Skip to main content

Well, this is something you don't see everyday.

Remember that NJ Transit Vote the Port Authority took from a while back -- Well Chairman Samson really "didn't intend to Vote" that day -- SO the Port Authority lawyer says it's OK, if they just strike that conflicted Samson vote from the official record ...

Just.Like.It.Never.Happened.   How financially convenient of them.

Port Authority lawyer to alter vote by board chairman on NJ Transit lease

by Shawn Boburg and Abbott Koloff, The Record, -- Feb 19, 2014

The Port Authority’s general counsel on Wednesday agreed to change the recorded board vote on a $1-a-year lease deal involving 13 acres of agency property after the board’s chairman said he did not intend to vote on the contract, which benefited NJ Transit, a client of his law firm.

The counsel, Darrell Buchbinder, was present at the February 2012 meeting and, according to the minutes, approved the vote as valid. After reviewing unspecified records kept by Port Authority Chairman David Samson, Buchbinder decided on Wednesday that Samson had “intended to recuse” himself on the issue rather than cast the recorded “yes” vote.

NJ Transit paid Samson’s firm up to $1.5 million for legal advice on an initiative to maximize profits on its parking lots, including one off Route 495 in North Bergen. The Port Authority, led by Samson, voted to give NJ Transit a 49-year lease on the park-and-ride lot for $1 per year. Previously, NJ Transit had paid more than $900,000. Samson voted for the deal, according to the now-disputed Port Authority official minutes.

For more on this "conflict of interest" Vote cast by Samson, on behalf of his paying clients, please see my post of a few days ago:

The Two Hats of David Samson
by jamess -- Feb 19, 2014

AND ... just in case this "Retro-active Recusal" trick 'doesn't take' in the NJ public psyche,

The Port Authority is floating a "new excuse" today to explain David Samson's non-recused vote, which retro-actively favored Samson's vested interests THEN:

David Samson had to Vote in order to "constitute a quorum" ...

PA offers new version of Samson vote recusal -- Feb 21, 2014

NEWARK, N.J. (AP) [...]

The Record newspaper reported ( Friday that the Port Authority now says the vote was actually taken by an operations committee because not enough board members were present.

Meeting minutes from the Feb. 9, 2012 board meeting were formally adopted at the Port Authority's meeting the next month. They show that six board members, including Samson, voted to approve the NJ Transit deal.

Minutes of the operations committee from the same date reflect that Samson called a special meeting of the committee because there wouldn't be enough board members to constitute a quorum. The minutes show the committee considering three matters -- involving Newark Liberty Airport runway work, World Trade Center parking and an environmental lawsuit -- but not the NJ Transit lease. A Port Authority spokesman didn't return a message seeking clarification.

Ahhh,  Strike Two!

What pathetic excuse will they float next --  That the Wolff & Samson legal beagle ate the $1.5 Million dollar contract, that the firm has with their client NJ Transit -- but just on the day of the Vote, only?

Yeah that's the ticket!   The office dog temporarily ate the contract.  So David Samson's in the clear, Right?

He.Really.Didn't.Do.Anything.Wrong. Right? Conflict of Interest, is whatever THEY say it is ...

Or in other words, whatever is retro actively politically expedient for them NOW.

Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags


More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site