Skip to main content

Would you support a constitutional amendment to substitute a five-person executive council for the current single-person US presidency?

I argue that such a change would make the executive branch more democratic because five officeholders could represent more deeply the diversity of opinion of the populace at large, than any one person could.  They could be elected with partyless proportional representation using direct popular Reweighted Range Voting.

The executives could deliberate and vote among themselves to decide which ones would be ready to handle emergencies at any given time, and they could delegate any executive authority that the branch has, to the one so designated.  Any ongoing policy started on an emergency basis, the group could overturn when they have time to meet, discuss, and vote.

In a further refinement to this system, once the public determines who will fill the five executive positions, every two years the public could reassign voting weights to the five, which wieghts they could wield when voting on acts of the executive branch.


Would you support this proposal under any conditions?

5%6 votes
15%16 votes
61%64 votes
5%6 votes
11%12 votes

| 104 votes | Vote | Results

Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags


More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site