Skip to main content

The U.S. Congress has demonstrated a particular knack for giving itself black eyes this year. As if shutting down the Federal government and then nearly causing the nation to default on its debt weren't enough, Congress decided to end the year on a low note by cutting off unemployment benefits for 1.3 million Americans.  Acting on its impeccable instinct for placing itself in the poorest possible light, Congress cut off these benefits a few days after Christmas. Genius!

According to a recent CNN poll, two-thirds of Americans rate the current Congress as the worst in their lifetime. This was across all demographic and political subgroups, with older Americans expressing the most negativity. I'd say Congress should consider itself lucky the numbers weren't worse.

Had I been included in the poll, I would have agreed with the majority.  This Congress has been terrible in terms of getting the people's business done.  Well, perhaps I should qualify that. It's been terrible at doing much for the 98%. At protecting the top 2%, it's done rather well.

What I find particularly disturbing about Congress since the Republicans took back the House in 2011 is the cruel streak demonstrated by those actions it does manage to take.  Failing to extend the unemployment benefits is just the latest example.  Remember how slow Congress was to authorize funding for disaster relief after Hurricane Sandy?  And how about the reduced funding for the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP)?  Like a schoolyard bully, Congress has shown a propensity for kicking people when they are down.

In the case of the unemployment benefits and SNAP, there were other ways of reaching the budget targets, but Congress chose to take punitive action against some of the most vulnerable in our society.

Reminds me of a quote from Johann Wolfgang von Goethe:

“You can easily judge the character of a man by how he treats those who can do nothing for him.”

Congress has certainly failed the character test in the last few years.

The problem, I think, is we're too often sending the wrong kind of person to Congress.  The last thing you want to do is elect someone who lacks compassion and is unable to empathize with those from different backgrounds. Giving such a person power over others is just asking for trouble. It's like putting the cool kids in charge of the nerds.  Beatings are going to follow.

Complacency and disengagement of the electorate get a lot of the blame here.  Too many reasonable people have mentally checked out and left it to the crazies like the Tea Party wingnuts to do the voting.  Not good.

And we've allowed the election process to become so coin-operated that it's very hard for a decent, caring person to make it into office with his or her moral compass intact.  Citizens United and the rise of Super PACs have turned elections into a kind of insane bidding war. Haven't seen a House or Senate seat for sale on eBay yet but one wonders if it's just a matter of time.

But, despite all this, I still believe we can turn this thing around.  Giving the House Speaker's gavel back to Nancy Pelosi and retaining Democratic control of the Senate are doable and necessary. Until the Republicans rid themselves of the Tea Party virus and become something much closer to the party of Lincoln again, I don't think they can be trusted with the responsibility of governing.

Let's make 2014 the year we take the House back from Darth Boehner and the dark side (aka the Tea Party).

Who's with me?

Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags


More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site