7/23/13

Now Sheheen's campaigning hasn't been all about attacking Haley.  As Governor, Sheheen wants to create a green South Carolina:

Sheheen, a Camden Democrat who plans to run for governor next year, said South Carolina could produce thousands of jobs by embracing new forms of energy and allowing the alternative power industry to expand.

But South Carolina has no comprehensive plan for energy conservation and efficiency, nor is it doing enough to encourage clean energy expansion, Sheheen told several hundred people at a conference in Columbia.

“Right now, there is a vacuum of leadership in those areas,” Sheheen said. He did not mention Republican Gov. Nikki Haley in his speech, but said later that leadership on energy policy starts in the governor’s office.

“We certainly haven’t seen any big ideas on clean energy and how to keep our dollars and our jobs in South Carolina,” he told reporters.

Sheheen, an opponent of drilling for oil off South Carolina beaches, made his remarks as interest in renewable power grows in a state that historically has shunned sun, wind and biomass in favor of coal and nuclear.

South Carolina is among the least friendly states in the country for solar power, even though it has plenty of sunshine, according to national renewable energy scorecards. That has kept homeowners from being able to afford the high upfront prices of sun panels that otherwise could cut their power bills.

Renewable power takes less of a toll on the environment because certain forms, such as solar and wind, do not release toxic pollutants, greenhouse gases or create nuclear waste. But renewable energy’s biggest appeal, say its advocates, is lower monthly power bills for the average customer – particularly since South Carolina is a poor state with some of the highest average electricity rates in the South.

The state also has “one of the most energy inefficient housing stocks in America,” Sheheen said, noting that many low-income residents can’t afford to pay for energy efficiency improvements on their homes.

He recounted the story of a man in rural South Carolina who he learned is paying more than $400 per month for electricity, even though the man lives in a small trailer. That’s about the amount Sheheen, a lawyer, said he pays monthly to heat and light his 3,000-square-foot house in Kershaw County.

If the mobile home could be made more energy efficient, those power bills might go down, Sheheen said at the S.C. Clean Energy Summit, which attracted several hundred renewable energy entrepreneurs, utility executives and others. - The State, 7/11/13

Sheheen been laying out the attacks and details for a little while now and he hasn't been holding back.  He's been charming and tough and has been expressing a real vision for South Carolina's future.  This is a guy who really wants to be Governor and has had enough of what Haley's been doing to his state.  His passion and vision are helping him fuel an enthusiastic campaign.  Now of course, The South Carolina GOP thinks it has an issue that can sink Sheheen's campaign; Obamacare:

This week, the S.C. Republican Party (SCGOP) launched the first of what we suspect will be many salvos from many directions over Sheheen’s boneheaded decision. Seizing on a report from the S.C. Department of Insurance (SCDOI) showing rising health care premiums in the Palmetto State associated with Obamacare’s implementation, the SCGOP issued a press release decrying the “Obama-Sheheen health care disaster” and the “Obama-Sheheen health care takeover.”

“Vince Sheheen has spent four years supporting Obamacare, and now the people of South Carolina are stuck paying for it – to the tune of an insurance hike of up to 70 percent,” SCGOP chairman Matt Moore said in his party’s release.

Ah, “Obama-Sheheen.” The once and future Democratic gubernatorial nominee should probably get used to hearing that line again, and again and again (and again). - FITS News, 8/5/13

Here's a little background info:

South Carolina should accept an estimated $2 billion in money under the federal health care act to expand Medicaid to hundreds of thousands of additional working poor in the state, State Sen. Vincent Sheheen said Thursday.

"I call on Gov. (Nikki) Haley and every Democrat and every Republican to heed the example of other states and provide leadership that will mean more tax dollars in South Carolina that belong to South Carolinians," the Camden Democrat said.

Sheheen, who held his news conference on the horseshoe of the Medical University of South Carolina, is mentioned as a candidate for governor in a rematch next year against Haley, who defeated him in 2010.

Sheheen has said he has been weighing what effect the Medicaid expansion might have. He said the state should go ahead and accept the federal money for the first three years. Then, he said, the state should review whether it makes financial sense to continue.

Under the health care act, Washington pays for the first three years of the Medicaid expansion. After that, the state picks up 10 percent of the cost. - Independent Mail, 3/7/13

Here's why some pundits think Sheheen made the wrong call in taking his party's stance on the Medicaid expansion:
S.C. Senator Vincent Sheheen (D-Camden) made a critical tactical error earlier this year in endorsing the Medicaid expansion associated with Barack Obama’s socialized medicine plan. In fact Sheheen’s fateful decision could cost him his chance to defeat S.C. Gov. Nikki Haley in next year’s rematch of their 2010 gubernatorial race.

