Skip to main content

Really, could not believe my Congresswoman Corrine Brown would do this. I wrote to her last week, "I know you'll do the right thing." But she and 88 other Democrats voted to pass a Farm Bill in the House today that cuts food stamps by $8 billion over ten years.

And I do not care about the rationalizations. They should have stood up on principle and demanded cuts instead, if cuts need be made, to the military budget, the bloated, engorged, humongous multi-billion dollar worthless, unnecessary ships or planes or projectiles or WHAT-ever, things that go boom and KILL LOTS of PEOPLE. Or Whatever! Some of those corporate/plutocrat giveaways.

You see, that $8 billion of food stamp cuts? It's about ONE HALF of total cuts to a TRILLION dollar bill.

The House of Representatives on Wednesday passed a bill authorizing nearly $1 trillion in spending on farm subsidies and nutrition programs, setting the stage for final passage of a new five-year farm bill that has been stalled for over two years.

Negotiators from the House and Senate spent several weeks working out their differences on issues in the legislation, including cuts to food stamps, income caps on farm subsidies and a price support program for dairy farmers. The bill is expected to save about $16.6 billion over the next 10 years.

Democrats. I've been one all my life. I'm seventy. It's a long time. I have been a proud liberal who stood for principles, like helping the poor, all my life. I thought that my party stood together for that, among others, like human justice, equality of all kinds, voting rights, civil rights, privacy rights, basic human dignity and rights. Today? Opposite of proud.

But all too often, without an extraordinary leader in Congress like Ted Kennedy or countless others, we see this weakness in Democrats.

Why not stand up to Republicans in negotiations! Say:

"We need to cut where it won't hurt vulnerable people. We need to cut the bloated military where it won't be missed so much, this $8 billion. One less ship or plane we don't need anyhow, or that we know already does not work!"
Why not say to Republicans:
"America has more than 40 million PEOPLE, men women and CHILDREN, living in poverty. This is due to the economy and the fact that we don't have enough jobs for full employment! Due also to inequalities, due to historical factors never addressed, inequities, problems in our capitalist system. And due to LOW WAGES, low minimum wage, because many or most of those living in poverty DO WORK, THEY HAVE JOBS, THEY SIMPLY do NOT Earn Enough!"
Why don't our Democratic Representatives say:  
"So, Republicans, as we negotiate, realize, please, that poor children who do not have enough food are going to grow up weaker, less able. That it is not good for the richest country in the world to operate this way. To let our children subsist on cheap carbs, to go to bed hungry, to go without adequate nourishment for growing bodies."
Why not say to Republicans:
"Let's cut subsidies to oil companies and other corporations. Why not reign in those off shore bank accounts that the wealthy use to avoid our taxes? Why can they get away without paying a dime when our middle class people pay plenty?"
I wrote a day ago that I was ashamed of the Democrats who negotiated this deal, who helped write a Farm Bill that cut food stamps. I wrote from my place of poverty, of age, of inability to work, of subsisting on less than $800/month, of getting used to being poor these last ten years for the first time in my life, and what it's like to already have had my food stamps here in Florida cut by almost 40% (with no changes in my circumstances).

This time I am writing out of my outrage and fury and sadness at MY PARTY doing this, to me, but more to MILLIONS OF POOR PEOPLE who have no where else to turn when they are hungry. Not everyone has access to a "food pantry." For instance, I know of none where I live.

Children will grow up weak and unmotivated, and malnourished here in the wealthiest country in all creation, EVER.

And we know:

The wealthiest 85 PEOPLE in the world have more than the poorest half of humanity which is 3.5 BILLION PEOPLE.
Yep, think of that a minute. And we're just asking for some food to help us get by.

So. It kind of leaves you shaking your head, right?

