Skip to main content

The current state of the Republican party mirrors that of the Democratic party in the early 1970s. The Democratic Party at that time was perceived as the party of hippies, feminists, radicals, black panthers and other undesirebles. As the Vietnam war and counterculture movement ramped up middle class and working class whites became fed up with the democratic party. Democrat positions on Issues such as busing, patriotism, drugs and welfare were not supported by a frustrated and angry electorate. In 1972 , the democrats ran George McGovern, an anti-war candidate and unapologetic liberal on most issues except abortion. The republicans ran Richard Nixon, the "champion" of the silent majority of middle class and working class whites who were former democrats. Richard Nixon won an unprecedented( for a republican) 60.7% of the popular vote to McGovern's 37.5%. Countless working class whites and middle class whites voted agains the democrat and many union workers went for Nixon. George Meany, the afl-cio(major labor union) leader endorsed Nixon over McGovern mainly because of Mcgovern's stance on the war. McGovern represented a democratic party which had collapsed and become a faction of interest groups instead of a party with a coherent message. True democrats who had not voted for nixon were more likely to identify as a feminist, homosexual, black, hispanic or environmentalist instead of democrat. These groups responded to single issues and would not support candidates who didn't support their issue. For feminists the issue might be legalizing abortion or equal pay legislation, for blacks expansion of affirmative action, and for homosexuals marriage equality. Though the issues might have been supported by a decent portion of americans there was almost always an angry majority who opposed the programs. This group of silent, hard-working, tax paying, law-abiding americans represented a forgotten middle class who demanded 'law and order' and an end to the counterculture movements. Many surely felt their america was being taken from them by a bunch of interest groups and intellectuals. During the time period between 1972 to 2008 the democratic candidate won more than 50% of the vote once, when Jimmy Carter won 50.1% in 1976 running an anti-washington campaign. There were 3 democrat terms and 6 republican terms and from 1972 to 2012 the democrats have been unable to win 50% of the white vote once. The Democrat vote share of whites has ranged from a low of 32% for Mcgovern in 1972 to highs of 47% for Carter in 1976 and 43% for Clinton in 1996. The Democrats were forced to run away from their true base during this time period and promised an end to big government programs, overregulation and runaway government spending. Carter and Clinton(and Obama) have encouraged or at least considered deregulation and an end to big government programs while adopting republican policy ideas. However, This will likely all change over the next decade.

President Obama has fractured and defeated the republican party in the same manner Nixon fractured the democrats. The democratic party, to an extent, had fractured itself with the rise of the new politics wing of the party. The previously mentioned interest groups had grown disenfranchised with the labor union afl-cio pro vietnam base that was represented by Hubert Humphrey, Ed Muskie, and Scoop Jackson. These democrats bowed down to the labor union and business interests the same way the modern moderate republican party is controlled by wall street and corporations. The McCain and Bush wings of the party are much like the democrat establishment of the early 70s facing a revolt from the new politics wing. So who are the new politics, Hunter S. Thompson wing of the gop? None other than the tea party. Now obviously The Thompson-McGovern wing had different interests than the modern day hostage takers that represent the gop but they both represented or represent the same sort of disaffected loud minority that the public looks down upon. The Radical Christian, sexist, women's body controlling, single mom hating, libertarian, possible racist is our modern day hippie or black panther. They hold rallies with racist signs, make arrogant comments about women and gather around at meetings to yell at their moderate establishment representative who they feel doesn't care about them. Now maybe it is hard to believe that the majority of the public has turned on the tea party especially with the previous republican presidential candidate winning 48% of the vote so here is a pollster's take to reassure us

Andrew Kohut is the founding director and former president of the Pew Research Center. He served as president of the Gallup Organization from 1979 to 1989.

http://articles.washingtonpost.com/...

In my decades of polling, I recall only one moment when a party had been driven as far from the center as the Republican Party has been today.

