Skip to main content


Relax.  The cosmos itself is just fine (or as fine as it can be).  

It's the new version of Carl Sagans epic series, Cosmos, that's being attacked.  The anti-science crowd and religious fundamentalists have their undies in a bunch and they're not gonna take it anymore.  

Read on below the cheese doodle for more on the nutbags.  

But First, A Word From Our Sponsor:

Top Comments recognizes the previous day's Top Mojo and strives to promote each day's outstanding comments through nominations made by Kossacks like you. Please send comments (before 9:30pm ET) by email to or by our KosMail message board. Just click on the Spinning Top™ to make a submission. Look for the Spinning Top™ to pop up in diaries posts around Daily Kos.

Make sure that you include the direct link to the comment (the URL), which is available by clicking on that comment's date/time. Please let us know your Daily Kos user name if you use email so we can credit you properly. If you send a writeup with the link, we can include that as well. The diarist poster reserves the right to edit all content.

Please come in. You're invited to make yourself at home! Join us beneath the doodle...

Here's the trailer.

The series itself is incredible.

However, the anti-science crowd doesn't approve.  They disapprove of the Big Bang Theory (it's only a theory, you know), think evolution is a lie (after all, it's in the Bible about Adam and Eve so you don't need no stinkin' science to tell you anything different), and that climate change isn't real.   They needed fainting couches after all 3 were not only covered in the very first episode of the new series, but presented as actual facts.

Over at the pro-"intelligent design" Discovery Institute, they're not happy. Senior fellow David Klinghoffer writes that the latest Cosmos episode "[extrapolated] shamelessly, promiscuously from artificial selection (dogs from wolves) to minor stuff like the color of a polar bear's fur to the development of the human eye." In a much more elaborate attempted takedown, meanwhile, the institute's Casey Luskin accuses Tyson and Cosmos of engaging in "attempts to persuade people of both evolutionary scientific views and larger materialistic evolutionary beliefs, not just by the force of the evidence, but by rhetoric and emotion, and especially by leaving out important contrary arguments and evidence." Luskin goes on to contend that there is something wrong with the idea of the "tree of life." Tell that to the scientists involved in the Open Tree of Life project, which plans to produce "the first online, comprehensive first-draft tree of all 1.8 million named species, accessible to both the public and scientific communities." Precisely how to reconstruct every last evolutionary relationship may still be an open scientific question, but the idea of common ancestry, the core of evolution (represented conceptually by a tree of life), is not.
For those of you not in the know, those who formerly believed in creationism (i.e. the Biblical creation story), now prefer to present those same views as "science" under the name "intelligent design".  The rhetoric and reasoning are the same;  only the name has changed (sounds more sciency).

Now they're demanding EQUAL air time for their moronic point of view.

Neil Degrasse Tyson has pushed back.  Hard:

Tyson recently addressed providing balance when it comes to discussing science. In an interview with CNN, the astronomer criticized the media for giving "equal time" to those who oppose widely accepted scientific theories.

"I think the media has to sort of come out of this ethos that I think was in principle a good one, but doesn't really apply in science. The ethos was, whatever story you give, you have to give the opposing view, and then you can be viewed as balanced," Tyson said, adding, "you don't talk about the spherical earth with NASA and then say let's give equal time to the flat-earthers."

Target. Arrow. Bullseye.

You don't discuss gravity and then give equal time to the anti-Newtonians.  Nobody remotely serious should be even mentioning, much less giving equal time to science deniers.  And it's the job of the media to inform the public and not to provide either infortainment or misinformation.  It's the reason journalism was give strong protection in our Constitution.  

Cenk Uyger and the Young Turks had fun with the RW outrage.  

They had way too much fun with this as evident from the background laughter as statements of those angry with Cosmos were read.  

Yes, the RW reaction is expected, angry, outrageous, loud, and completely ignorant.  Intellectually, these folks might as well live in the Dark Ages where there's still confusion about where the sun goes at night.  And the recent spate of vaccine deniers makes me wonder whether they'll soon return to the days when bad odors or the wrath of God were thought to be the cause of disease.

Today, we have science to explain many of the past mysteries (we KNOW where the sun goes at night and not only the causes, but the treatment and prevention of many diseases).  We have telescopes, microscopes, a large fossil record, knowledge of chemistry, physics, medicine, and even space crafts and submarines that go where we can't.  We've mapped the human genome and discovered that we share a vast amount of our DNA with other creatures.  

None of that matters to a loud and boisterous group that celebrates it's stupidity.  

