Skip to main content

Rick Santorum and Newt Gingrich at debate during campaign for the 2012 Republican presidential nomination
When punditry and political careers are interchangeable, the results are self-serving by definition.
I've got to hand it to CNN, they're really giving their all to make sure the new version of Crossfire is just as much of a political cesspool as the previous version tried so hard to be.
Yesterday we reported that Crossfire host Newt Gingrich may have broken ethical rules for conflicts of interest set forth by CNN's EVP of standards and practices Rick Davis.

Today, those rules appear to have changed. In a statement to Media Matters, Davis clarifies the network's new ethics policy for disclosing potential conflicts of interest:

The short version is that Media Matters caught Gingrich violating supposed CNN network standards by having a PAC that gave cash to politicians who were guests on the show without disclosing those ties. In response, CNN has now clarified that Crossfire will not be held to ethics standards at all because that would be hard. At the beginning of the month, the standard was this:
"If Newt is helping fund a candidate and that candidate's on the show, or being discussed on the show, of course he'll disclose that," [CNN Executive Vice President Rick Davis] said. "Disclosure is important when it's relevant."
And immediately after Media Matters pointed out that wasn't happening, the new Newt-based standard became this:
We are clarifying the policy and making it clear Newt Gingrich is not in violation. The policy: If a Crossfire co-host has made a financial contribution to a politician who appears on the program or is the focus of the program, disclosure is not required during the show since the co-host's political support is obvious by his or her point of view expressed on the program."
Translation: The very nature of the show is to be a cesspool of moneyed insiderism, a pointless crank-fest of lobbyists and special interests often tied to each other and to the hosts themselves, and if we had everyone involved in this open sewer disclose when their own financial interests might be affected by the claims they or their professional guests were pontificating on the whole show would be 20 minutes of such disclaimers followed by two minutes of actual show.

More on Crossfire below the fold.

This is, of course, why Crossfire should have stayed sealed in its coffin. The very point of the show is to elevate he-said, she-said media "analysis" from figures whose very livelihoods are manufacturing those ideological points of view for consumption by the public. The audience need not be told which statements are facts and which ones are lies. The audience need not be told that so-and-so was booked as a guest because Newt Gingrich's personal PAC or private ventures have an ongoing relationship with them. It is cable newsism in its purest, uncut form: an infomercial on behalf of those in power, regardless of merit, and a monument to the crass faux-punditry notion that every last issue has two equal and opposite sides to it, even if one of the sides must be propped up by a racist, a flat-earther, or a professional liar.

Informing the public as to what the precise interests of the various parties in an national political argument are and what they stand to gain from their positions would seem to be the highest and best form of journalism. Instead we get shows celebrating the positions and dismissing the interests outright, and when any of those interests inadvertently come to light we get hurried re-interpretations of ethics rules explaining that those personal interests are unimportant and irrelevant to the purpose of the show.

Crossfire died because it had turned into a national embarrassment, a 30-minute argument for the sake of argument, a show devoted entirely to heat and openly contemptuous of light. It came back because the rest of the political media sank low enough to make it sound reasonable again.

Originally posted to Hunter on Fri Sep 27, 2013 at 11:45 AM PDT.

Also republished by Daily Kos.

EMAIL TO A FRIEND X
Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags

?

More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site