Skip to main content


Finally, someone of standing, brave enough to say what many of us have been thinking.

In a District Court of Law no less.  Without mincing words.

U.S. judge says phone surveillance program likely unlawful

by David Ingram and Mark Hosenball, -- Dec 16, 2013

(Reuters) - The U.S. government's gathering of Americans' phone records is likely unlawful, a judge ruled on Monday, raising "serious doubts" about the value of the National Security Agency's so-called metadata counter terrorism program.

"I cannot imagine a more 'indiscriminate' and 'arbitrary invasion' than this systematic and high-tech collection and retention of personal data on virtually every single citizen," U.S. District Judge Richard Leon, appointed by Republican President George W. Bush in 2002, wrote in a 68-page ruling.

Leon expressed skepticism of the program's value, writing that the government could not cite a single instance in which the bulk data actually stopped an imminent attack.

"I have serious doubts about the efficacy of the metadata collection program as a means of conducting time-sensitive investigations in cases involving imminent threats of terrorism," he wrote.


Many of us have "serious doubts about the efficacy of the metadata collection program."

Well said Judge Leon. Finally.

OK, so what's this Orwellian case about?  

Well for one thing, it gives 'Indiscriminant and Arbitrary invaded' upon citizens, us, the legal standing to sue those doing the invading. That, could be handy.

Federal judge says NSA's phone surveillance program is likely unconstitutional -- Dec 16, 2013

Judge Richard Leon of the US District Court for the District of Columbia wrote in an opinion released on Monday that plaintiffs who filed suit against the NSA in June have standing to challenge the spy agency’s program that collects telephony metadata pertaining to millions of Verizon subscribers every day.

 “The government,” Leon wrote, described the “advantages of bulk collection in such a way as to convince me that plaintiffs’ metadata -- indeed everyone’s metadata -- is analyzed, manually or automatically, whenever the government runs a query using the ‘seed’ a phone number to identifier associated with a phone for which the NSA has not collected metadata.”

“Because the government can use daily metadata collection to engage in ‘repetitive, surreptitious surveillance of a citizen’s private goings on,’ the NSA database ‘implicated the Fourth Amendment each time a government official monitors it,” Leon wrote, later equating the technology the feds rely on as being “almost Orwellian” in nature.

Chalk one up for restoring the 4th Amendment. Maybe our personal conversations, online or otherwise, are meant to stay personal and private,

-- like the Founders initially intended, afterall.

I hope more Judges step up like this, in defense of sanity, in defense of the Constitution.

If not, then what's to insure we aren't ALL 'arbitrarily' presumed to be guilty, in some grand National Security fishing expedition?

If not, then can the freedom of thought and speech and association, be far behind ... safe from the reaches of their all-invasive, all-seeing electronic dragnets?

Almost Orwellian, is indeed a good way to describe this through-the-looking-glass data collection activity.  Done in the name of security ... and to protect our freedom. Trash it to save it, who thought that one up?

As Orwell might have penned it himself:

Foundational principles, be damned. Long as they can see, track, and ultimately know everything.

What's the problem?   Just remember ...

“War is peace.
Freedom is slavery.
Ignorance is strength.”
Be strong, citizen-suspects. Because you just never know, who's watching ... nor why.

Originally posted to Digging up those Facts ... for over 8 years. on Mon Dec 16, 2013 at 05:32 PM PST.

Also republished by 11111000000.

Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags


More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

Bob Johnson, paradox, Superskepticalman, copymark, AaronInSanDiego, native, Gooserock, Shockwave, hubcap, Doctor Who, Dumbo, Einsteinia, Nate Roberts, ctsteve, wader, Farugia, brainwave, Lawrence, penguins4peace, mosesfreeman, radarlady, 3goldens, LakeSuperior, CTPatriot, run around, truong son traveler, ChemBob, YucatanMan, Laurence Lewis, fixxit, eru, lotlizard, stevemb, Tool, Shotput8, snoopydawg, LeftOverAmerica, detroitmechworks, Medium Head Boy, koNko, AoT, blueoasis, Rosaura, real world chick, JVolvo, ER Doc, Clive all hat no horse Rodeo, kurt, Tom Anderson, kurious, NonnyO, bluicebank, devis1, Dartagnan, psychodrew, yoduuuh do or do not, deepeco, sfbob, aliasalias, bnasley, HCKAD, jayden, SeaTurtle, bobswern, JML9999, TomP, salamanderanagram, petulans, Parthenia, Executive Odor, HarpboyAK, shortgirl, maggiejean, cybrestrike, greengemini, divineorder, nchristine, ewmorr, CanyonWren, gharlane, kevinpdx, ArthurPoet, Randtntx, The Free Agent, Lost and Found, TealTerror, sunny skies, Johnny Q, 4kedtongue, Publius2008, Oh Mary Oh, slice, Onomastic, annominous, Lost Left Coaster, StateofEuphoria, Teiresias70, CoExistNow, smiley7, boomerchick, Claudius Bombarnac, tardis10, Faroutman, myrmecia gulosa, MichaelNY, DeadHead, greenbastard, FloridaSNMOM, congenitalefty, Horace Boothroyd III, ricklewsive, oldpotsmuggler, rat racer, George3, Bisbonian, Heavy Mettle, Ray Pensador, goodpractice, GreenMother, Smoh, Demeter Rising, Another Grizzle, River Rover, Liberty Equality Fraternity and Trees, Skyye, Choco8, Pablo Bocanegra, benamery21

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site