Skip to main content

“Not only the wealth, but the independence and security of a country, appear to be materially connected with the prosperity of manufacturers. Every nation, with a view to those great objects, ought to endeavor to possess within itself all the essentials of national supply. These comprise the means of subsistence, habitation, clothing, and defense” – Alexander Hamilton

To: Members of US Congress

OPEN LETTER

Created By: Ilya Galak ( R ), Michael Califra ( D ), Lisa Giangrande ( R ), Bill Taitt ( D )

A special thank you to Hesham El-Meligy for his advice

Staten Island, NY, 2013

“Not only the wealth, but the independence and security of a country, appear to be materially connected with the prosperity of manufacturers. Every nation, with a view to those great objects, ought to endeavor to possess within itself all the essentials of national supply. These comprise the means of subsistence, habitation, clothing, and defense” – Alexander Hamilton
“The American consumer is also the American worker, and if we don’t do something to protect our manufacturing base here at home, it is going to be hard to buy any retail goods” – Lindsey Graham
“Capitalism works better from every perspective when the economic decision makers are forced to share power with those who will be affected by those decisions” – Barney Frank
The biggest and most immediate threat to the health of out national economy is the sick state of the middle class.

Once the envy of the world and the great engine of prosperity that drove our national economy, the American middle class has been under pressure for more than thirty years. The offshoring of good-paying manufacturing jobs along with stagnant wages and the rising costs of everything from energy to health care and a college education have left the middle class hanging on to the American dream by their finger nails.

Yet there is a deafening silence from many of our elected representatives on the topic of bringing manufacturing jobs back to the United States.

With so much riding on the prosperity and growth a regenerated manufacturing base would bring to this country– which includes solutions for many of the social ills brought about by unemployment and service jobs that pay so little many Americans working full-time cannot afford to feed their families – that is simply unacceptable.

This nation is the wealthiest the world has ever known. It became an industrial power, then a superpower because of its ability to manufacture things. Yet we have let that base of our prosperity slowly erode as the investor class in search of ever-higher profits abandoned American workers in favor of cheap labor overseas.

Since the year 2000, more than 50,000 factories have closed their doors. The country lost 3.5 million manufacturing jobs, half a million of which were in high-tech industries such as telecommunications and electronics.

The addiction to cheap foreign labor at any price has gotten so extreme that, even as we speak, the MTA is planning to use Chinese steel in a massive project to replace the deck on the Verrazano-Narrows Bridge, even though, as the New York Times noted in an editorial on August 4th, 2013, “China has a very well-deserved reputation for producing inferior and often dangerous products.” That reputation was validated when California bought Chinese steel to renovate San Francisco’s Bay Bridge; a decision which led to delays and huge cost overruns because of faulty welds by the Chinese steel manufacturer.

Every time an American job is outsourced to China or other slave-wage countries, the American economy loses the spending power and tax revenues that worker’s job generates. Every time an American worker is forced to take a low-paying service job, that worker’s disposable income shrinks, making it harder for that worker to stay in the middle class and decreasing demand across the economy.

Simply put, we need more American manufacturing. We need to stop sending jobs and the dollars they generate overseas. We need to start exporting high-quality goods produced in the United States to markets around the world again, and to bring our trade deficits back into balance.

Our question to our elected representatives is simple. 1-What do you propose to bring back American manufacturing jobs? And 2- what do you propose to generate the development of new industries here in the United States?

We want you to work with us directly – citizens of from all backgrounds and experience – to cut though the bureaucracy and formulate policies that you can bring to the House of Representatives. These polices might include tax policy, education, direct government spending on our dilapidated infrastructure and other things that will not only create jobs for the millions who don’t now have them, but to regenerate the manufacturing base in this country, and thus the American middle class. This is the only way we can again have an economy that works for everyone and not just a select few. We would like you to present bi-partisan legislation, call it the “Make It in the USA” bill, no later than May 2014.

Our goal is to inspire a “Make it in the USA” movement, the sole purpose of which would be to fight to bring manufacturing back to the U.S.; save the manufacturing jobs we already have and to push for policies supporting new American industries whose jobs cannot be outsourced.

