Skip to main content

The latest Tennessee Chamber "Capitol Update" newsletter came out today with a message for State Representatives on the Tennessee House Committee for Consumer and Human resources.  We are watching, and we are scoring.  

This is one way the US Chamber of Commerce and its affiliates, such as the Tennessee Chamber of Commerce, exert influence.  They create a scorecard.  Who they support, and who they do not support will be influenced by this scorecard.  And by influence, that means donations from the US Chamber of Commerce and its various affiliates.

This time the issue they are scoring is lawsuit lending legislation.  In particular, a bill that the US Chamber and Tennessee Chamber have sponsored to protect their constituents, big insurance companies such as State Farm and Allstate, and businesses by banning consumer legal funding in Tennessee through the imposition of rate caps that would make the industry price its money below cost.

Yes, the champions of business interests are advocating restrictive pricing and profit control.  For the benefit of insurance companies, businesses or the consumer?

Here is the excerpt from the Tennessee Chamber of Commerce Capitol Update for February 13, 2013 that discusses the legal funding legislation:

Lawsuit Lending Stalls in House Committee: Hearing Scheduled for Next Week

This week, disruption occurred during House committee debate of lawsuit lending legislation as members questioned House Chair Jimmy Eldridge over a procedural motion. Once a final committee vote is taken on all amendment and legislation, the Chamber will note the vote totals and point out supporters and opponents. The Chamber-supported legislation seeks to provide regulation for lawsuit lenders.  The legislation, supported by the Tennessee Chamber and many other business associations across the state, proposes to provide much needed regulation and an interest-rate cap. The legislation is important and will be counted in our annual scorecard that is distributed statewide after the end of the legislative session.  Business has noted that lawsuit lenders, many of which are located out of state, drive up business litigation costs for insurance, medical malpractice, and a number of other business areas. We urge you to contact members of the committee to support regulation on lawsuit lenders with caps that provide protection for Tennessee consumers!

(Emphasis added)

The Tennessee Chamber Capitol Update then lists the name, district, email and phone number of each representative on the committee so the Tennessee members of the Chamber can call on the committee members to express their views.  Keep in mind that this paragraph above is likely the only information that the constituents of the Tennessee Chamber have seen on the topic of consumer legal funding.

Note that at a January 28th hearing, the Chamber stated that "we don't want to drive this industry out of business".  Yet then they strongly advocate for a bill that provides price controls that provide negative margins for industry participants, and has other poison pill provisions such as non-assignability of transactions (so a legal funding providers cannot get bank lines), and a physical presence requirement.

Could it be that the insurance companies behind the US Chamber, such as State Farm and Allstate, do not like financial assistance going to the consumers that allows consumers to withstand financial pressures and lowball insurance company settlement offers?

Originally posted to FreeMarkets on Thu Feb 13, 2014 at 06:47 PM PST.

Also republished by Three Star Kossacks.

Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags


More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

  •  My dad worked in the upper management (5+ / 0-)

    of several big insurance companies for most of his career. Mostly, he was on the oil and gas lines end of things. He will tell you that price-fixing in the insurance business--while illegal, and in fact one of his bosses went to Federal prison for this, it's a RICO violation--is rampant. It's still going on, even by companies that have been seriously dinged for it in the past. Like insider trading, this kind of behavior is difficult to prove.

    They will also do anything within their power (not necessarily within the law) to avoid paying claims.

    While insurance is a necessary evil, and perhaps because it is a necessary evil, it's also legalized theft.

    Frankly, I think we need some serious reform here.

    Pope Francis: the Thumb of Christ in the eyes of the Pharisees.

    by commonmass on Thu Feb 13, 2014 at 06:55:00 PM PST

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site