Skip to main content

Senators Ron Wyden, Dianne Feinstein, and Pat Roberts in an Intelligence Committee meeting.
Still a true believer, Dianne?
Is this really what's keeping us safe from terror attacks?
The National Security Agency has broken privacy rules or overstepped its legal authority thousands of times each year since Congress granted the agency broad new powers in 2008, according to an internal audit and other top-secret documents.

Most of the infractions involve unauthorized surveillance of Americans or foreign intelligence targets in the United States, both of which are restricted by statute and executive order. They range from significant violations of law to typographical errors that resulted in unintended interception of U.S. e-mails and telephone calls.

The documents, provided earlier this summer to The Washington Post by former NSA contractor Edward Snowden, include a level of detail and analysis that is not routinely shared with Congress or the special court that oversees surveillance. In one of the documents, agency personnel are instructed to remove details and substitute more generic language in reports to the Justice Department and the Office of the Director of National Intelligence.[emphasis added]

There's a great deal to unpack in this, probably the loudest and most significant whistle blown by Edward Snowden. The May 2012 audit counted 2,776 incidents of "unauthorized collection, storage, access to or distribution of legally protected communications" in the previous year. But those 2,776 "incidents" don't mean 2,776 individual violations, but 2,776 times the NSA violated privacy rules, with an unknown number of individual violations within each infraction. That audit is only for the NSA's Fort Meade and Washington, D.C. area facilities. Three government officials who spoke with Post reporter Barton Gellman "said the number would be substantially higher if it included other NSA operating units and regional collection centers."
In one instance, the NSA decided that it need not report the unintended surveillance of Americans. A notable example in 2008 was the interception of a “large number” of calls placed from Washington when a programming error confused the U.S. area code 202 for 20, the international dialing code for Egypt, according to a “quality assurance” review that was not distributed to the NSA’s oversight staff.

In another case, the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court, which has authority over some NSA operations, did not learn about a new collection method until it had been in operation for many months. The court ruled it unconstitutional.

The NSA apparently unilaterally decides whether or not it needs to report its violations to its own oversight staff, to the FISA court, to the Justice Department, and to Congress. And it apparently frequently decides it just doesn't need to. Even after the court (the head judge of which admits it has limited ability to do anything about it) has ruled what it's doing is unconstitutional.

The documents say that one in 10 incidents happens because of a typographical error when an analyst messes up a query. "But the more serious lapses include unauthorized access to intercepted communications, the distribution of protected content and the use of automated systems without built-in safeguards to prevent unlawful surveillance." Once that information is intercepted—whether intentionally or not—it can be added to the NSA's databases, and "absent other restrictions, the communications of Americans may be searched freely." This incidental collection, according to NSA official guidelines, isn't considered a violation and doesn't have to be reported internally or included in quarterly reports to Congress.

Sen. Dianne Feinstein, chair of the Senate Intelligence Committee, did not receive a copy of this audit until the Post advised her that it existed. Her reaction is underwhelming, saying the committee “can and should do more to independently verify that NSA’s operations are appropriate, and its reports of compliance incidents are accurate.” You think? On the other hand, Senate Judiciary Committee Chair Patrick Leahy is sounding a bit more alarmed, and promises more hearings.

We need a lot more hearings. We need a reconstituted Church Commission that meets, in public and in front of television cameras, and determines just what else our government is doing to us in our names. We don't need "independent" review boards hand-picked by the Director of National Intelligence James Clapper, who not only admittedly lied to Congress but who has also apparently been kept out of the loop on some of the NSA violations. It's time for some transparency, some accountability.

Let's start here. Sign our petition urging Congress to declassify the FISA court’s rulings.

There's ongoing discussion of these revelations in Little's and David Harris Gershon's diaries.

Originally posted to Joan McCarter on Fri Aug 16, 2013 at 08:41 AM PDT.

Also republished by The Rebel Alliance and Daily Kos.

Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags


More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site