Skip to main content

These are the final five out of 15 non-negotiable core beliefs of the Tea Party, according to www.teaparty.org:

"11. Reducing business income taxes is mandatory."
There is a differentiation between small, medium and large (corporate) businesses. Since wide gaps in income inequality exist, there cannot be an across-the-board tax on incomes, i.e., a flat tax. With the latter, taxes would be set at the same percentage ("fairly"), but unequally precisely because of economic inequality in the first place. A progressive tax system is better, but that has been violated by tax loopholes, offshore tax havens, corruption, etc.

A heavy progressive tax system would be an answer with the wealthy paying taxes on all their income by eliminating the "perks," a more fair setting of income tax brackets, a fairer change in threshold limits, and a fairer change in tax bracket percentages.

Tea Partiers who support the flat tax think this would be unfair. But their version of taxation is only fair in name, not going beyond simple percentages to consider various factors.

"12. Political offices must be available to average citizens."
Another point anyone could agree on, but the appropriate skills/education should be a requirement.
"13. Intrusive government must be stopped."
Intrusive in what way? Tea Partiers seem to demand this without looking at any specifics. Did "states’ rights" slave owners think that government was intrusive in freeing the slaves? Yes. Today, however, racist attitudes are a little more closeted. But, Tea Party racism is self-evident when it comes to the issue of immigration.

Government has a duty to support the public interest. That means promoting the general welfare, as stated in the U.S. Constitution, not support slavery, racism, and corporate crimes.

"14. English as our core language is required."
"English Only" doesn't represent the multiculturalism in U.S. society. It can used as a means to promote racism. Tea Partiers don't realize that English is the major language spoken in the U.S.? And that immigrants coming into the U.S. learn English? What more do they want?
"15. Traditional family values are encouraged."
Over the years, this has been a major issue for the right. But what kind of family values, specifically? Does it mean having to become a Christian? Human values are just as important as family values.

This is concludes the three-part article, "The Political Anatomy of the Tea Party."

A Final Summation:

The Tea Party movement has been described as a loose association of national and local chapters without a central or national leadership. The term "grassroots" has been used, but given the kind of funding it gets and from whom, e.g., the Koch brothers, and its right-wing leanings, the term "astroturfing", i.e., phony or artificial roots, has been a more accurate phrase.

Tea Partiers think of themselves as full members of the Republican Party, trying to save it from losing its "true" form of conservatism.

Professor Christopher Parker of the University of Washington conducted research on Tea Party supporters and found that they "tended to be more racist, sexist, homophobic, and anti-Obama" more than anything else.

One example of homophobia came from a former mayor of Troy in Michigan, Janice Daniels, who said, "I think I'm going to throw away my I Love New York carrying bag now that queers can get married there," referring to New York's act to allow same-sex couples to legally get married.

Robert Parry wrote a detailed piece entitled "The Tea Party's Legacy of Racism," describing the consequences of racism within U.S. history, and pointing out that today, "Tea Partiers' hatred of what they call 'amnesty' [immigration reform] is best understood as a recognition that many of those new citizens would have brown skin and likely vote Democratic, thus further diluting white power in the United States."

Parry adds that the right-wing itself "has rewritten the nation's Founding narrative," without any noticeable rebuttal from the media. The Tea Partiers' version of U.S. history isn't something that should be relied on for accuracy, given the politics involved.

The Tea Party is somewhat of an antiquated regression back into an already-dead past, of which it dwells in.

David Starr writes on social and political issues, national and international.

©

EMAIL TO A FRIEND X
Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags

?

More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

  •  Those TP points are kind of squishy (0+ / 0-)

    They sound all dandy as slogans but I'm sure when it comes to implementing those points they get to interpret them any way their sponsors want.

    Growth for the sake of growth is the ideology of the cancer cell. --Edward Abbey

    by ricklewsive on Tue Jan 07, 2014 at 09:42:03 AM PST

  •  Umm... (2+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    ricklewsive, lightarty
    "12. Political offices must be available to average citizens."
    Another point anyone could agree on, but the appropriate skills/education should be a requirement.
    Who determines appropriate skills and or education?
    Gotta point out that requiring, say, a Bachelor's degree to hold public office disqualifies a lot of people for no good reason. Education is expensive. If there's anything we should have learned from the latest Romney campaign, it's that education does not equal suitability for office. What skills are important for what positions? How do we know?

    I actually like their statement a whole lot more than your comment about it.

    •  Skills (0+ / 0-)

      In regards to having an appropriate education to hold office, it's in reference to improvements through change, where there would be more office holders who would be suitable for the position.

      True, education is expensive, terribly, so. But that's another thing that needs change, going along with other goals.

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site