Skip to main content

Cross-posted to ShowMeProgress.

The Conservative Political Action Conference (CPAC) regional convention was held yesterday (Sept. 28) in St. Charles, Missouri, just outside of St. Louis. According to the St. Louis Post-Dispatch report, the main activity at this conference was not a measured consideration of conservative policy ideas, but rather railing at the dreaded liberals and plotting the rightwing battle strategy.

The invective seems to have run high. One of the organizers of the conference, though, held forth on the liberal decadence of contemporary Americans in a way that points out all too clearly one of the main failures of conservative ideology, which is its lack of an accurate historical compass:

“Conservatives are angry,” Al Cardenas, chairman of the American Conservative Union, told the gathering. “We’re witnessing the first generation of Americans who, instead of asking what they can do for America, are far too eager to accept liberal platitudes about what America can do for them.”
Liberal platitudes? That's rich coming from characters who like to beat drums, tootle on fifes and refer to themselves exclusively as "we the people." Where I come from, folks are pretty sure that government by and of the people means government for the people - we know our Constitution just as well as any conservative and we know what government "for the people" entails. We know that in the first sentence of the Constitution, "we the people" set government the task of securing the "general welfare."

Nor is the current generation the first to believe that securing the general welfare, making life better for Americans, is one of the most important tasks of government. We know that we are part of a proud tradition that views government as responsible, first of all, for the needs of its citizens.    

My generation, born in the 1940s, was the beneficiaries of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and of Lyndon Johnson's  "Great Society,"  whose numerous initiatives included Medicare, The Office of Economic Opportunity, The National Endowment for the Arts and Humanities, The Wilderness Protection Act, and extensive consumer protection regulations, as well as a "War on Poverty" that was, despite rightwing claims to the contrary, measurably successful in improving the lives of many Americans.

My mother's generation, born in the 1920s, was  saved from the horrors of the Great Depression by the many government programs of the New Deal - in my mother's case, literally saved from childhood starvation thanks to a government helping hand. Later, Social Security, one of the many products of Franklin Roosevelt's brain trust, insured her a secure old age - as it does for me.

My father's generation, born in the first decade of the twentieth century, participated in the Progressive Movement that saw the expansion of public education, government regulation of business to insure fair practices, electoral reform that targeted the corruption of the Gilded Age pols, income taxes to insure that the obscenely wealthy capitalists of the era paid their fair share, along with the expansion of labor unions.  

Liberals and Progressives know that the work of insuring the general welfare is an important part of government. That's why we elected a President who promised to reform a moribund,"free market" health care system that served fewer and fewer people at greater and greater expense. We know from sad experience that we can't leave our welfare to the workings of a blind "free" market whose ascendency still animates rightwing wet dreams. From the Gilded Age to the Bush recession, our history tells us that the radical conservative prescription does not work.  

Sadly, Mr. Cardenas and his angry conservatives would like to take us back to the bad old days. No taxes, no regulations, massive financial inequality, horrendous working conditions, a government that exists only to serve the needs of a wealthy elite. They claim to be worried about a culture of dependency. Cut food stamps, they say but hand out agricultural subsidies to rich farmers and Big Oil; cut cancer research, but throw tax "incentives" at corporations. Mr. Cardenas is right; there are Americans who expect government handouts - and you'll find them writing the checks that support the political aspirations of many of the politicians who attend CPAC.

I would say to Mr. Cardenas that liberals are angry too. We're more than angry; we sick-at-heart that in the light of our history there are still people in this country willing to stand with Al Cardenas and his cohorts and say I've got mine, the rest of you chumps can go to hell.

Originally posted to Thisbe on Sun Sep 29, 2013 at 12:15 PM PDT.

Also republished by Community Spotlight.

Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags


More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

Click here for the mobile view of the site