Skip to main content

On this morning's "roundtable" discussion on WAMC radio (NPR affiliate in upstate NY, VT and Western Mass), one of the panelists argued that President Obama has never tried to reach out to Republicans and if he had they would have been more likely to work with him (not against him).  She seemed peeved, as most conservatives do, that Obama didn't invite Rethugs to dinner more often or schedule more playdates for the kids or something.  When one of the other panelists attempted to challenge her view, she exclaimed "Where is the evidence ?!?!."  Getting no answer in return she continued to trot out the "both sides are to blame" BS until the segment mercifully ended.

I obtained her email address and promised I would send her the evidence she seeks as well as evidence of Republican plans to obstruct Obama at all costs beginning with the Inauguration day meeting in 2009.

As I have a dissertation to write, I thought I would crowdsource this one and see if anyone can help with some links to evidence of Obama's attempts at bipartisanship.  I can remember a meeting with the entire Republican House conference in 2010, as well as passing their entire god-damned Healthcare bill, extending the Bush tax-cuts, ect.  There's also the Gingrich admission about the 2009 meeting and McConnell's famous "one term president" line.

Lets try to keep this civil. I don't want any links about how they are obstructing him because he is the black antichrist.

Thanks everyone!!

EMAIL TO A FRIEND X
Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags

?

More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

  •  appointed (2+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    offgrid, BlackSheep1

    LaHood to Transportation, Gates to Defense; then Hagel.

  •  Nope. (3+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    Mr Robert, art ah zen, FG

    This person can read the newspaper, do google searches, etc. if she wants to learn how Pres. Obama has reached out repeatedly to the GOP and offered on a whole host of issues (especially healthcare) compromises to the GOP. She does not WANT to learn the facts, so why in the world should we work like little bunnies to get her the information that she rejects anyhow?

    Arguing facts with the right is a fool's errand. I believe that not one Tea Partier has ever been convinced of anything by a liberal. If you can't convince them that baby Obama wasn't born in Kenya but rushed as a new infant to Hawaii in order to preserve his presidential viability, what exactly is the point of trying to convince them of anything?

    Nope.

    •  i'm sad to say that i agree with doc2. (0+ / 0-)

      none of these rwnjs will ever be convinced that obama is anything other than an underserving black man in THEIR white house.  birthers, truthers, tenthers, separatists, the list goes on and on.  the fact is they are blinded by hatred and bigotry and nothing will cure it.

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site