Skip to main content

For the first time in history, most members of Congress are millionaires, an analysis of financial disclosure data by the Center for Responsive Politics showed earlier today.

Of 534 current members of Congress, at least 268 had an average net worth of $1 million or more in 2012, according to disclosures filed last year by all members of Congress and candidates. The median net worth for the 530 current lawmakers who were in Congress as of the May filing deadline was $1,008,767 -- an increase from last year when it was $966,000. In addition, at least one of the members elected since then, Rep. Katherine Clark (D-Mass.), is a millionaire, according to forms she filed as a candidate. (There is currently one vacancy in Congress.)


Breaking the numbers down further, congressional Democrats had a median net worth of $1.04 million, while congressional Republicans had a median net worth of almost exactly $1 million. In both cases, the figures are up from last year, when the numbers were $990,000 and $907,000, respectively.

The median net worth for all House members was $896,000 -- that's up from $856,000 in 2011 -- with House Democrats (median net worth: $929,000) holding an edge over House Republicans (median net worth: $884,000). The median net worth for both House Republicans and Democrats was higher than in 2011.

Similarly, the median net worth for all senators increased to $2.7 million from $2.5 million, but in that body it was the Republicans who were better-off. Senate Democrats reported a median net worth of $1.7 million (a decline from 2011's $2.4 million), compared to Senate Republicans, at $2.9 million (an increase from $2.5 million).

In both 2010 and 2011, the median net worth in the country was approximately $68,828 according to the Census. The Federal Reserve had a higher estimate for 2010, around $77,300. I would infer that these numbers have not changed drastically since then (although they might have ticked up slightly). Even if I'm extra-generous in estimating post-2011 change, the median member of Congress would still have a net worth between 10 and 15 times greater than the average American.

Earlier today, I read that Congress is likely to settle on a Farm Bill that cuts $8.7 billion from food stamps, which translates to a $90 reduction in monthly benefits for SNAP recipients. And I read that the Senate is nearing a deal to extend long-term unemployment benefits by extending the sequestration cuts for a year, cutting the time frame of UI benefits, and reducing disability insurance benefits.

Such stories are clearly related. When most members of Congress are millionaires, the daily experience of the poor and the struggling will simply not seem as real to them. The poor are another country in their eyes. And, frankly, one could say the same about their relationship with much of the middle-class as well.

A 2011 study from professors at Northwestern University found that those in the 1% are more likely than other groups to see the federal budget deficit as the country's most pressing problem and to prefer free markets and philanthropy rather than government action to address social problems. When I first read that report, one chart in particular struck me, the one on opinions regarding the government's role in job creation.

Senators and Representatives likely socialize with members of their own social class, an echo chamber of elite opinion.

A hundred years ago, Victor Berger, the first Socialist elected to Congress, and Anne Martin, the first woman to run for Senate, criticized Congress as a "soviet of lawyers (and bankers)." Plus ça change...

Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags


More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site