Skip to main content

The Sunday shows this week were devoted in large part to two things. First, whether or not America will be getting our war on, which is the very excited subject of most of the shows most of the weeks, and second, remembering the 50th anniversary of the march on Washington, a dramatic moment in the civil rights movement and one that, at the 50 year mark, still eagerly awaits its final whitewashing into a carefully branded, feel-good Pepsi Zero version of itself, something generic and nonthreatening, something that even bitter old cranks who have spent the last five decades steadfastly missing the point can rally behind and pretend to respect before getting on with the more important business of deciding what new paperwork certain people might have to show today in order to vote, or explaining why laborers demanding fair wages or pensions these days are tired artifacts of discredited times, or why The Poors need to learn their place because in the world of today they ought to just be grateful for whatever scraps we deign to give them.

Fifty years is an uncomfortable milestone for things in general; it is long enough ago that few people still living will have been adult witnesses to the thing, but not quite so long as to have erased all witnesses. Fifty years is, say, long enough ago that even Supreme Court Justices can applaud the spirit of the movement, and long enough for those same Supreme Court Justices to declare that the problems of 50 years ago have now been solved, huzzah, but it is not long enough that they do not find themselves saying so in the presence of a man who was there at the time, and who disagrees. And all of this is a longwinded way for me to dodge talking about George Effing Will for a moment—but damn it, nope, he's still there. Ah, crap.

More on George Will below the fold.

Yes, George Will was one of the roundtable voices called upon to give his opinion on the March on Washington, apparently because the networks have these people permanently chained to their chairs. George Will will likely still be appearing on the Sunday Shows 10 years after his death. It may already be 10 years after his death—nothing George Will has said in the last decade has been anything more than a much-devolved regurgitation of things he once was able to say less stupidly, so we may be able to chalk up all his more recent efforts as the burblings of escaping gas. Here the panel is having a nice discussion on what the 50th anniversary means and what was really meant then and how things are now, and finally the camera reluctantly turns to the sharply dressed corpse of George Effing Will and he burbles forth with the opinion that civil rights really has never been the issue.

Will, however, pointed to a report published by Daniel Patrick Moynihan eight months after the march that said there was crisis in the African-American community "because 24 percent of African-American children are being born to unmarried women."

"Today, it's tripled, 72 percent," Will added. "And that, not an absence of rights is surely the biggest impediment."

The impressive thing about this is that George Will has either been holding a rather shudderingly archaic-sounding 1965 report called The Negro Family: The Case for National Action in his head for 49 years and four months, able to rattle off particular statistics cited within it, or more likely that he or the infestation of insect-like hard-right conservative interns now tasked with operating his hands and mouth decided that what would put the 50th Anniversary of the March on Washington in its place would be, of all possible things, that. It was never about the voting rights, or the racism, or the violence, or the excruciating narrowness of available jobs, or the ghettoization, or the poverty that resulted from all the rest of it; no, it is cultural weakness on the part of black Americans to blame. The 1965 report blamed it on the "tangle of pathology" resulting from "the matriarchal pattern of so many Negro families"; the burbles of George Will helpfully reduce it further to being unmarried.

So it's not an absence of rights that is surely the biggest impediment, George Will says with all apparent seriousness, in apparent counterpoint to all these people who have been mentioning ongoing racism and criminal injustices and new voter suppression efforts and levels of unemployment and poverty that have been all but proclaimed as the new normal, the to-be-cherished new upper bound of non-success for the poor and the middle class alike, but unmarried women. Unmarried women have been the problem all along. If we marry off the women, it only stands to reason, all the rest of this will be solved.

I have a new theory. My new theory is that the Sunday shows exist not to inform us or debate things or, God help us, hear from anyone who might be an actual expert on anything at all. They simply exist to remind the nation, or at least any poor saps in the nation who still watch these things, that punditry is a static enterprise. Entirely. No matter what happens in the world, no matter which wars need fighting, no matter whether the economy turns good or turns bad, no matter whether any government program works or does not, no matter what new evidence of what comes over the transom or what gets exposed as hokum, you will still hear the exact same notions expressed in the exact same ways by the exact same people, ad nauseam, ad infinitum, ad undas, to the extent that even the footnotes of the arguments may be 49 years and 4 months old. Fashion changes, but the types of people propped up to object to Martin Luther King Jr. and his pesky opinions on things have not changed in the slightest.

Originally posted to Hunter on Mon Aug 26, 2013 at 01:28 PM PDT.

Also republished by RaceGender DiscrimiNATION, Black Kos community, and Daily Kos.

EMAIL TO A FRIEND X
Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags

?

More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

Chi, grollen, Pandora, tiponeill, livosh1, annalivia, richardak, elfling, concernedamerican, farmerhunt, poe, CoConut, edrie, psnyder, TexDem, NYC Sophia, Eyesbright, scott5js, johanus, DSC on the Plateau, rlharry, Diana in NoVa, Major Kong, Curt Matlock, kfred, Emmy, Ohkwai, vcmvo2, maybeeso in michigan, historys mysteries, radarlady, Progressive Witness, JohnB47, dewtx, stagemom, eru, owlbear1, cspivey, Tunk, Shotput8, FindingMyVoice, peacestpete, xaxnar, begone, LeftOverAmerica, Kingsmeg, Themistoclea, tonyahky, Arabiflora, arlene, Wednesday Bizzare, blueoasis, MJ via Chicago, JVolvo, unclebucky, onionjim, Dyana, CA Nana, Clive all hat no horse Rodeo, blueoregon, dochackenbush, SeekCa, Little, john07801, Habitat Vic, oklacoma dem, camlbacker, devis1, EdSF, Stwriley, yoduuuh do or do not, karmsy, flumptytail, newpioneer, millwood, leonard145b, TomP, gizmo59, seriously70, left turn, GAS, OleHippieChick, Thomas Twinnings, Involuntary Exile, dadadata, Buckeye Nut Schell, dewley notid, Jeff Y, SottoVoce, glendaw271, luckylizard, Karl Rover, legendmn, ewmorr, Nebraskablue, ebrann, stevenwag, Dragon5616, collardgreens, Its the Supreme Court Stupid, FogCityJohn, luvsathoroughbred, kacemo, Kristina40, AJ in Camden, addisnana, ericlewis0, cocinero, slice, TheHalfrican, theKgirls, annieli, the autonomist, implicate order, vahana, UtahLibrul, FarWestGirl, NormAl1792, Carolyn in Oregon, badscience, smoothnmellow, enhydra lutris, zapus, VTCC73, cactusgal, blue aardvark, ratcityreprobate, weinerschnauzer, Monsieur Georges, jacey, GenXangster, sow hat, IndieGuy, S F Hippie, a2nite, peachcreek, belinda ridgewood, MartyM, doroma, FrY10cK, Sue B, Lily O Lady, Chaddiwicker, argomd, poopdogcomedy, kafktastic, alice kleeman, GrannyRedBird, Ishmaelbychoice, Kimbeaux, Kombema, DarthMeow504, Batya the Toon, htowngenie, richardvjohnson, Chas 981, anana

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site