Allow us to explain: Given the extent to which Haley – a “Republican” – has been ballooning the state’s Medicaid rolls since taking office, Sheheen had a golden opportunity to get to the “right” of the governor on a critical spending issue. And he could have done so while telling his Democratic base he was still committed to “responsible Medicaid expansion.” - FITS News, 8/5/13

Ok, I can see how you would think that would be a valid argument.  Be in favor of the idea but against the execution.  FITS News thinks Sheheen should've gone to the right of his party on Medicaid expansion like in Arkansas but Arkansas' model of the Medicaid expansion won't work for South Carolina:

“If Republicans are for this plan, I don’t know what exactly they were against before,” says Tony Keck, who runs South Carolina’s Medicaid program. “It covers the same number of people, with the same benefits and is more expensive. I have a hard time understanding what it is that some of these Republican legislators like about that.”

As South Carolina’s Medicaid director, Keck has long opposed the Affordable Care Act’s Medicaid expansion. He wrote a piece for Wonkblog about this right after the Supreme Court decision, in which he argued that accepting the additional federal dollars was unlikely to improve the health of South Carolinians.

Keck is a bit of a countervailing voice in the Republican party right now. Staunch opponents of the law, including  Maine Gov. Paul LePage, have shown some interest in the Arkansas option. They like the idea of moving low-income people out of the public insurance program and into the individual marketplace, where they would shop for private plans like other, subsidized state residents.

Keck argues that there’s no reason to favor this version of the expansion, if you oppose the concept of the Medicaid expansion. In an interview Monday, I had him explain why.

To start, Keck goes back to his philosophical argument about the Medicaid expansion. If the current health insurance system doesn’t help people get healthier, why should we expect a bigger version of the program to do better?

“We’re opposed to spending way too much money, in general, on a health-care system where we get way too little in return,” Keck says. “I’d rather focus on getting more value for our dollars, and improving the system, rather than just making the system bigger.”

Let’s say, though, that a Republican governor does disagree with Keck. He thinks there is value in bringing more Medicaid dollars into the state, even if it means some additional state spending on the program. In that situation, Keck argues that buying private insurance is one of the worst ways to use those extra funds.

“It’s Medicaid but more expensive and complicated,” Keck says. “There’s no other way to look at it.” - Washington Post, 4/3/13

Plus expanding Medicaid in general is popular, especially in the deep South:

Over 60 percent of the Americans living in the Deep South support Obamacare’s Medicaid expansion, according to the results from a new poll that surveyed a broad sample of people in Alabama, Georgia, Louisiana, Mississippi, and South Carolina.

The poll, conducted between March and April by the Joint Center for Political and Economic Studies, found that support for Medicaid expansion is somewhat divided along partisan lines. Nevertheless, a solid majority of residents in each of the five Deep South states favor expanding the public insurance program to extend coverage to additional uninsured Americans:

That public support stands in sharp contrast to the five states’ political leaders, who have resisted cooperating with health care reform at any cost. The GOP governors in each of those Southern states — Govs. Robert Bentley (R-AL), Nathan Deal (R-GA), Bobby Jindal (R-LA), Phil Bryant (R-MS), and Nikki Haley (R-SC) — have refused to expand their Medicaid programs.

“This survey clearly shows that governors and state legislators in the South who are resisting the Medicaid expansion are out-of-step with their constituents,” Brian D. Smedley, the director of the Joint Center’s Health Policy Institute, pointed out. - Think Progress, 5/22/13

And the temporary Medicaid expansion in South Carolina is already taking place:

The South Carolina Department of Health and Human Services (SCDHHS) has approved BlueChoice® HealthPlan Medicaid's request to expand its Medicaid managed care coverage area to include Horry County.

Starting Aug. 15, Medicaid-eligible residents of Horry County may select BlueChoice® Medicaid as their coverage option for traditional Medicaid services and the many additional benefits offered by BlueChoice.

Enrollees will have access to BlueChoice Medicaid's extensive provider network, which in Horry County includes 95 primary care and 268 specialty care providers as well as four area hospitals — Conway Medical Center, Grand Strand Regional Medical Center, McLeod Loris Hospital and McLeod Seacoast Hospital.