The outsize influence of hard-line elements in the party base is doing to the GOP what supporters of Gene McCarthy and George McGovern did to the Democratic Party in the late 1960s and early 1970s — radicalizing its image and standing in the way of its revitalization. In those years, the Democratic Party became labeled, to its detriment, as the party of “acid, abortion and amnesty.” With the Democrats’ values far to the left of the silent majority, McGovern lost in a landslide to Richard Nixon in 1972.

While there are no catchy phrases for the Republicans of 2013, their image problems are readily apparent in national polls. The GOP has come to be seen as the more extreme party, the side unwilling to compromise or negotiate seriously to tackle the economic turmoil that challenges the nation.

It is no surprise that even elements of the Republican leadership that had been so confident of a Mitt Romney victory — including when it was clear that he was going to lose the election — are now looking at ways to find more electable candidates and cope with the disproportionate influence of hard-liners in the GOP. Republican National Committee Chairman Reince Priebus only scratched the surface this past week when he dissected the party’s November defeat: “There’s no one reason we lost. Our message was weak; our ground game was insufficient; we weren’t inclusive; we were behind in both data and digital; and our primary and debate process needed improvement. So there’s no one solution. There’s a long list of them.”

For decades, my colleagues and I have examined the competing forces and coalitions within the two parties. In our most recent national assessments, we found not only that the percentage of people self-identifying as Republicans had hit historic lows but that within that smaller base, the traditional divides between pro-business economic conservatives and social conservatives had narrowed. There was less diversity of values within the GOP than at any time in the past quarter-century.

The party’s base is increasingly dominated by a highly energized bloc of voters with extremely conservative positions on nearly all issues: the size and role of government, foreign policy, social issues, and moral concerns. They stand with the tea party on taxes and spending and with Christian conservatives on key social questions, such as abortion rights and same-sex marriage.

Republicans, the tea party in particular are seen as racist sexist, and too extreme in other polls and it is clear the silent majority of voters are fed up with them the same way a different silent majority viewed Mcgovern and the new politics wing of the left  Ted Cruz, Rand Paul, and others can be seen as modern day McGoverns minus honesty, decency, and care for the common man. The Republican tea partiers have put a face on their acid, amnesty, and abortion wing and infiltrated their party. The republicans only hope for winning elections is a right wing DLC that supports moderate solutions, tolerance on social issues and an end to interventionist foreign policies. Clinton was able to support law and order, globalization trade policies, less ambitious affirmative action policies and the safe, rare, legal position on abortions that the majority of the public supported then. The same compromises clinton made must be made by the gop whether or not that includes Obamacare and other centirst solutions. The problem for the gop, and the possible reason why they may never recover, is their unilateral opposition to obamacare along with the gop new politics wing infiltrating congress. If obamacare is not repealed republicans are going to have a tough time running against a likely popular government program and will have to embrace it something the tea party and even moderates are likely to oppose. Assuming they accept obamacare the next problem is the opposition the tea party members in congress will have to compromise on social issues and immigration. The tea party members may never support legalized abortion, gay marriage and immigration, while the establishment will. Since many of the new politics wing will sit out elections republicans may not be able to beat any democratic candidate progressive or moderate. While the Democrat Leadership Council moved the party to the right they never faced true new politics opposition in congress. There were never a hundred feminists, environmentalists, black panthers, socialists and others in congress during the 70s 80s, and 90s opposing the establishment wing of the party. The gop has a much tougher task as many in the party don't see a problem at all and believe the party should move to the right. The republicans quite possibly are in a bigger hole than the democrats in the early 70s and they don't realize it.

EMAIL TO A FRIEND X
Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags

?

More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

  •  Lot of RWSM dog whistles in there ... (5+ / 0-)

    'democrat party'

    'bowed down to the labor unions'

    'the party of hippies, feminists, radicals, black panthers and other undesirebles'

  •  Their extremists got elections & congressional (1+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    mookins

    districts fixed.

    I don't recall very progressive Dems being elected in the face of evil Nixon elections, but I was a kid, then.

    As long as their base stays energized we will have them for a long time. They are still useful idiots for the evil rotten 1%.