It is time to declare your allegiance to the American worker. It doesn’t matter if you’re a Republican or a Democrat; the one thing we should all be able to agree on is that this country needs its manufacturing sector back if it is going to regenerate the middle class. We are tired of politicians who use wedge issues to divide us. That is over. We want you to help us achieve the goals outlined here. Working for us is why we elect you. Working against us is why we won’t.

“We the People” have already begun brainstorming real world solutions. If you feel that you want to bring in your own policy experts to find answers, please do; if you want to use any of our ideas, you are welcome to do that, too. But we expect action.

Quotes:

Leonid Markman (I – Bklyn):

Our main problem is taxes. The higher the taxes, the more expensive it is to manufacture goods at home. Accordingly, businesses will look for ways to survive by reducing labor costs. The declining technological manufacturing, I believe, under today’s governing policies, will go straight to India. While the industries that will continue to do business with the well-to-do Chinese will be the ones who can’t afford to move their production elsewhere. India will be the second place, after China, where masses of American jobs will set sail to. The second problem is Healthcare. Most of our career politicians not only have no understanding of private business; I believe that they don’t even see the difference between big and small business. Now medium and small businesses, to survive the expenses of taxes and health insurance, will simply lay off employees and put more responsibility on themselves and their remaining workers. Look around, thousands of businesses, even those that have been running for decades, are closing their doors. There can’t be any talk of big earnings, only of survival. And lastly, businesses need more freedom to choose their strategies, and less regulation. In New York, inspectors go around the most vulnerable small businesses where the owners themselves work with maybe one or two employees. They give out fines for about $500-$1000, because price labels aren’t stuck on all the goods, or the minimal price for credit card purchases is not clearly displayed, or there’s a piece of paper lying just outside the doorway, which could have come from anywhere. This disorder in the factories of Russia once led to the revolution. Oh, I don’t know if such a comparison would be valid.

Source: Citizens Magazine

Steve Lawton (D – SI):

I think we need to find solutions to combating poverty. Here is the real problem. Three points to make. 1. Both parties are responsible for this. US “trade agreements” and currency markets have opened the door to find new markets to produce in to feed our demand. 2. The current situation was advocated for under the “free market” argument. Yet it is totally orchestrated and regulated by the Government, but in this case very favorable to American Corporations and not the American people. China’s industrial expansion has been made possible by the American Dollar. Most of their trade (although they are trying to change this now) is backed by the American dollar. So China is an extension of the American market now. 3. Organized Labor has been the only sizable objectors of these policies

Source: Staten Island Politics Facebook group forum

Richard Bell ( R – SI):

There is so much to say on this topic I could be here all day. I used to manufacture automation control devices. There are regulations from so many agencies you can’t count them and they are a big problem. Just one example, the DOT has regulations on how “hazardous” materials have to be shipped. There is no distinction between an eye dropper bottle size of acid and a railroad tank car size of acid. The regulations stipulate what size box it has to be shipped in, what the packing material must be, how many “hazardous” labels and what size the labels must be and exactly where the labels must be placed on the box. It’s all gone too far. I agree we must be smart and safe about such things, but these regulations more than doubled the cost of a gallon of acid for my business, which adds nothing to my product and only adds to the cost of my overhead. This adds to the cost to my customers and makes me less competitive with devices from Asia.

Joann Olbrich (D-SI):

1) Stop rewarding those companies that send American jobs overseas with tax breaks, and instead punish them by taking away their subsidies and tax breaks, and put heavy tariffs on goods manufactured outside the US. 2) Reward with tax breaks and subsidies those companies that produce in the United States, with American workers getting a living wage.

Source: Staten Island Politics Facebook group forum

Ilya Galak (R-SI):

Regarding the “race issue” and “social responsibility”: Jordan sneakers. They sell from $350.00 to $450.00. Regular good quality sneakers cost approx. $35. Kids of all races are crazy to purchase Jordan sneakers. I assume Michael Jordan makes a lot of money licensing his famous name. That is totally fine with me. The only question is – aren’t Jordan sneakers made in sweat shops in Singapore and Thailand? If yes, wouldn’t it be better if Jordan produced in our African -American communities? It would help people who are the most disadvantaged to get jobs –and training if the company supplied it – get help break the cycle of poverty and dependence? Training and jobs will lead to less crime in African –American communities. I am sure if his sneakers would bear the label “Made in United States,” Jordan’s business would be even more successful and a model for others.

