Skip to main content

Last night, on Piers Morgan, Abby Martin went off on corporate media propaganda.

Martin was bothered by seeing “the corporate media coverage almost wanting to revive the Cold War” and continuing to “warmonger and fearmonger the American people.” She asked Morgan, “Why do I have to work for RT to tell the truth about corporations and the US government? I mean, seriously, you guys are beholden to advertisers that you cannot criticize.”
She said that everybody had to step back and find a peaceful solution instead of buying into the corporate media propaganda. She drew an equivalence between RT's pro-Russian war propaganda and the American corporate media's and said that she had the support of her bosses despite her views.

The whole question revolves around editorial independence. It really depends on each organization, whether there is sufficient separation between the corporate interests and the journalistic interests of the venture. For a corporation that is beholden to its advertisers, like CNN, there is always a potential for conflicts of interest in its reporting. The job of the reader is to be aware of potential biases in reporting.

Everything depends on each individual story. The same organization may publish stories that are worthwhile journalism and then turn around and publish something that is propagandistic trash.

A lot depends on the smell test. Let's use an RT story from yesterday as an example. Yesterday, RT put up a headline alleging that it was the Euromaidan leaders who hired snipers to shoot on their own protestors so that they could blame it on their own government. There were immediate problems with this. First, it was from a second-hand source (the Estonian foreign minister) who said that he got it from one of the doctors there. That would have been a pretty big story had it been true. But I didn't diary about it because it was a second-hand source and the doctor in question would not have been in a position to know for a fact. It was simply conjecture on her part, even if she had been quoted accurately. It didn't pass the smell test for me. And another media outlet tracked her down and it turns out that she didn't say what the Estonian FM said she did.

Let's use another example -- Judith Miller. She dutifully reported the hysterical claims of the Bush administration regarding WMD's in Iraq without bothering to fact checking the allegations. It's OK to have political beliefs as a reporter, but for Miller, her right wing political beliefs and her access to Scooter Libby and other members of the Bush Administration were more important for her than her duty to report the facts as she saw them. Not enough people bothered to fact check her until it was too late. And over a million people died in Iraq as a result.

EMAIL TO A FRIEND X
Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags

?

More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site