Skip to main content

A man fills out an information card during an Affordable Care Act outreach event hosted by Planned Parenthood for the Latino community in Los Angeles, California September 28, 2013. REUTERS/Jonathan Alcorn
With enrollment data coming in well below expectations and President Barack Obama's numbers hitting all-time lows, it's clear that the botched Obamacare implementation has become a bona fide political problem.

The enrollment numbers are actually not that terrible. While the media and Republicans are focusing on the roughly 100K that have chosen a plan, fact is that 846,000 have completed their applications, but haven't chosen a plan. Part of that is technical difficulties. Part of that is people doing their due diligence before making an important decision. Part of it is procrastination. Why spend too much time now doing something that won't take effect until January?

If the enrollment numbers remain low in late December and January, then that would certainly be cause for concern. But right now? During Romneycare's first enrollment month, 130 people had signed up—130. But the optics of those numbers aren't great, particularly given previous administration-supplied projections.

On the other hand, the optics of Obama's broken promise that everyone would be able to keep their insurance are brutal. We are in "Read my lips, no new taxes" territory. Sure, Obama's claim was supposed to apply only to employer-provided insurance, but he never qualified it as such. So now we're subjected to endless stories about people losing their (crappy substandard) insurance, even though Obama said they wouldn't.

So enter Sen. Mary Landrieu's fix to this issue (see here and here for details). In short, it would allow people to keep their crappy individual insurance policies, but insurance companies would be unable to keep selling them to new customers, and they'd have to let their customers know why the government considers their policies crap and point them to the exchanges for other options. The idea may not be a home run on the policy side, but Democrats don't have the benefit of perfect policy having botched this thing so badly (from original passage to implementation). But even on the policy, it's not terrible.

But on the politics? Woo-boy it's a winner! Remember, some policies are being cancelled because they are substandard. Some are being cancelled because insurance companies are trying to scam their customers into more expensive plans. In both cases, the problem is the insurance companies.

Right now, the blame is being put on Obama and the Democrats. This bill would turn things around and put the pressure exactly where it belongs: on insurance companies and obstructionist Republicans.

Republicans are acting as if these insurance cancellations are the worst thing since Hitler. Well, put them on the spot: Are they really interested in mitigating the law's unintended injustices (whether real or perceived), or do they merely want to undermine its implementation for sabotage purposes?

We know the answer, of course. Landrieu's bill doesn't have a prayer of passing. Republicans will obstruct it every step of the way. But instead of having Obama taking away your insurance, we'll reverse the equation: It'll now be Republicans defending the ability of insurance companies to cancel those policies.

Heading into 2014, that may be the difference between retaining the political high ground, or facing another 2010. Landrieu's gambit is genius.

Originally posted to kos on Wed Nov 13, 2013 at 01:37 PM PST.

Also republished by Louisiana Kossacks and Daily Kos.

EMAIL TO A FRIEND X
Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags

?

More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

Sylv, Armando, Bill in Portland Maine, Subterranean, donna in evanston, CleverNickName, eeff, exNYinTX, Creosote, Doctor Who, TheMomCat, afox, boadicea, vmckimmey, fumie, dksbook, pollwatcher, Texknight, SneakySnu, ManhattanMan, TexDem, Kentucky DeanDemocrat, QuarterHorseDem, wdrath, chantedor, defluxion10, rlharry, JayBat, side pocket, JayDean, TexasLefty, eve, murrayewv, Gowrie Gal, Recovering Southern Baptist, marina, PDiddie, blueyedace2, Robin7459, sandrad23, boofdah, Fury, kaliope, mph2005, lgmcp, barbybuddy, Aliosman, hungrycoyote, rl en france, raptavio, smokeymonkey, Libby Shaw, Clive all hat no horse Rodeo, kurt, Little, PatConnors, sephius1, fabucat, BeninSC, Chief9toe, Habitat Vic, hawaii2, Wanda517, AdamSelene, puakev, nicteis, Matt Z, flumptytail, deepeco, Bridge Master, Rumarhazzit, ImpeachKingBushII, TomP, VA Breeze, MKinTN, thankgodforairamerica, TruthFreedomKindness, mn humanist, wayoutinthestix, DarkHawk98, Involuntary Exile, monkeybrainpolitics, tofumagoo, icebergslim, mattc129, JamieG from Md, artmartin, juca, bobatkinson, tari, Remediator, TheOpinionGuy, jfromga, Kind67, Larsstephens, ruscle, cassandraX, Railfan, hotdamn, Its the Supreme Court Stupid, smileycreek, David PA, 2questions, renzo capetti, elginblt, 4kedtongue, kenwards, ericlewis0, stevenaxelrod, catlady, Onomastic, kerflooey, Mr MadAsHell, Jed Lewison, PorridgeGun, Tommy Aces, IB JOHN, ratcityreprobate, Cpqemp, Auriandra, DeadHead, pistolSO, Chrislove, ahumbleopinion, Farkletoo, FloridaSNMOM, doroma, dfwlibrarian, james321, Glen The Plumber, this just in, KingTag, Sue B, nomandates, DamselleFly, BKGyptian89, Linda1961, Setsuna Mudo, poopdogcomedy, Dewstino, Hey338Too, Timari, TheChocolateChips, The Marti, pierre9045, Penny GC, Zwenkau, Gurnt, micsimov, astage4444, IsaacKuo, Ameliorator

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site