Skip to main content

If you've ever said, Thank you for your service to a man or woman in uniform and wondered what else you might be able to do to show your thanks, here's your chance.

Tonight, at 9pm Eastern, the military community will be holding a Town Hall on Twitter (#KeepYourPromise) and Facebook. We are hoping to join forces with a large number of civilians in order to fix what the Washington Post and the Wall Street Journal believe is a small adjustment to military pensions.

That small adjustment is a cut in COLA increases - the same kind of cut that Republicans keep talking about for Social Security. And the cuts total to large amounts in a family budget, anywhere from $80,000 to $120,000 per military retiree. Call this budget cut a test item - Congress is waiting to see how palatable it is to mainstream America. If it works here, why won't it work for Social Security?

And if you listen to their wording, it sounds pretty reasonable. It's a cut to 'working age retirees' who have the opportunity to make up the loss in their next job.

Let me tell you a couple of things about military retirement.

1. Retirement is a misnomer. Most military retirees will work a second job, if they can find one. And most won't go work in the DC Beltway for military contractors.

2. Military retirement is part of a compensation package intended to help keep quality Senior NCO's and officers serving. You can't exactly hire a Chief Master Sergeant off the street. If you want a quality service, you offer quality benefits.

3. Military retirement is half of base pay - it won't come close to what a soldier, sailor, Marine, or airman earns while on active duty since it won't include housing and allowances. Even with those extras, many military families have a hard time making it while on active duty. The idea that a military retirement is actually something to live off is a joke. It's more like a savings account to help pay for those things you couldn't save for while serving.

The fix? HR 3790. It's been referred to the House Armed Services Committee. And it's a simple fix with bi-partisan support and it's the only bill without any offsets. All other bills will have a hard time because they either call for offsets that are not acceptable to Democrats or not acceptable to Republicans.

The problem is that not everyone in the military community yet agrees on an approach. And, as you can imagine, we're a mixed group politically. Finding agreement can often be tough. This bill is great because it already has support from both parties. If either party wants an off-set, let them fight for that in the next budget bill.

That's part of why I'm asking YOU to join us tonight. Help keep the Twitter conversation flowing in a healthy way. It's one of the most helpful things you could do for the military community at this moment in time. Help correct misperceptions about those who support the military and about those that serve:

And while we're doing that, we can also Tweet in ways that actually help the cause. Let people know about HR3790. And make sure they know how to tweet their Representatives and their Senators.

Thanks in advance for your support. If you have any questions about military retirement, please ask in the comments below. I'll do my best to give you an educated response!

Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags


More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site