Michael Califra (D-SI):

Don’t pressure the Fed to raise rates before a strong recovery is underway, which will help keep US exports competitive on world markets and help keep US factories open. Eliminate tax breaks that assist companies in moving production abroad. Pass a stimulus similar to the two-year $109 billion bill passed in the Senate last session – large enough to create 1.5 million construction jobs rebuilding our infrastructure, but stipulating that only US manufactured steel and other materials are used in those projects. Invest in high-speed rail, again using only US produced materials. Invest in a national smart-energy grid and enact a clean-energy program that focuses on renewable energy sources such as wind and solar, which moves us away from fossil fuels; this should include investing in the development of eclectic vehicle charging stations on Interstate highways to help facilitate the demand for those vehicles, all of which will require development of US manufacturing.

Elik Yuzhny (R-Bklyn):

As Montesquieu said: “Useless laws weaken the necessary laws.” Politicians compete with each other over who is going to propose and get more legislation approved. That is how they measure the effectiveness of politicians. Every day there are new laws and new regulations are coming from politicians, and tons of government agencies are popping up here and there. How much legislation do we need? Ten laws for each American? 20? 50? We have to start a different competition between politicians and agencies – who will propose to “repeal laws” and “repeal more regulations “.We need to stop creating all those absurd laws and regulations that kill our businesses and regulate our daily lives. We have to start repealing these laws to let people and businesses breathe. We need laws against political corruption, not for it.

Alan Galak ( D – Bklyn):

About a year ago I was fortunate enough to visit Italy. Among its many wonders was something I consistently saw in every souvenir shop and store I visited: easily more than half of all of the products said “Made in Italy.” In fact, one store had a huge sign glued onto its front window which blatantly said “Made in Italy; NO CHINA”.

By no means is this an isolated incident. Ever went shopping for home appliances? If you have, then you may have noticed how many quality refrigerators and microwaves the Canadians are making. Also, I’ve been reading and hearing on the news about how the Germans have maintained a good economy and an industrial sector rivaling China’s.

So we have countries today that have a healthy amount of manufacturing, all the while treating their workers in a civilized manner. Among the biggest factors attributing to their success is how their tax policies and incentives work. They reward companies that manufacture domestically, and penalize those that outsource (unlike us who do the exact opposite). But I am mostly saying is that there are success stories out there, and we should learn from them.

Poll

How to bring manufacturing jobs back to the USA?

0%0 votes
10%2 votes
25%5 votes
60%12 votes
5%1 votes

| 20 votes | Vote | Results

EMAIL TO A FRIEND X
Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags

?

More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

  •  Hi, New User. Any response to comments in your (5+ / 0-)

    first essay, posted several hours ago?

    Those who would give up the public interest to purchase military-grade assault rifles deserve neither.

    by yojimbo on Tue Dec 03, 2013 at 07:05:00 PM PST

  •  I can only hide rate you once in one day, but this (6+ / 0-)

    is clearly a diary filled with right wing talking points with a little, very little about poverty thrown in as a garnish.

    You will do much better if you remain with Michelle Malkin and her ilk over at the Family Security Matters.

    •  Yes. "Taxes, regulations are killing US jobs." (4+ / 0-)

      A rash of this stuff the last week or so; so many new users, too!
      Curious.

      Those who would give up the public interest to purchase military-grade assault rifles deserve neither.

      by yojimbo on Tue Dec 03, 2013 at 07:22:59 PM PST

      [ Parent ]

      •  And a Rash of Leftwing Talking Points (7+ / 0-)

        such as supporting tariffs, support for organized labor, and ending subsidies for offshoring.

        This isn't a simple case.

        We are called to speak for the weak, for the voiceless, for victims of our nation and for those it calls enemy.... --ML King "Beyond Vietnam"

        by Gooserock on Tue Dec 03, 2013 at 07:27:41 PM PST

        [ Parent ]

        •  I saw nothing about organized labor. (1+ / 0-)
          Recommended by:
          ilyagalak

          There was "a living wage." And a push towards renewable energy attributed to a man from Staten Island.
          Better framing would clarify what is probably a bipartisan effort to invigorate the Boroughs, but appears all over the map, narrative-wise.

