Skip to main content

Well, that's disappointing.

Wendy Davis, whose filibuster against new abortion restrictions in Texas made her a liberal hero and led her to run for governor this year, says in a new interview that she could, in fact, support a law that bans abortion after 20 weeks.
Portions of her interview were published in the Dallas Morning News:
Davis said she could have supported a bill that contained only a 20-week ban, but the law's restrictions on clinics and doctors have greatly curtailed access to the procedure in parts of Texas.

"It was the least objectionable," she said. "I would have and could have voted to allow that to go through, if I felt like we had tightly defined the ability for a woman and a doctor to be making this decision together and not have the Legislature get too deep in the weeds of how we would describe when that was appropriate."

It appears that she's attempting to thread the needle, to retain the mantle of "liberal hero" but also to expand her appeal to more conservative voters.  I don't think the strategy is a good one.

UPDATE:  Apparently a few Kossacks seem to think that I am distorting Davis' position, that her clarification about her stance is really not news at all.

She stated clearly to the Dallas Morning News (and I keep referring back to that paper because it was the original source of her comments) that her reason for filibustering the bill was primarily because it restricted the ability of clinics to operate--that such restrictions would place an unfair burden on those women who indeed were seeking such procedures.  She did not filibuster because of the arbitrary cut-off; she did not filibuster because provisions for fetal abnormalities or life of the mother were lacking, for they were included.

If we were to split hairs, it would be on the language of "risk to the woman's life" as to "risk to the woman's health"--those distinctions were not included in the DMN article, to the detriment of the readership and to our elucidation.

However, why would Davis come out to clarify that she'd support a 20-week ban in the first place, when even she details precisely that fetuses at 20 weeks are generally not viable?  Why would she say she was in support of that cut-off at all, even with caveats?

Who is she trying to woo with this softened stance?

Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags


More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site