Skip to main content

Senate Intelligence Committee member Mark Udall’s public release of this letter, addressed to President Obama, invites the question of

why didn’t Udall hold the letter back long enough to obtain co-signatures from Committee members like the following?

•    CIA & NSA sympathizers Dianne Feinstein (chair) and Susan Collins (“moderate” Republican), and/or

•    CIA & NSA critics Ron Wyden & Martin Heinrich (who have previously coordinated statements with Udall)

Feinstein has publicly confirmed CIA resistance to oversight, by predicting “Our oversight role will prevail,” which raises the related question:
What is “oversight”?
Answers and more questions below the jump.

What is “oversight”? While perfect oversight may be difficult to define,
absence of oversight is easy to spot by hints like

the subject of oversight being free (even many years after embarrassing conduct reportedly ended) to:

•    Equate its own embarrassment with the nation’s security

•    Destroy and withhold evidence of its embarrassments

•    Negotiate and restrict overseers’ access to its embarrassments

•    Hack and monitor findings of overseers, to enable the subject to selectively admit only things that have been proven, while denying everything else

•    After a majority of overseers have finally agreed on the text of an oversight report, then delay and seek to prevent public release of the report, while publicly lying about its contents

With these hints in mind, please re-read Udall’s letter and ask yourself the following questions:
•    Did Udall fear that, if he spent weeks seeking signatures from Feinstein or Collins, or even a day or two seeking signatures from Wyden or Heinrich, then his public release of the letter might be prevented?

•    Is Udall the only official needing to be rescued? Is Udall trying to alert the public that President Obama is partly in the same boat?

•    Is the last chance to start such a rescue in the balance right now, in 2014 Senate races that could do the following?
        re-elect Udall, and thereby empower Udall, Wyden and Heinrich,
        defeat Collins, and replace her with civil libertarian challenger Shenna Bellows, and
        educate – on the direction of public opinion – Obama, Feinstein and other surveillance “moderates”, including candidate and President Hillary Clinton

As for readers skeptical of changing too much too fast, please ask yourself in what direction we can expect things to move in coming years if Obama, Feinstein and Hillary Clinton observe that the 2014 elections have:
•    cost Udall his purple-state seat in the Senate (thus reducing the Committee’s skeptical bloc by 1/3), and

•    not cost Collins her blue-state seat (thus demonstrating that voters don't care much about failing Senatorial oversight,

...even in this year of ever-more shocking disclosures?

What happens if Hillary follows Obama into being implicated in, and further cements as a bipartisan consensus, the no-accountability torture and no-oversight surveillance trends inherited from W & Cheney?

Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags


More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site