Nancy Pelosi, Debbie Wasserman-Shultz, Corrine Brown (my Rep), Jim Clyburn (!?) and  85 others.
Can you feel my disdain? I don't want to hear you splain to me that this will only hurt those at the "top" of the poverty "group" -- not those like me toward the "bottom." Nope, don't want to hear it! Poverty is poverty, and those with two kids living on minimum wage jobs, they may be near the "top" but they are hurting! They need this help. So shame on you today. I'm sick of my party doing this kind of thing.
I'm beginning, for the first time, to wonder if we might need a third party.

Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags


More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

  •  Just wrote to Corrine Brown, this: (12+ / 0-)
    It is appalling and discouraging to me that you voted for a Farm Bill today that decreases the SNAP program by $8 billion over ten years. Yes, I have been a Democrat all my life and I am 70. I live in poverty on SS of $793 a month. I now get $91 on food stamps, down from $145 early last year.

    The point is this. Helping the poor stay alive, have some basic nutrition, that is what the Democratic Party has always stood for. Not against. This vote by you and Pelosi and other Democrats has DEEPLY OFFENDED AND OUTRAGED ME and many many others. SHAME ON YOU!!

    Yes, Shame on you and all other Democrats for not standing up to Republicans and demand reductions in military spending! Instead of programs to help the poor. You should have cut farm subsidies to the corporate WEALTHY instead of taking what little the poor have.

    I shudder to think of the impact on poor families trying to feed young children, or hungry, growing teen boys, for instance.

    You know what? I do not care what arguments you have, what RATIONALIZATIONS you have made to yourself to vote for cutting food stamps. But I'd like you to write and tell me how you can look at yourself in the mirror, or at a poor hungry child, after taking this vote today. Wow. I remember writing to you in a petition that "I know you will do the right thing." I thought all I had to worry about was Marco Rubio, not your or Bill Nelson. You have deeply offended me.

    "extreme concentration of income is incompatible with real democracy.... the truth is that the whole nature of our society is at stake." Paul Krugman

    by Gorette on Wed Jan 29, 2014 at 01:14:37 PM PST

  •  Almost all of the cuts apply only to blue states, (1+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:

    where the most taxes are paid to the Federal government.

    "Southern nights have you ever felt a southern night?" Allen Toussaint ~~Remember the Gulf of Mexico~~

    by rubyr on Wed Jan 29, 2014 at 04:13:18 PM PST

  •  I agree, but what's with the first names? (0+ / 0-)

    Fight them to the end, until the children of the poor eat better than the dogs of the rich.

    by raincrow on Wed Jan 29, 2014 at 05:48:25 PM PST

    •  It's how I think of them, I guess. Didn't even (0+ / 0-)

      give it a thought. Sorry if it bothers you. The names of Debbie W-S and Nancy P are names I see every day it seems. And Corrine is my cong critter.

      "extreme concentration of income is incompatible with real democracy.... the truth is that the whole nature of our society is at stake." Paul Krugman

      by Gorette on Wed Jan 29, 2014 at 07:10:05 PM PST

      [ Parent ]

      •  I've mostly seen it used to indicate disrespect (0+ / 0-)

        i.e., using mens' titles and/or surnames but referring to women by their first names, and I was surprised a woman would do so here. Glad I was mistaken!

        Fight them to the end, until the children of the poor eat better than the dogs of the rich.

        by raincrow on Thu Jan 30, 2014 at 08:55:08 AM PST

        [ Parent ]

        •  Also because the names fit in title, but using (0+ / 0-)

          Wasserman-Shultz would not!! ;<}

          "extreme concentration of income is incompatible with real democracy.... the truth is that the whole nature of our society is at stake." Paul Krugman

          by Gorette on Tue Feb 04, 2014 at 09:41:36 AM PST

          [ Parent ]

  •  There is no excuse (2+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    seeking justice, Gorette

    The republicans wanted these cuts for no other reason than to inflict more pain on the people who have been victimized by previous republican schemes which led to the biggest financial disaster in decades, that's how they are.
    The Democrats who voted with the republicans can make all the excuses they want to but they are just as guilty as the republicans.  This bill would not have passed without Democratic support, there was plenty of leverage there but many of our party's leaders chose to abandon everything that being a Democrat means.  

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site