"BlueChoice Medicaid has worked hard to develop a network of quality health care providers in Horry County. We look forward to serving eligible Horry County residents who want better coordination of care, as well as extras such as a 24-hour nurse line and wellness programs," said Scott Graves, president and COO of BlueChoice HealthPlan.

SCDHHS administers the state's Medicaid managed care program. Residents who establish Medicaid eligibility with the agency may elect to receive their benefits through a managed care plan offered by a private sector company such as BlueChoice. - WBTW News 13, 8/5/13

Of course Republicans are going to spend big to lie about Sheheen and scare people out of supporting the idea of fully expanding Medicaid to take the focus off of Haley's awful record as Governor.  But Sheheen isn't going to let her dupe voters and neither should we.  There's nothing sweeter than beating a Republican on their home turf and we just happen to have an excellent candidate in Vincent Sheheen.  If you would like to donate or get involved with Sheheen's campaign, you can do so here:

Originally posted to pdc on Mon Aug 12, 2013 at 08:32 PM PDT.

Also republished by Knowledge Democrats, Youth Kos 2.0, Climate Hawks, and The Democratic Wing of the Democratic Party.

Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags


More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

  •  Great diary! Thanks for covering this (17+ / 0-)

    I have, personally, guaranteed 10 votes so far for Vince.  Doesn't sound like a lot, but that is just me and 4 friends.  We're plugging along, one by one, person by person to get some Democrats to the polls, with their proper fucking ID, and a vote in the sane column :-)

    This is working too:

    Sheheen's argument to voters is they should be tired of South Carolina being a running joke to the rest of the nation.
    As quirky as politics is down here (quirky = corrupt as all hell), people are getting sick of it.  Haley's education missteps are going to hurt her badly.

    Listening to the NRA on school safety is like listening to the tobacco companies on cigarette safety. (h/t nightsweat)

    by PsychoSavannah on Mon Aug 12, 2013 at 08:47:03 PM PDT

  •  a TB outbreak in the US? (10+ / 0-)

    and the governor of the state is not all over it? shame.

  •  My guess is corrupt ... (6+ / 0-)

    ... and incompetent! This is a race I will be working hard on on a local level. Thanks for the diary, pdc, and very well done!

    I would tip you, but the man took away my tips.

    by Tortmaster on Mon Aug 12, 2013 at 09:24:23 PM PDT

  •  I don't exactly know about the weather in SC (1+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:

    but certainly Republicans own the climate.

    The only good thing I know about that is that we are at the tipping point, and soon it won't matter what the deniers say. The markets are starting to speak. Goldman Sachs is telling anybody who will listen not to invest in coal for energy or export.

    I must finish that diary. But the news is coming so fast, I haven't been able to keep up.

    Ceterem censeo, gerrymandra delenda est

    by Mokurai on Mon Aug 12, 2013 at 10:20:32 PM PDT

  •  I think the expansion will eventually happen in (6+ / 0-)

    ...every state. People, even those claiming to be conservative, do not like it when other folks enjoy benefits they could also be enjoying. At some point, citizens will understand that the lack of Medicaid expansion will continue to be a burden passed on to local taxpayers through higher taxes/fees.

    I think South Carolina will be far more competitive once the Democrats decide to get back to developing good candidates who run great campaigns. That is a rebuilding effort that needs to take place across the South. There is no demographic reason why a state like South Carolina, or Mississippi cannot be more competitive.

    The politicians may be bought, and the system corrupt, but it is our duty to fix these things.

    by sebastianguy99 on Mon Aug 12, 2013 at 10:52:53 PM PDT

  •  While it is true that it is annoying to states (1+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:

    to have dollars come from Washington with strings attached, the fact of the matter is that Washington is the source, the only source, of dollars.  Moreover, dollars that arrive in the form of social programs deliver real goods and services immediately, instead of being first washed through the bank accounts of banksters and financiers and CEOs before trickling down to fund a few jobs. Dollars need to be infused into the economy. Spending them on social services for a large number of people is a more direct infusion and circumvents the large and growing horde of middlemen, each looking for a cut of each dollar spent.

    It is a mistake to categorize dollars in terms of whose pockets they came from last. All U.S. dollars are belong to us, in a more real sense than the script we use belongs to us. Both scrip and script are figments of the imagination, but, while the U.S. dollar is exclusively ours, the alphabet we use to memorialize ideas in visual form is being shared by a large portion of the civilized world. It is even being taught in Chinese schools where all the children learn English, as well. We don't speak of the French alphabet or the Nigerian alphabet because all the same letters are used. The Cyrilic and Arabic scripts are different, just as the euro and the yen and the pound are different.