          Those who would give up the public interest to purchase military-grade assault rifles deserve neither.

          by yojimbo on Tue Dec 03, 2013 at 07:41:56 PM PST

          [ Parent ]

        •  actually, Gooserock (2+ / 0-)
          Recommended by:
          Roger Fox, Susan from 29

          it IS a very simple case.  Google the diarist.  The presentation may have been less "simply" put together, for any number of strategic reasons that I wouldn't presume to guess at, but google is your friend in this instance, certainly.  

          Susan from 29 is right on this one.

          Words can sometimes, in moments of grace, attain the quality of deeds. --Elie Wiesel

          by a gilas girl on Tue Dec 03, 2013 at 07:59:05 PM PST

          [ Parent ]

        •  If we want a middle class, manufacturing is a (2+ / 0-)
          Recommended by:
          ilyagalak, Lujane

          necessity.  Ours is dying, bringing it back will hard, but for us to survive it will be required

          Rivers are horses and kayaks are their saddles

          by River Rover on Tue Dec 03, 2013 at 08:10:16 PM PST

          [ Parent ]

    •  My own decision (1+ / 0-)
      Recommended by:
      yojimbo

      Dear Susan, please let me make my own decision :-)
      Did you read the article, by the way? Any comments? Do you agree? Can we discuss issues?

      •  This is a site dedicated to electing more and (8+ / 0-)

        better Democrats. You have made it clear that you only vote for Republicans. Because, as you wrote elsewhere on the web,

        A Democrat’s election would depend on more people staying in poverty and on government assistance. If they were to become successful, they may end up voting Republican. This is something a Democrat cannot allow.

        Unfortunately, they don’t get or don’t care that you can’t just keep taking money from successful people; it will eventually run out.

        The reason I vote Republican is because I prefer success to be by far more prevalent than poverty.

        I read a lot.
        •  Delicious. (2+ / 0-)
          Recommended by:
          Susan from 29, kharma

          .................expect us......................... FDR 9-23-33, "If we cannot do this one way, we will do it another way. But do it we will.

          by Roger Fox on Tue Dec 03, 2013 at 07:43:30 PM PST

          [ Parent ]

        •  In the poster's defense, (4+ / 0-)

          this "open letter" is attributed to several authors, at least one of whom contributed a pro-Obama piece to this.

          The poster might hail from the other side of the aisle, but as Gooserock said, it looks more complicated.

          Looks to me like the bad rollout of an attempt at cross-posting.

          Those who would give up the public interest to purchase military-grade assault rifles deserve neither.

          by yojimbo on Tue Dec 03, 2013 at 07:54:10 PM PST

          [ Parent ]

          •  Real bad rollout, REAL BAD (3+ / 0-)
            Recommended by:
            Susan from 29, churchylafemme, CenPhx

            My issue is the real bad part has a bit of history.

            http://videos.silive.com/...

            What ever the author is attempting, real bad is a level of performance that the author appears to not be capable of rising above.

            And then throw in hes the Founder of the Jewish Tea Party.

            .................expect us......................... FDR 9-23-33, "If we cannot do this one way, we will do it another way. But do it we will.

            by Roger Fox on Tue Dec 03, 2013 at 08:02:54 PM PST

            [ Parent ]

          •  Normally, I always give the benefit of the doubt (3+ / 0-)
            Recommended by:
            yojimbo, churchylafemme, CenPhx

            to a new diarist, but really, the founder of the Jewish Tea Party? The guy who interviewed, gushed over the Russian Rush Limbaugh? I shudder to think of what else he wishes to cross post.

            And in the About section of the site you linked to is this:

            • Provide an opportunity for like-minded people to participate in an organizations that promotes ORIGINAL AMERICAN VALUES and The Constitution of the United States of America.
            The emphasis is in the original.
            •  I understand that. And I saw that. (3+ / 0-)
              Recommended by:
              ilyagalak, Lujane, Susan from 29

              But part of this game is wooing to the cause, right?
              And if in the Outer Boroughs, or wherever, an admitted Tea Party guy can find enough common ground with a neighbor that supported BHO's second term for them both to sign on to a letter, then maybe with dialogue the TP guy can be persuaded to move towards D.

