Skip to main content

"I don't want to abolish government. I simply want to reduce it to the size where I can drag it into the bathroom and drown it in the bathtub."
Grover Norquist
Americans For Tax Reform, 2004

“We’re not going to be disrespected. We have to get something out of this. And I don’t know what that even is.”
Marlin Stutzman (R-Indiana)
U.S. House Of Representatives, 2013

These two quotes, issued from the mouths of Tea Party demagogues, stand in obvious contradiction to one another. But together, they perfectly illustrate the dangerously schizophrenic nature of today's Republican Party, and just how mindlessly driven by hate and fear they have become. So insane are they, that they (as well as many on the Left) have collectively failed to either realize or acknowledge something of critical importance in the context of the current government shutdown: while they may be losing ground in the short term, when it comes to their long-term agenda – dismantling a government they see “as the enemy, an oppressor that works primarily as the protector of and provider for African-Americans, to the detriment of everyone else,” according to Joan Walsh in, one manufactured crisis at a time – the Republicans are winning. Consider the following, taken from yesterday's International Business Times:
“For weeks, neither Democrats nor Republicans have mentioned the fact that Democrats, for the sake of keeping the government open, agreed to House Speaker John Boehner’s request to pass a short-term spending bill that does not touch the automatic spending cuts, called sequestration, currently in effect. But on Tuesday, Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nev., began to bring up the issue.

When Senate Democrats passed what has been referred to as a “clean CR” -- a continuing resolution to fund the government without any anti-Obamacare provisions attached -- they did so at the sequester level, essentially conceding that they were not going to get their way on spending, at least not now. If the House and Senate ultimately go to a conference to hash out their two budget agreements, then the spending level will be up for negotiation again.”

This is a major concession from the Democrats; even if Speaker Boehner were to concede this victory right now and pass a clean CR, it would merely mean a return to sequestration status quo, which has already crippled tens if not hundreds of thousands nationwide. And with rumors of yet another round of 'grand bargain' talks on the horizon, it's hard to wonder just how firm Democratic resolve will remain as the shutdown crawls inexorably, painfully on. When Nancy Pelosi resorts to apologia for not pleading loudly enough with Republicans for the American public to hear, you know the public is in trouble.

Never ones to allow their victim the dignity of a graceful defeat, the lunatic fringe of the Republican Party continues to whip the remainder of the House into a frothing, rabid mass, refusing to accept the Democrats' sequester concessions in favor of their myopic pursuit of the repeal and/or delay and/or defunding and/or whatever of the Affordable Care Act. IBT reports:

“From the Republicans' point of view, however, CR spending levels are seen as holding the line rather than a victory. And with conservative primary challengers waiting in the wings, many Republican members could run into opposition from the right if they try to sell the spending level as a win and move on...But their strategy of avoiding a budget conference and using crises to pass legislation has succeeded in bringing down spending levels. It led to the beginnings of sequestration in the 2011 Budget Control Act, and to the implementation of the cuts beginning in 2013.”
So even if they lose the fight over Obamacare (which they most likely will, by the way; according to the Washington Post, “Obama has little reason to engage Boehner until the latter supplies more specifics...If the speaker is seeking cover for another defund-Obamacare gambit, the White House should not bite.”), they'll still have managed to chip yet another layer of protection and support for millions of struggling Americans at a time when they desperately need it. They'll also have managed to do enough peacocking (I'm looking at you, Ted Cruz) to satiate, albeit temporarily, the bottomless appetite for machismo and hippie-punching political theater at the base, going a long way towards ensuring maintaining their stranglehold on the House through the 2014 mid-terms. Failing that, the agenda will be preserved, as there's an endless supply of Republican wind-up tin soldiers ready to be paraded out the moment any one of them outlives their usefulness, ready to talk about how climate change is a hoax, Obama is a socialist, and how the ACA is no different than crack cocaine.

Many pundits have pontificated that the current government shutdown is merely a byproduct of the fight over Obamacare. In this, they are correct inasmuch as this particular fight, drastic though its consequences might be in both the immediate and long term, is merely the latest skirmish in the relentless, psychotic barrage of a hive-minded entity hell-bent on the destruction of an enemy they perceive to be as intractable as they are: the American government.

From Nixon's “Southern Strategy”, to the tackiness of Old Man Reagan's “welfare queens” and “young bucks”, to Newt “Babyface” Gingrich's incessant labelling of Obama as the “food stamp president”, the conservative movement has been on a 40-year blitzkrieg, having utterly convinced themselves long ago that the only thing holding the great unwashed masses back from rising up and decimating America's Great White Plutonomic Heritage is a perpetual boot to their throat. In addition, a sycophantic, simpering corporate media establishment has failed to, nay, has refused to draw the connection between this current debacle and all those that have come before it, firmly convinced that balance trumps accuracy when it comes to earning ratings...and paychecks. The way things are going, it won't be long before Grover Norquist will be able to spare the bathtub and spoil the bucket when it comes to his drowning victims. Petit mort, anyone?

Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags


More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site