Sadly, corporate media placating the cretins has only made them more outrageous. Giving ANY time to the baloney they're selling only gives it credence in the minds of viewers.  It's time to end the "opposing views" he said/she said journalism that keeps making us dumber.

But, until the media wakes up from it's coma and does it's job, it's up to us to do the one thing that extremists really hate; make them and their drivel into a laughingstock.  In an interview on, IIRC 60 Minutes (the old, better show), Mel Brooks says that laughing at fanatics is the best thing we can do.  They are diminished by laughter.

One anti-Semite Brooks has been trying to get even with for most of his adult life is Adolf Hitler, whom he lampoons first in his movie and now on the stage. "Hitler was part of this incredible idea that you could put Jews in concentration camps and kill them…How do you get even with the man? How do you get even with him?" he asks Wallace.

"You have to bring him down with ridicule, because if you stand on a soapbox and you match him with rhetoric, you're just as bad as he is, but if you can make people laugh at him, then you're one up on him," he tells Wallace. "It's been one of my lifelong jobs - to make the world laugh at Adolf Hitler," says Brooks.

Join me in laughing at the morons. Let's diminish them.

March 25, 2014

Thanks to tonight's Top Comments contributors! Let us hear from YOU
when you find that proficient comment.

From LinSea:

Submits maggiejean's response to dharmasyds comment for it's quirky truthiness from Overnight News Digest: Flight MH370.
From Denise Oliver Velez:
This comment by DrWhk in Black Koses fabulous birthday tribute to Aretha Franklin  in Black Kos, Tuesday's Chile.  Happy Birthday, Aretha.
Flagged by WattleBreakfast:
This zinger by skillet in Abbreviated pundit roundup: Corporations can't have "religious beliefs".
Flagged by dawyflyer13:
This comment by Ice Blue in Ministry of Truths You go right ahead, GOP, and scorn every woman in America. Good luck with that.
From your humble diarist:
This comment by LamontCranston about the unnecessary militarization of our police and the plethora of unnecessary deaths that result.  From Lefty Coasters His last words were: “Please don’t hurt me anymore I can’t move” Police kill homeless man.

March 25, 2014

(excluding Tip Jars and first comments)

Got mik!

  1) same thing happened to me about a month by rexymeteorite — 183
  2) I know it sounds hokey, by Crashing Vor — 129
  3) It is quite apparent we need a by Horace Boothroyd III — 124
  4) Not at all, a huge potential burden has been by buddabelly — 98
  5) Signed up today by CJ WIHorse — 93
  6) His successors generally lowered the bar by RFK Lives — 88
  7) I don't know yet. Still too new. by Crashing Vor — 88
  8) not hokey at all by rexymeteorite — 87
  9) bless your Old Redneck heart for the help you've by peagreen — 83
10) I have hypertension... by Lorinda Pike — 82
11) Or a clarification of what the first amendment by LaFeminista — 78
12) I saw a billboard today -- by Mnemosyne — 78
13) One of the Form Letters Constantly Popping Up by Gooserock — 73
14) I agree by alaprst — 72
15) Put an educator as Secretary of Education-- by zenbassoon — 71
16) Calls to mind by Calvino Partigiani — 70
17) oh noes by Debbie in ME — 69
18) I've been lucky to have always had by Empty Vessel — 63
19) What a difference a bit of SECURITY makes ... by niemann — 62
20) {{{Marti}}} by triciawyse — 59
21) ai use andee voodoo doll an makez him bedder by Debbie in ME — 59
22) Just so you all know...I'm just stepping back and by The Marti — 59
23) For Horsefeathers and Andy and Dad.... by koosah — 58
24) Religion is like your personality by varii — 58
25) And crossed paws... by jennyp — 57
26) My, My, My...What An Interesting Insurance Company by snapples — 57
27) Shows what I know about luxuries by global citizen — 56
28) Obamacare Is Already Winning...... by snapples — 56
29) ((((Horsefeathers and Andy!))))♥ ♥ ♥ by Ekaterin — 55
30) I vote we put a ban on ominous x-rays. by FloridaSNMOM — 53
31) (((Horsefeathers))) by arizonablue — 53
32) Very fine "springy" stuff! by Old Sailor — 53
33) guess what? by ridemybike — 53
How incredible is this?  For an explanation of How Top Mojo Works, see mik's FAQing Top Mojo

Top Pictures for yesterday.  Click any image to be taken to the full comment. Thank you jotter for the awesome image magic!  

Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags


More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site