Skip to main content

House Energy and Commerce Committee, full committee hearing, August 1, 2013
Thursday's "monkey court" posing as a House Energy and Commerce Committee Obamacare oversight hearing ostensibly focused on the contractors responsible for creating the HealthCare.gov website, but what it of course really was was an attempt by Republicans to pretend they care about the implementation of the law they've tried to repeal more than 40 times, with a good bit of administration bashing thrown in.
Republicans pressed four contractors appearing before the House Energy and Commerce Committee on why they had told Congress in September that everything was on track, only to go off the rails in October. GOP lawmakers said both the contractors and the administration had not been forthcoming about the looming failure of the pivotal piece of President Barack Obama’s signature domestic achievement. [...]

Committee chairman Fred Upton (R-Mich) said the central question was accountability.
“Over the months leading up to the Oct. 1 launch, top administration officials and lead contractors appeared before this committee, looked us in the eye and assured us repeatedly that everything was on track,” Upton said. “Except that it wasn’t, as we now know too well.”

None of which really helps get HealthCare.gov work better, or make it easier for would-be consumers to get the health insurance they've been waiting for since the law passed. Of course not. That's not why Republicans had this hearing, or any of the inevitable multitude of future ones.

Originally posted to Joan McCarter on Thu Oct 24, 2013 at 11:09 AM PDT.

Also republished by Daily Kos.

EMAIL TO A FRIEND X
Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags

?

More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site