    However, the recent adoption be seventeen countries of the euro as a common currency is revealing. Those countries have voluntarily submitted themselves to something we had to have a Civil War to settle. While not much attention has been paid, one of the first acts of the Confederacy was to issue its own currency and when other countries failed to honor it, it was not a happenstance, but rather part of the northern strategy to win the conflict. What is also forgotten is that prior to the Civil War some states issued their own currency. California issuing IOUs a couple of years ago was not such a novelty. After all, every U.S. dollar is nothing more than a certified IOU. The debts that are promised to be paid are, like marital obligations, assumed separately. That is, we all enter into personal and public contracts, which we promise to complete, regardless of whether they are formally recognized by the public. Recognition, whether in the form of a marriage certificate or cash, merely increases the likelihood that the obligations will be met.
    Of course, the Cons, being people who resent and reject the very concept of obligation, look upon debt as akin to extinction. I suppose in a dog eat dog world, obligation is a lesser evil. That sharing and caring are human norms simply doesn't register.

    We organize governments to deliver services and prevent abuse.

    by hannah on Tue Aug 13, 2013 at 02:24:39 AM PDT

  •  It doesn't matter who the candidates are in SC (0+ / 0-)

    75% of whites will vote for any Republican and 97% of African Americans will vote for any Democrat.  This is, of course, just an empirical observation rather than any kind of moral equivalency: the first group is motivated by racism, the second is motivated by rational self-interest led by not wanting to be subject to racism.  The bottom line is that the math isn't quite there for a statewide Democratic victory in South Carolina, and it won't be until there's a frontal assault on racism that makes enough Republican voters re-evaluate their commitment to racial (racist) voting.

    You know, I sometimes think if I could see, I'd be kicking a lot of ass. -Stevie Wonder at the Glastonbury Festival, 2010

    by Rich in PA on Tue Aug 13, 2013 at 03:47:11 AM PDT

    •  The math was there in 2010 (4+ / 0-)

      Haley only won by 4% in 2010. Russ Feingold lost in Wisconsin by more than Sheheen did in SC. Haley can be beaten.

    •  TURNOUT. (Motivation.) (0+ / 0-)

      On the national level--what was the difference between 2008 and 2010? TURNOUT.

      In 2008, the Dems were fired up and the GOP was demoralized. Dems had high turnout, GOP had low. In 2010 those shoes were on the other feet.

      South Carolina next year: yes, sure, Haley will get 75% of the white vote and Sheheen will get 97% of the black vote. But the big question is what % of GOP & Dem voters will decide to stay home.

      "The true strength of our nation comes not from the might of our arms or the scale of our wealth, but from the enduring power of our ideals." - Barack Obama

      by HeyMikey on Tue Aug 13, 2013 at 09:30:58 AM PDT

      [ Parent ]

  •  Her mentor Mark Sanford is why (1+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:

    If HE can win his way back into power, Haley figures she stands a good chance if she can score the right support.

    By that I mean the deep pockets.

    And given South Carolina's status as one of modern day Republicanism's holy sites, the money will pour in.

  •  The college funding data is interesting. (1+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:

    I always wondered why NC kicked SC's ass in economic development.

  •  Thanks for the article (1+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:

    The TB thing has definitely knocked Nikki down a peg or too. It goes back to the corporate anti-labor lawyer who heads DHEC, Catherine Templeton. She's a conservative who laid waste to the state labor and licensing division, and is destroying the state's heath and environmental watchdog.

  •  excellent diary thank you (0+ / 0-)

    Haley needs to be exposed for what she is, an incompetent wanna be, a la GWB. These are people who want power for power's sake, and just want to cripple the middle class and pony up to the rich elite one percenters (makers)

  •  Great post. Very informative and filled (0+ / 0-)

    with good reasons for optimism. I really think the ACA may be one of the keys.

    Further, affiant sayeth not. 53959

    by Gary Norton on Tue Aug 13, 2013 at 08:34:29 AM PDT

  •  Sheheen is great (0+ / 0-)

    He really seems like a strong progressive, especially for his state.

    Leftist Mormon in Utah, Born in Washington State, live in UT-04 (Matheson).

    by Gygaxian on Tue Aug 13, 2013 at 10:01:23 AM PDT

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site