    If we beat them enough, they may STFU & go hide under their rock again. I am glad that they have identified themselves.

    nosotros no somos estúpidos

    by a2nite on Wed Oct 23, 2013 at 09:20:09 AM PDT

  •  Please provide the link to Kohut's analysis (1+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    Alna Dem
  •  Fair Use warning! (1+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    mookins

    The previous commenter is absolutely right. Please edit down to a few paragraphs of quoted material and provide a link.

    Exaggeration is a billion times worse than understatement.

    by Alna Dem on Wed Oct 23, 2013 at 09:20:22 AM PDT

  •  It's not the same. Liberal Democrats (4+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    a2nite, mookins, nogo postal, highacidity

    argued for things that on policy terms have been proven historically correct: a cleaner environment, economic justice, racial equality, improved education, nuclear non-proliferation, ending the Vietnam war, and changing the cold war to a battle of ideas rather than militarism.  Divisions among Democrats cost them the 1968 election (along with the traumatic assassinations of MLK and RFK and the continuing quagmire of the Vietnam war).  Nixon won re-election in 1972 because  of continued Democratic divisions and his own willingness to adapt large parts of the liberal agenda.  We have an EPA because of him.  Nixon was also.....sane.  We would welcome such a voice in the GOP today.  

    What killed the Democrats in the 1970s was the oil shocks of the mid to late 1970's and the recession it provoked, and the Iranian hostage crisis.  It made the people take a second look at the Republican party and Reagan had the right message for the times.  In addition, the GOP's ability to exploit the Southern Strategy permanently peeled away a previously Democratic voting bloc (incidentally, when Lyndon Johnson signed the Civil Rights Act he said that 'we have lost the South for a generation'.  He made that choice willingly and history has validated him).

    Global Shakedown - Alternative rock with something to say. Check out their latest release, "A Time to Recognize": Available on iTunes, Amazon, Google Play, Spotify and other major online music sites. Visit http://www.globalshakedown.com.

    by khyber900 on Wed Oct 23, 2013 at 09:29:06 AM PDT

    •  Not that the democrats didn't stand for something (1+ / 0-)
      Recommended by:
      mookins

      but Nixon changed the country you say he was willing to adopt large parts of the liberal agenda but the agenda he put forward doesn't matter. After Nixon democrats struggled to get 50% of the popular vote in elections and barely won in 1976 amid a presidential resignation and slow economy, clinton beat a divided gop when perot got in, Obama is the only democrat in decades to win more than 50 twice and more importantly Obama is the rough equivalent of nixon. His health care proposal is based on a republican proposal that half the gop supported in the 90s and would have been loved by republicans in the 70s and 80s. He is a center -center right president the way Nixon was center left. He supports cap and trade from the gop but his legacy will be of a new progressive country at least possibly. The Republicans became more conservative after each presidency after Nixon and they dominated the public sphere until democrats gave them nearly everything they wanted.

    •  You are right about Nixon. I hated him, but, (0+ / 0-)

      compared to today's Republicans, he looks like a flammin' liberal....
      My, how things have changed.......

  •  The Democrats Became Economic Conservatives (1+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    mookins

    after Nixon so they had nothing to offer working and middle class Americans, while they had social issues like abortion and integration to help drive off whites.

    Carter didn't revive LBJ's War on Poverty, Clinton didn't repeal Reaganomics but advanced it in welfare reform and trade among other areas, and Obama as we know passed the Heritage / Romney Republican health reform and is working to further expand offshoring and free trade.

    The main reason Democrats have regained appeal is because the Republicans have become so strident and extreme. There hasn't been a progressive economic message or option for the mainstream since Disco and there isn't one on the horizon.

    We are called to speak for the weak, for the voiceless, for victims of our nation and for those it calls enemy.... --ML King "Beyond Vietnam"

    by Gooserock on Wed Oct 23, 2013 at 10:22:33 AM PDT

  •  If the GOP continues to flame out then it's (0+ / 0-)

    going to happen regardless of the various reasons.

    -You want to change the system, run for office.

    by Deep Texan on Wed Oct 23, 2013 at 10:54:04 AM PDT

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site