              Sure, the first diary was, ahem... But this one suggests a willingness to discuss. After all, political leaning is usually not permanently black and white, but a spectrum of gray, even if one begins at one end or the other.

              Would that some of the opaquely verbose crypto-anarchists that post would... never mind.

              Those who would give up the public interest to purchase military-grade assault rifles deserve neither.

              by yojimbo on Tue Dec 03, 2013 at 08:23:09 PM PST

              [ Parent ]

          •  Answer to Yojimbo (2+ / 0-)
            Recommended by:
            yojimbo, Lujane

            At least somebody here understands what is going on :-)
            Seriously, you are correct. That is a team work I did initiate it, but many people from the far left to far right are with me. We are all American Citizens by the end of the day. If the country in trouble - we are all in trouble. Susan (see her comment above) indicated, that "This is a site dedicated to electing more and better democrats". I got different impression, I was sure that this site dedicated to make our country better and party line is secondary. Politicians want to Divide and Conquer, they want us to fight on issues. I want (and I did it on Staten Island) find a common ground and fight together against people, who outsource American jobs and killing our country. Any questions - please ask. I do not use any nick names, I am absolutely open...

        •  Respond to Susan (0+ / 0-)

          Susan, maybe a little later I will tell you my story (I am Russian from the former Soviet Union). But generally speaking, I am not afraid to change my mind on the issues, I am not afraid to tell "I am wrong", I am always learning, listen and respect others opinions. And accept any logical explanations.I wrote this article more than a year ago (or two years...). And I am not a politician, I am a professional electrical engineer. So I do not have to report to any party and hate any kind of propaganda. What else can I tell you?

      •  Just a suggestion, (0+ / 0-)

        Opening here with a sentence or two introducing what you're about to say, rather than just plunging into it, might be a helpful guide, just to orient the reader.

        Those who would give up the public interest to purchase military-grade assault rifles deserve neither.

        by yojimbo on Tue Dec 03, 2013 at 07:46:16 PM PST

        [ Parent ]

    •  You read that thing? (2+ / 0-)
      Recommended by:
      River Rover, Susan from 29

      What does it say? I tried to wade in but evacuated quickly.

  •  Hi, Ilya. Do you still believe that the Democratic (6+ / 0-)

    Party and labor unions simply copied their programs and slogans from Marx and Lenin, as you stated here?

    Q: Victor, we both went through the Soviet education system and memorized Karl Marx' Communist Manifesto and Lenin's works by heart. If we didn't we would not have gotten our diplomas. I personally think that the ideological heads of the Democratic Party and liberal labor unions simply copied their programs and slogans from there. What's your opinion on this?
    Family Security Matters

    If so, does that mean that you've joined us here on this Democratic(ish) website because you're a big fan of Marx and Lenin? Won't this confuse your fans on the conservative sites you frequent? I'm worried it could harm your reputation.

    •  Oh look I found some too (2+ / 0-)
      Recommended by:
      churchylafemme, Susan from 29

      "More RW drivel".

      Interview with co-founder of The Staten Island Tea Party Frank Santarpia

      Victor Topaller is known as the 'Russian Rush Limbaugh'
      http://www.examiner.com/...

      Founder of the Jewish Tea Party

      http://www.youtube.com/...

      .................expect us......................... FDR 9-23-33, "If we cannot do this one way, we will do it another way. But do it we will.

      by Roger Fox on Tue Dec 03, 2013 at 07:50:52 PM PST

      [ Parent ]

    •  Reply to Vilanova Rhodes (0+ / 0-)

      Dear Reply to Vilanova Rhodes, please see my respond to Susan above. And I'll be happy to discuss an Open letter with you. Our local movement on Staten island is growing. Many democrats and republicans joined our movement. I am here to make this movement ("Make It In  The USA") - a national movement, show people from the different states what we do on the Island.
      Thank you

      •  Just a thought. (2+ / 0-)
        Recommended by:
        CenPhx, Susan from 29

        THis site is explicitly intended to, as Susan said, "elect more and better Democrats." As stated by the owner,

        This is a Democratic blog, a partisan blog. One that recognizes that Democrats run from left to right on the ideological spectrum, and yet we're all still in this fight together. [...] Liberal? Yeah, we're around here and we're proud. But it's not a liberal blog. It's a Democratic blog with one goal in mind: electoral victory. [...]
        Daily Kos will be what Daily Kos is, and that oftentimes evolves. I know everyone wants their clearly defined rules, but nothing is that simple.

        This site is CERTAINLY NOT for all Democrats. Joe Lieberman learned that. Blanche Lincoln is about to learn it.

        This site is about more and better Democrats, not necessarily in that order.

        There's no love for the Tea Party, or Limbaugh, or Congressional Republicans here. But that doesn't preclude discussion of grassroots politics or other topics. But, advocacy for typical positions characterized as "Tea Party" or "Republican" will not succeed here. People here support things like a renewed American manufacturing base, but generally do not support things like deregulation, tax incentives to business at the expense of the poor and working class, social programs, Social Security, Medicaid, organized labor, civil rights, and so on. So, positions counter to these things will not get traction at this site.

        I certainly don't speak for the site, but there you go.

        Those who would give up the public interest to purchase military-grade assault rifles deserve neither.

        by yojimbo on Tue Dec 03, 2013 at 08:41:01 PM PST

        [ Parent ]

    •  Answer to Villanova Rhodes (0+ / 0-)

      Honestly, that is a very hard question to answer. I am not afraid anything. I am here under my real name and have nothing to hide. Again, I am an engineer, not a professional politician. I am former USSR resident - for me freedom of speech is everything. In Russia we did not have it. Regarding Marx - I just did read Marx again (couple weeks ago). Not everything is bad there, but this book is for the "ideal" society. If we would live by the book - we would have a great life. The problem is - corruption, there is no ideal society where everybody are brothers and sisters. We learned Marx and Lenin, they were our Icons, Gods (Forward, inequality, organized labor, corporate greed, revolution - we did learn it in pre-K, in school, in University) and at the same time, we had GULAG, the dictate of the KGB and CPSU. Everything is very complicated. In Karl Marx's Capital, he quotes an economist who says that if capital can get 100 percent profit, it will "trample on all human laws; 300 percent, and there is not a crime at which it will scruple, nor a risk it will not run...If turbulence and strife will bring a profit, it will freely encourage both." Everything is correct, but based on these slogans we got Stalin and KGB. But I know one thing for sure - without manufacturing our country is doomed. People who outsource the jobs are anti - americans. I have my own fashion manufacturing business in NY  and never outsourced anything, even when I was far right at the political map.  I do not know how to answer your question, Villanova Rhodes. Everything is complicated. If you are not Russian and did not live in the Soviet Union - you can not understand me right away. Especially English is my third language :-)

  •  Bring back jobs (4+ / 0-)

    Nope, dey is gone.

    I won't bother to address the gobs of RW BS, just to say the way that manufacturing will grow in the US is to look forward, not back.

    Example:

    Offshore Wind Turbines. As this market grows, planting these suckers in a 100 or 150 ft of water will create excellent paying jobs, probably starting at 100k.

    These types of jobs in emerging markets like renewable will be around for decades.

    GE Turbines are 60% made in the US, and GE is the #1 turbine manufacturer in the world.

    .................expect us......................... FDR 9-23-33, "If we cannot do this one way, we will do it another way. But do it we will.

    by Roger Fox on Tue Dec 03, 2013 at 07:39:18 PM PST

  •   some issues ? (1+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    Susan from 29

    This video taken at Zuccotti Park, apparently after Occupy was evicted, is labeled Occupy Wall St.

    And the video is just plain 100% stupid.

    http://videos.silive.com/...

    .................expect us......................... FDR 9-23-33, "If we cannot do this one way, we will do it another way. But do it we will.

    by Roger Fox on Tue Dec 03, 2013 at 07:57:33 PM PST

  •  I don't know what you are saying. (0+ / 0-)

    Mostly because I didn't read the diary. But I do think you got guts to publish whatever it is. So kudos.

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site